"The fox's perceived villainy has much to do with our attitude to the earth and the way we treat it. The fox is a problem only in so far as it affects our own interests - and that problem is often exaggerated to suit other agendas. Intentions of spite and malevolence have been projected onto the fox for many years when, in fact, it is simply a wild animal, acting according to its nature."
Nail and head. Lucy Jones has succeeded in writing one of the most important books in contemporary society, on a subject very much at the heart of what she deems as 'fierce, emotional warfare'. If you're not convinced that the fox is worthy of such accolades, perhaps it would be worth asking one of the 585,000 people who have signed a petition objecting to the proposed re-legalisation of fox-hunting with hounds. The numbers speak for themselves.
Jones writes in the vein of a weathered journalist whose credentials seep into her words; every sentence, claim, and statement is well balanced, cited, and serves a purpose to her intention which presumably is to present a factual, objective study on Vulpes vulpes (our native red fox) and leave the reader to make up their mind on what fate should befall them. Prior to reading, it is perhaps tempting to cry 'bias' in favour of the fox on the writer's part - so it is then very surprising to learn that Jones herself is from a hunting family!
Jones examines the fox in astonishing detail through six thorough and comprehensive chapters, from the depiction of foxes in literature - Shakespeare, Chaucer, Aesop, Dahl - to the sensationalist mobbing of our urbanised encounters with them by the British media. You know the sort: 'monster fox kidnaps granny and kills twenty others' Daily Mail-type shenanigans that lack both scientific validity and, well, common sense.
She highlights many of the negative connotations that the word 'fox' and its derivatives currently and historically have had: 'cunning as a fox', 'foxy', 'outfox', 'to smell a fox', etc - all of the above portray an instinctive, wild animal as a sly, devious thief who engages in villainy and debauchery. To put it in logical light, it is absolute nonsense but sadly has endured over the years. If anything else, the fox is possibly the most anthropomorphised animal in existence.
The varying behaviours of the fox are also put under a magnifying glass with some help from fox-keepers, conservationists, even pest controllers (some that are paid to kill urban foxes) and the light that is shed on this equal parts shy and brazen animal is fascinating. For example, the main portion of a foxes diet in Spring consists of earthworms; foxes, in general, dislike the taste of lamb fat and only take lambs if there is nothing else to eat; there have been studies that suggest that foxes are able to use Earth's magnetic field to hunt; I could go on. The details 'unearthed' in the book are gratifying, surprising and really quite extraordinary.
The writing really comes to the fore however in the last third - dedicated entirely to fox-hunting as a 'traditional county sport' and that sport's antithesis: the Hunt Saboteurs Association. For the sake of objectivity, Jones attends a hunting meet - trail hunting, of course (cue the eye roll) - but also a group of hunt sabs doing what they do best (where a HSA member was casually punched in the face by a terrierman - a common occurrence, we hear). She goes to quite literally painful lengths to explore the argument for and against from many walks of life - and it's refreshing, interesting even. But personally I could find no justification whatsoever to continue or re-legalise an activity as barbaric as fox-hunting. Foxes have no significant effect on diminishing wildlife (reduced habitats, pollution and a changing climate perhaps does) and, as for the carnage in the chicken coop - the fox is a predator, and any predator is an opportunist. It is utter folly to judge a fox as we would a human. Perhaps, and this is a shocking notion, the owners of livestock should take responsibility for that livestock. Just a thought. I truly believe in 20 years we will look back at fox-hunting as we do to bear-baiting and otter-hunting in this country. Outdated, unnecessary, a fatuous bloodsport. After all, has there ever been as regressive a social construct as 'tradition'? Lest we forget that slaves were once a tradition also. Keep the ban.