I really enjoyed the last four of these Maigrets - the first, Maigret in Montmartre, was not as good, I would have given it 4 stars.
Thumbnails of the 5 books:
Maigret in Montmartre - Lapointe falls in love with Arlette, a striptease dancer with a uniquely mesmerizing quality...
Maigret's Mistake - Louise Filon is murdered in her classy apartment in the Avenue Carnot. Her boyfriend Pierrot the saxophonist was seen there the evening of the murder - but they are both Montmartre types and the reason for her murder revolves around Professor Gouin who keeps her in this flat.
Maigret Has Scruples - Xavier Marton, who sells electric trains at the Magasins du Louvre, is convinced that his wife wants to poison him with white phosphide. Gisèle Marton works in a fine lingerie shop in the Rue Saint-Honoré, for a man named Harris...her sister Jenny lives in their home. But who murders whom, and how? "There exists, between responsibility and irresponsibility, an indefinite zone, a realm of shadows into which it is dangerous to venture."
Maigret and the Reluctant Witnesses - Léonard Lachaume is killed on the Quai de la Gare, at Ivry, near the Lachaume biscuit factory. The Lachaume family is mute, having staged a supposed break-in to account for the murder, and it turns out they have gone to great lengths to keep the bankrupt factory going and avoid facing the truth of their family's decline.
Maigret Goes to School - Maigret is lured to Charente by the hope of oysters and champagne, but his "reason" is to help the determinedly honest schoolmaster, Joseph Gastin, who is being framed for the murder of an unpleasant old lady in the small town of Saint-André-sur-Mer. The villagers close ranks and condemn Gastin, but Maigret sniffs out the solution among the local schoolboys...
From Maigret's Mistake:
"Everything the Professor had said from the start, Maigret himself believed deep within him. Their ideas about men and their motives were not very far apart.
The difference lay in the attitudes with which they faced the problem.
Gouin only made use of what Maigret would have called pure reason. Whereas the inspector was trying...
He would have been hard put to it to define what he was trying to do. Perhaps from understanding people he derived not merely a feeling of pity, but also a kind of affection.
Gouin observed them from on high.
Maigret placed himself on the same level as they."
A collection worth owning, a kaleidoscopic view of Maigret.