I did not know the writer when I started reading the book. But I had great expectations from it because of its title. However, unfortunately my expectations were not met.
The Qur'an Majid is Islam's divine text, revelations from Allah Rabbul Alamin; its single source of laws and knowledge. After the death of the Prophet SA: this is what is left as a guidance for the billion Muslims around the world.
However, a small number of people, including Muslims, have learnt that Khalifa Uthman ibn Affan Ra:, the third Caliph of Islam, has adulterated the Text, altered the order of the Chapters, or even truncated it to suit his and some other's political ambitions.
Some authors wrote books about that; in fact I am reading one right now after finishing Mrs. Mattson's book: 'The Silent Qur'an and the Speaking Qur'an: Scriptural Sources of Islam Between History and Fervor' by Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali.
I have watched documentaries, read articles and learnt otherwise that an alternative Qur'an Majid might be a possibility. There was one found in Yemen in 1972 - fondly called the 'The Sanaa Mushaf'.
I took part in an Academia.edu discussion forum last week where one was trying to argue the same. I have watched reputed BBC journalist Rageh Omaar who tried to establish that Mecca is not the true centre, or Qiblah as the Muslims call it, of Islam - the mention of Olive groves in the Qur'an Majid suggests that the Qiblah would be somewhere further North, somewhere in the fertile crescent - the land surrounding the Mediterranean sea.
As a devout Muslim, I am keenly interested about the Qur'an Majid. This is my one true compass, medicine in ailment, friend in sadness, savior in distress. I want to know if I have invested my life in a falsehood.
So I read Mrs. Ingrid Mattson's book with great expectations, hoping to learn whether my Quran Majid is a real one or not.
At Chapter 3 the Author addressed the paramount question: the transmission of the Qur'an Majid from the guardianship of the Prophet SA:; to us the billions of Muslims. There she did something that is worse than saying that it is false - she planted seeds of confusion in the minds of her readers.
In the Section of that Chapter named aptly' The Prophet and the First Collection of the Qur’an' Mrs. Mattson states:
"Umar advised Abu Bakr to order the Qur’an to be “collected” so that it would not disappear with the reciters. Abu Bakr hesitated to do “what the Prophet had never done,” but eventually relented, and appointed Zayd ibn Thabit, one of the Prophet’s most reliable scribes, to undertake the task."
...
"Zayd collected recitations and written texts of all the suras, and transcribed them on loose sheets of paper (suhuf). Abu Bakr kept these pages until he died, when they were transferred to the next caliph, ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab. Before ‘Umar died in 24/644, he deposited the papers with his daughter (and the Prophet’s widow) Hafsa, who kept them until another project to transcribe the Qur’an was undertaken."
As a reference the Author says at the beginning of this 'story' that "Islamic tradition holds that" without mentioning any particular Hadith, books or papers, although she provided 70 notes for her writing in that Chapter.
This piece of information is the umbilical cord of the Qur'an Majid - from the hands of the Prophet SA:; it comes to the hands of the Muslims after the Prophet SA:'s death - and we see that there is no proof of that information in Mrs. Ingrid Mattson's book.
What a reader would think of that?
There are many more to write but I have decided that the Author does not deserve a closer scrutiny after such a failure. So I shall not mention them.
I wish the Author redemption.