This audiobook, available only on Audible, is more of a blend of a book and a podcast or a news program. It is about the MOVE religion or movement or whatever, founded by John Africa, a movement with elements of animal rights activism mixed with black nationalism, I think. MOVE seems fascinating, and I wish I knew more about it.
That said the writing of this book was shitty. Above, I said that MOVE was a mix of animal activism and black nationalism, I think. The reason I said I think was because I got through 20% of the book and I still do not really have a good idea of what MOVE is all about. The writing is shitty because it does not do the basic things that an author has to do, explain what the book is about. Who is MOVE? What do they stand for? I still don’t know.
The book has other problems. It does something common amongst amateur historians, who feel that they have to explain everything, even if they have no evidence for why something happened. Early on in the book, the authors state that John Africa went to fight in Korea as an infantryman and that might have been the reason he started MOVE. They don’t know but it “was enough to mess with your head” and lots of people believed that they should not be going over to the other side of the world “just to kill other minorities.” The authors then interview Temple University journalism professor Linn Washington tells us that, “What a person does is a confluence of the influences and experiences that they have had so I imagine in some way that military experience played on him.”
Let’s count the problems with this kind of writing.
First, the authors admit they do not have any evidence for Africa’s experience in Korea effecting his founding of MOVE, but they still push that explanation, despite the fact that the two were separated by more than a decade. It is fine if a historian cannot explain why something happened. It is not acceptable to shoehorn in explanations just to have an explanation.
Second, he calls the Koreans in Korea “minorities,” but Korea is one of the most ethnically homogeneous nations on earth. The Koreans in Korea are the spitting definition of what is not a minority. I recognize the authors just used the term “minority” as a political correct term for what they really meant, which was “non-white folk,” but this still indicates a laziness and a lack of thorough thinking on the authors’ parts.
Finally, this quote that they pulled from Washington is so weird. In trying to make the reach for how Africa was pushed by his brutalizing experience as an infantryman in Korea, the authors interview Washington and pull this quote (worth repeating): “What a person does is a confluence of the influences and experiences that they have had so I imagine in some way that military experience played on him.” In other words, actions have consequences for people’s lives…what more asinine bromide could one come up with. 1 + 1 = 2, perhaps?
MOVE seems like an interesting topic worthy of a serious treatment by historians. This is not that book.