What do you think?
Rate this book
And No Birds Sing: Rhetorical Analyses of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring
Craig Waddell presents essays investigating Rachel Carson’s influential 1962 book, Silent Spring. In his foreword, Paul Brooks, Carson’s editor at Houghton Mifflin, describes the process that resulted in Silent Spring. In an afterword, Linda Lear, Carson’s recent biographer, recalls the end of Carson’s life and outlines the attention that Carson’s book and Carson herself received from scholars and biographers, attention that focused so minutely on her life that it detracted from a focus on her work. The foreword by Brooks and the afterword by Lear frame this exploration within the context of Carson’s life and work. Contributors are Edward P. J. Corbett, Carol B, Gartner, Cheryll Glotfelty, Randy Harris, M. Jimmie Killingsworth, Linda Lear, Ralph H. Lutts, Christine Oravec, Jacqueline S. Palmer, Markus J. Peterson, Tarla Rai Peterson, and Craig Waddell. Together, these essays explore Silent Spring ’s effectiveness in conveying its disturbing message and the rhetorical strategies that helped create its wide influence.
- GenresNonfictionEnvironment
256 pages, Paperback
First published April 2, 2000
3 people are currently reading
23 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
October 21, 2010
And No Birds Sing provides a collection of 9 essays of rhetorical analysis of Carson's Silent Spring, as well as an introduction by Paul Brooks (friend and publisher) and an afterword by Linda Lear (biographer). The articles are short, clear, and well-written. Such a book would be particularly useful the next time I teach Silent Spring because I find students sometimes have trouble seeing the literary merits of the work and they also sometimes struggle to know how to analyze non-fiction narratives.
In the first article, The Reception of Silent Spring, Craig Waddell reviews the reviews of Silent Spring. He contrasts the apocalyptic hypothesis, "the success of Silent Spring is attributable to the appeal of Carson's apocalyptic vision, which is especially prominent in A Fable For Tomorrow, the book's opening chapter" with the "zeitgeist thesis: that is, that it was not Carson's apocalyptic appeal per se that facilitated public reception of her work but rather her ability to ally her concerns with the spirit of the times 0- which happened to be dominated by an apocalyptic fear of nuclear holocaust." Neither hypothesis is true, according to his research. There is no "silver bullet" to explain the success of Carson's work. Rather, a range of factors contribute to her success.
The second article, Chemical Fallout, by Ralph H. Lutts would be particularly appropriate for my classes. This article explains the knowledge of nuclear fallout to which Carson's readers likely had access and then explains the ways she uses fallout as a metaphor to explain pesticides in Silent Spring. As Lutts points out, "It is no accident, then, that the first pollutant that Carson mentioned by name in Silent Spring was not a pesticide but strontium 90" (34).
The third article by Christine Oravec uses inventional archeology to outline the narrative choices that Carson made using the drafts available at the Beinecke Library. Oravec is particularly interested in Carson's mingling of the factual and the fictional.
The fourth article by Edward Corbett analyzes the second chapter, "The Obligation to Endure" as an example of deliberate discourse.
In Chapter 5, Tarla Rai Peterson and Markus J. Peterson argue that "much of Silent Spring's vocabulary has been incorporated into mainstream environmental-science education" (73). They emphasize the appeals to logic that Carson made alongside her appeals to emotion, which lent scientific credibility to attacks on the chemical industry. They argue she creates an alternative understanding of progress by separating science from technology.
Carol Gartner's essay was particularly beautifully written. "Rachel Carson's major achievement in Silent Spring is a fusion of science and literary art so seamless that the effect is seductive. To her contemporary critics in industry and science, it was so effective it was insidious" (103).
"Finally, Carson demonstrates her mastery of the rhetorical principle of audience analysis - a skill crucial to any literary artist- through pragmatic appeals to human self-interest interwove n with calls for a more altruistic concern for preservation of the natural world. Only gradually does she push her readers toward the more difficult concept that preserving the greater environment is implicit in preserving ourselves. Unlike some more extreme later ecologists, who found in her work part of the inspiration for their movement, Carson believe a knowledgeable and aroused public could bring about immediate changes in government policy and industry practice, beginning what she realized would be a long, incremental process. She shaped her strategies in Silent Spring to reach the general public and mobilize what she knew could be formidable forces to counter industry and to insist upon change." As is suggested by this quotation, the article ends by contrasting Carson and Leopold's "ecological perspectives" with the deep ecology of Sessions and Naess.
In, "Other-Words in Silent Spring," Randy Harris investigates Carson's use of quotations. He contends she quotes three groups: good guys (scientists who understand the harms of insecticides and offer alternatives), bad guys (industry reps), and citizens (non-specialists who show the bewilderment and outrage of the general public. Harris also looks at her use of anecdotes, including where the stories come from and how she rewords them. He also draws our attention to Carson's frequent use of scare quotes.
Cheryll Glotfelty argues in essay eight that Carson "redirected the language and concepts of the Cold War to apply to 'man's war against nature' (Carson 7)" (159). She contends that Carson's rhetoric mobilized a war against industry as the despoilers of nature. Carson could have, Glotfelty contends, convinced her readership that insects were no the enemy and war was not the answer. As Gotfelty points out, Carson also does not suggest we need to live in peace with insects, but that we need smarter battle plans and better generals. These are the alternative methods of control Carson proposes in the final chapter.
My favorite quotation from Glotfelty's chapter: Silent Spring likewise creates a bipolar, melodramatic picture, with the pesticide industry and its henchmen in the Department of Agriculture on one side; Carson and a few heroic biologists and concerned citizens on the other; and with fainting nature and the unsuspecting American public costarring as damsels in distress" (163).
In the final chapter, M. Jimmie Killingsworth and Jacqueline S. Palmer examine the parallels between Carson's work and the genre of science fiction. "Our aim is to take science fiction seriously, not as a substitute for science, but as a response to science tha tcontributes to the development of myths. And we treat myths not as the cultural equivalent of lies, mistakes, or superstitutions that scientific enlightenment is committed to destroy but as collective narratives reaching beyond the boundaries of any specialized body of knoweldge and touching the heart of a society's emotional, spiritual, and intellectual consciousness" (175-176).
Lear counters the image of Carson as a loner by highlighting the importance of her many female friendships and the reasons she cultivated a separation between her public and private life while promoting Silent Spring . She speaks specifically of Carson's loving relationship with Dorothy Freeman.
In the first article, The Reception of Silent Spring, Craig Waddell reviews the reviews of Silent Spring. He contrasts the apocalyptic hypothesis, "the success of Silent Spring is attributable to the appeal of Carson's apocalyptic vision, which is especially prominent in A Fable For Tomorrow, the book's opening chapter" with the "zeitgeist thesis: that is, that it was not Carson's apocalyptic appeal per se that facilitated public reception of her work but rather her ability to ally her concerns with the spirit of the times 0- which happened to be dominated by an apocalyptic fear of nuclear holocaust." Neither hypothesis is true, according to his research. There is no "silver bullet" to explain the success of Carson's work. Rather, a range of factors contribute to her success.
The second article, Chemical Fallout, by Ralph H. Lutts would be particularly appropriate for my classes. This article explains the knowledge of nuclear fallout to which Carson's readers likely had access and then explains the ways she uses fallout as a metaphor to explain pesticides in Silent Spring. As Lutts points out, "It is no accident, then, that the first pollutant that Carson mentioned by name in Silent Spring was not a pesticide but strontium 90" (34).
The third article by Christine Oravec uses inventional archeology to outline the narrative choices that Carson made using the drafts available at the Beinecke Library. Oravec is particularly interested in Carson's mingling of the factual and the fictional.
The fourth article by Edward Corbett analyzes the second chapter, "The Obligation to Endure" as an example of deliberate discourse.
In Chapter 5, Tarla Rai Peterson and Markus J. Peterson argue that "much of Silent Spring's vocabulary has been incorporated into mainstream environmental-science education" (73). They emphasize the appeals to logic that Carson made alongside her appeals to emotion, which lent scientific credibility to attacks on the chemical industry. They argue she creates an alternative understanding of progress by separating science from technology.
Carol Gartner's essay was particularly beautifully written. "Rachel Carson's major achievement in Silent Spring is a fusion of science and literary art so seamless that the effect is seductive. To her contemporary critics in industry and science, it was so effective it was insidious" (103).
"Finally, Carson demonstrates her mastery of the rhetorical principle of audience analysis - a skill crucial to any literary artist- through pragmatic appeals to human self-interest interwove n with calls for a more altruistic concern for preservation of the natural world. Only gradually does she push her readers toward the more difficult concept that preserving the greater environment is implicit in preserving ourselves. Unlike some more extreme later ecologists, who found in her work part of the inspiration for their movement, Carson believe a knowledgeable and aroused public could bring about immediate changes in government policy and industry practice, beginning what she realized would be a long, incremental process. She shaped her strategies in Silent Spring to reach the general public and mobilize what she knew could be formidable forces to counter industry and to insist upon change." As is suggested by this quotation, the article ends by contrasting Carson and Leopold's "ecological perspectives" with the deep ecology of Sessions and Naess.
In, "Other-Words in Silent Spring," Randy Harris investigates Carson's use of quotations. He contends she quotes three groups: good guys (scientists who understand the harms of insecticides and offer alternatives), bad guys (industry reps), and citizens (non-specialists who show the bewilderment and outrage of the general public. Harris also looks at her use of anecdotes, including where the stories come from and how she rewords them. He also draws our attention to Carson's frequent use of scare quotes.
Cheryll Glotfelty argues in essay eight that Carson "redirected the language and concepts of the Cold War to apply to 'man's war against nature' (Carson 7)" (159). She contends that Carson's rhetoric mobilized a war against industry as the despoilers of nature. Carson could have, Glotfelty contends, convinced her readership that insects were no the enemy and war was not the answer. As Gotfelty points out, Carson also does not suggest we need to live in peace with insects, but that we need smarter battle plans and better generals. These are the alternative methods of control Carson proposes in the final chapter.
My favorite quotation from Glotfelty's chapter: Silent Spring likewise creates a bipolar, melodramatic picture, with the pesticide industry and its henchmen in the Department of Agriculture on one side; Carson and a few heroic biologists and concerned citizens on the other; and with fainting nature and the unsuspecting American public costarring as damsels in distress" (163).
In the final chapter, M. Jimmie Killingsworth and Jacqueline S. Palmer examine the parallels between Carson's work and the genre of science fiction. "Our aim is to take science fiction seriously, not as a substitute for science, but as a response to science tha tcontributes to the development of myths. And we treat myths not as the cultural equivalent of lies, mistakes, or superstitutions that scientific enlightenment is committed to destroy but as collective narratives reaching beyond the boundaries of any specialized body of knoweldge and touching the heart of a society's emotional, spiritual, and intellectual consciousness" (175-176).
Lear counters the image of Carson as a loner by highlighting the importance of her many female friendships and the reasons she cultivated a separation between her public and private life while promoting Silent Spring . She speaks specifically of Carson's loving relationship with Dorothy Freeman.
Read
June 18, 2022This collection was super interesting to me! Getting into the particulars of how Carson made Silent Spring so effective, the world it was written in, its relationship to science fiction/apocalyptic narratives, all deepened my understanding of the text (and its reception). Definitely going to keep reading about Silent Spring and Carson (and now i’m 👀 about the various biographies I’ve heard about, because the afterword went into how many male biographers projected their ideas about single women onto Carson). I also want to read more about science fiction’s relationship to gothic literature, especially the sci fi that came around following the development of the atomic bomb, so if you need me i’ll be creating another syllabus for myself 😂
February 16, 2013
Silent Spring likewise creates a bipolar, melodramatic picture, with the pesticide industry and its henchmen in the Department of Agriculture on one side; Carson and a few heroic biologists and concerned citizens on the other; and with fainting nature and the unsuspecting American public costarring as damsels in distress.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews