Preface Introduction The Letters 1861-69: Student Years, Schopenhauer & Wagner 1869-76: 1st Years at Basel, Wagner & the Break w/Wagner 1877-82: End of the Professorship, Lou Salome, Genoa 1883-89: Zarathustra, Tranvaluation of Values, Turin Epilogue Indexes
There's nothing particularly special about Middleton's selections from Nietzsche's letters. What one wants is a complete set of all extant correspondence, including the relevant letters of his communicants, with annotations, index and source notes. I read this while taking Hans Siegfried's Nietzsche course at Loyola University Chicago.
باورم نمیشه دارم به نامههای زیبای نیچه یک میدم اما اصلا نفهمیدم چی خوندم نگارش ، ترجمه ، ویراستاری و درکل بخوام بگم املای کتاب درحد بچهی اول دبستان بود حرص خوردم و خوندم و یک امتیاز هم فقط به خاطر گل روی نیچه است و بس 😂😐
A formatting nightmare. The text blends in with the footnotes, oftentimes quite long disruptions which makes you have to go back and pick up the broken thread. After a while I just gave up. What I had read did not compel me to go forward or put up with the sloppy composition of the book. The letters (or what I had read) were pretty boring.
I found the footnotes and also the index particularly useful, springing between the letters as an amateur detective. What was I looking for? In short reflection, I've seen sentiments to mirror, and other signs to watch out for.
دو دلیل برای خوندن این کتاب وجود داره: ۱- مجذوب نیچه باشید. ۲- به نامه خوندن علاقه داشته باشید. دلیل دیگهای برای خوندنش وجود نداره و مطلب خاصی توش نیست.
At the start, I would wonder aloud what young Fritz was going to complain about that day - by the end, even as his mind unravels, he finds his footing and barks to his march. Reading Kant punishes a lazy mind - by contrast, N is addictive because he is a robust writer - as daring as any and not unlike an infection, spreading fever. Before you know it, the volts are flying off the ends of your hairs. Overall, I still can't say his letters were an exciting read - but informative, illuminating, yes. Poor Fritz and his (lifelong) physical and psychological suffering - punished, as it were, from nearly the start, with a profoundly lonely life. Painfully, powerfully lonely. This leads to a final question - was it worth it? Simplistic to ask, yes - but it comes through the correspondence like a white hot wire. Fritz was very aware of the nature of his own suffering - but he also believed the will to honesty was the highest virtue. So what was it? Ultimately? I quote the man himself, outside of his letters: "What are man's truths ultimately? Merely his irrefutable errors." The poor man needed a good woman. Anyway, some excerpts:
"One is honest about oneself either with a sense of shame or with vanity."
Letter to Gast, 8/14/1881: "Ah, my friend, sometimes the idea runs through my head that I am living an extremely dangerous life, for I am one of those machines which can explode. The intensities of my feeling make me shudder and laugh; several times I could not leave my room for the ridiculous reason that my eyes were inflamed - from what? Each time, I had wept too much on my previous day's walk, not sentimental tears but tears of joy; I sang and talked nonsense, filled with a glimpse of things which put me in advance of all other men."
Letter to Salome, 1882: "Lastly, my dear Lou, the old, deep, heartfelt plea: become the being you are! First, one has the difficulty of emancipating oneself from one's chains; and, ultimately, one has to emancipate oneself from this emancipation too! Each of us has to suffer, though in greatly differing ways, from the chain sickness, even after he has broken the chains."
Reading his letters is not an efficient way of learning the philosophy of Nietzsche. They are fine for learning about his personality, but bogging one self down in the personality of an author and trivia about his life - what is the point in that?
We have some fine language in here, some interesting thoughts about the unification of Germany, some interesting details about life in the mid to late 1800s, but these letters are not essential reading.