A few months ago I started reading The Pained Bird by Jerzy Kosinski and I found myself astonished by the portrayal of a folk doctor Olga the Wise One as being exquisitely knowledgeable and outrageously "out there" in her beliefs. She takes in a young outsider and he watches her treat patients with skill that, in its way, borders on magic. On the other hand, the boy has to suffer the troubling mystical and xenophobic notions that seem to come hand-in-hand with the medical knowledge based in science. Because he is darker than the other country folk, he is considered to be "possessed" by an evil spirit, and this causes him not only to be mistrusted, but also to mistrust himself. A lot of us might know in a logical sense that stories aren't true, but they can still affect our belief systems in damaging and dangerous ways. To a degree, there are many whose belief systems are still very much stuck in the middle ages and probably long before that, because the power of stories is profound and often keeps us from unlearning nonsense and relearning updated ways of looking at the world. (It's hard to let go of a flat earth, because it's not as good for Gods to play frisbe with. Gods play frisbee, not soccer!!!)
But, back to the Kosinsky and Olga the Wise who is at once a deeply intelligent scientist and a peddler of bizarre and mistaken but not uncommon xenophobic mystical notions. And I got to thinking, it makes sense to a degree that these things could come together, folk beliefs about the supernatural etc. and rigorous science, an odd but not incomprehensible marriage of convenience. One small example, strangers might bring 'new' diseases with them that could harm people who have not built immunity to them (I should know...I live near Amherst, a place named for the guy who used Smallpox as biological warfare against the Native Americans) and so folk medicine and superstition ('foreign' people being possessed by evil spirits, i.e.) might grow tangled together and stay tangled for a good many generations (or eons.)
So how do we look at ancient texts and old myths and try to parse out what in them resembles truth. Of course, this isn't a new line of inquiry. The first thing that comes to my mind is biblical historians trying to prove that things that happen in sacred texts have some basis in historical reality. And I imagine there is a long history of people studying other mythologies and folklores for hints of 'real' history and science.
Kaplan doesn't go too deeply into the work of his predecessors and I think it would be a much better book if it gave a bit more credit to those who came before him, not just because it's a nice thing to do, but also because it would strengthen and deepen and add seasoning to his arguments. This book is a quick romp through a subject matter that could go on and on and on. The 'quick romp' factor accounts for some of this books charms and some of its drawbacks.
For example, in the opening chapter, he breaks up "healing" into "Prayers, Sacred Pools, Regeneration, and Holy Eyeliner" and twenty pages later we're in the next chapter. "Transformations" goes on for another mere twenty pages, including a two-page verse excerpt from Ovid's Metamorphoses about Hermaphrodite and another couple of paragraphs of Kaplan explaining his childhood rebellion and its relationship to his art museum experiences (unlike other rebelling kids, he didn't "drink" and "drive too fast" but rather, since his mother was a Renaissance scholar, he decided to go for Baroque.) His discussion of transgender folks leaves quite a bit to be desired. The one good thing I can say about this chapter is that he mentions that hormone blockers have been used therapeutically with kids successfully and with little to no side-effects for many years for conditions not related to being trans. That's nice because some people worry trans kids shouldn't use hormone blockers because it might "stunt" their growth, etc. It's safe, people. And I can't tell you how often I wish they were available when I was a kid (along with some more supportive parents).
If you are looking for a thorough, scholarly and well-contextualized address of the topics addressed in this book (mythology, folklore, folk medicine, magic, science...), this isn't it. If you are looking for an interesting and intelligent book that touches upon many topics and includes the author having conversations with quite a few experts on intersting subjects, such as whether looking at the livers of animals for the sake of prognostication might have any real-life scientific merit, well, you're in luck.
This book is more of a 3.5 when I look at it as a whole, but I decided to round up as there are so many wonderful moments scattered throughout.