(note - this review was written several years ago for a private site)
I have to admit that this has been one of the more depressing things I have ever read, provoking a reaction similar to what I experienced while watching Hotel Rwanda. It also provided some insights, which directly challenged the received wisdom that I had accumulated from other sources. Turns out I can't trust JT Edson.
The story
Wright looks at the effects of the conquest upon what he deems to be the five major societies or states that existed at the time of contact. The five groups were the Incans, Maya, Aztecs, Cherokee, and Iroquois, each representing a different type of state, ranging from loose tribal federation to centralised Imperial power. Each of the five groups is examined at three different periods in their history of contact, and their progress or decline noted. The key observation being that whenever this decline has been stabilised or slowed the indigenous group again suffers European (initially external or settler) attack or oppression. It just never seems to stop.
Wright’s Thesis:
1. Cultural genocide was practiced by the occupying Europeans, often till quite recently. Offenders include the occupying power, the local state and the various Christian religious groups, specifically the Catholic Church, and more recently evangelical Christian movements.
2. The inability of indigenous American populations to throw off the occupying powers in the way that African or Asian colonised peoples did is largely due the massive population loss.
3. In many American countries the occupying European settlers created a regime of racial preference similar to the racist regimes of apartheid South Africa and Southern Rhodesia. Such systems exist to this day, but gather little international attention.
There were three things that surprised me, the scale of the deaths due to imported illnesses, the deliberate cultural genocide, and how long this state of affairs has lasted. The last two of which were especially surprising. I find it incredibly hard to believe that people could systematically destroy other cultures in the way that Wright states, but it apparently did happen. After all, long term occupation and exploitation is hard if the indigenous people are still rebelling.
The most shocking part for me was the stories of the Inca and Aztec, how complete their destruction was, how long they have been brutally oppressed by their occupier. The fact that any part of their culture or history still exists is a surprise, and is probably due to the sheer scale of their populations pre contact. It is similar in scale to the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, the sack of Greater Iran by the Mongols and then the Turks. These societies, populations and quality of life have only really recovered to close to pre contact levels since the mid 20th century, and even then not really.
To be constantly confronted by the raw facts and figures of the conquest of the Americas, to put a number on the dead, to see listed the crimes, that is a shocking thing. As a resident of a settler nation that has recently examined its relationship and history with its indigenous population I should not be really surprised by this book, but I am, probably due to the scale of the events. They totally dwarf anything that I have read about in New Zealand or Australia (this is not meant to insult indigenous readers).
You want to hope that the litany of tragedy lies in the past, because the modern world would not allow such events to still occur, but it is not to be. The Canadian Mohawk rebellion of 1990, then the Zapatista revolt in Mexico are but two examples of the dissatisfaction that still exists. We may live in the 21st century, but the crimes of the early Modern era still haunt us.
Conclusion
Wright delivers this information extremely well, using a combination of emotive language and cold, hard facts. The three-era/five-group structure lets Wright keep the events in context to what happened to other groups. This works well, it allows each group’s experiences to reinforce each, it gives a point of comparison. Lest the reader dare think that the terrible events were isolated, that others had it better. The reader is never given the opportunity to think that. To call it compelling reading is an understatement, it is impossible to put down. Read this book if you want to know the sordid truth about the colonisation of the Americas.