I really enjoyed this book in the beginning. About half way through things started going downhill and by the end, I was just reading to finish the book.
I really enjoyed the connections of the epithets of the different deities. I appreciate the timeline in the back and wish there was a chart of these epithets for easy access.
I find a lot of the arguments compelling and quite frankly have no reason to believe the connections are false.
However, I find Daniélou contradicts himself. In the last couple of pages this is especially apparent when he states, "A true religion cannot be exclusive, cannot claim to hold the only truth, because the divine reality has many aspects and the ways which lead to the divine are innumerable." (pg 233)
While I agree with that statement, I'm not convinced the author does as he has spent many pages arguing that Shivaism is the only true way to the divine. He also goes into detail of how exclusive it is because it does not allow women; even stating Mithraism was a Roman attempt to return Shvaism, and Mithraism was quite exclusive!
The worst part of the book was Chapter 9, Rites and Practices. He goes into detail about rituals which sound an awful lot like rape to me. And if practicing this religion requires drinking or bathing in fecal matter and body fluids, that's a big "no thank you" from me.
At first I thought he was really arguing for a unity among all people because all religion had the same root, but I don't find he stuck to this and instead drifted into a diatribe about the "one true religion."
I still found this book helpful and thought provoking.