Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology” as Want to Read:
Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology

3.88  ·  Rating details ·  75 ratings  ·  7 reviews
Radical Orthodoxy is a new wave of theological thinking that aims to reclaim the world by situating its concerns and activities within a theological framework, re-injecting modernity with theology.
This collection of papers is essential reading for anyone eager to understand religion, theology, and philosophy in a completely new light.
Hardcover, 285 pages
Published October 15th 1998 by Routledge (first published 1998)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Radical Orthodoxy, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Radical Orthodoxy

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
3.88  · 
Rating details
 ·  75 ratings  ·  7 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Jacob Aitken
Jun 21, 2015 rated it really liked it
EDIT: I am far more critical of the Radical Orthodoxy project than I was when I wrote this review. Their genealogical critique of Scotus has been refuted and some of the essays, if not bizarre, are downright troubling (Graham Ward). Further, Jamie Smith has decisively "cut Radical Orthodoxy to the bone." But here goes:

I will write this review in topical format, rather than reviewing chapter-by-chapter. The authors in this book propose a new theological vision critiquing the modern project by dra
Jacob Aitken
I will write this review in topical format, rather than reviewing chapter-by-chapter. The authors in this book propose a new theological vision critiquing the modern project by drawing upon Patristic and Medieval sources.

The authors suggest that Western Christendom experienced an intellectual fall from grace around 1300. This dealt with the nature of “being” (or ontology). Previously, for the “church fathers or early scholastics, both faith and reason are included in the more generic fr
Nov 18, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
An amazing collection of essays centered around the (loosely Anglican) Radical Orthodox theology. Difficult to summarize justly, some prominent themes include a rejection of the univocity of Being (a misstep largely laid at the feet of Duns Scotus which allegedly opened the door for voluntarism, nominalism, and modernity) and a return to Thomas' view of theology as the Queen of the sciences (without, however, rejecting wholesale everything that comes after Thomas). The ability of the Radical Ort ...more
Aug 08, 2012 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
This was a collection of hits and misses for me. Some of the essays were of extreme value for me personally, while others were paragons of boredom. Hemming's essay on Heidegger is actually one of the best arguments for a developed Mariology I, a born and raised Protestant, have ever read. Hanby's essay on Augustine was devotional as much as intellectual reading. The last three essays on aesthetics, perception and music were all great. But, others were almost painful to get through. Ward's essay ...more
Feb 17, 2010 rated it liked it
This collection of essays has a couple of keepers (The City, or Displaced Bodies, for example), as well as some not so great contributions. While it was designed such that chapters could be independently read of one another, some should probably be read in succession to get the full impact. I don't know that I would call myself much of a John Milbank fan, but it presented new ways of looking at theology in postmodern times.
E Ei
Sep 10, 2008 rated it it was ok
hard ones..
Alden Bass
rated it it was amazing
Aug 24, 2007
J.W.D. Nicolello
A mixed bag and another book I would have devoured some years ago. I can seriously see this book being read by some inspired friends and causing epiphany left and right for five weeks over cheap wine, the friends then never to speak of this book again all of a sudden. It is not something I can imagine ever takino down from a shelf to revisit, nor something to reccomend, lest one have to speak of the thing more than once in these couple of days we call 'Life.'
rated it really liked it
Apr 05, 2017
rated it really liked it
Jun 09, 2013
Robert Tessmer
rated it liked it
Apr 24, 2013
Tapji Garba
rated it it was ok
Dec 17, 2013
Troy Hammond
rated it it was amazing
Dec 07, 2013
Freya Gilbert
rated it it was amazing
Dec 01, 2012
Sam Eccleston
rated it really liked it
Jul 29, 2015
Mike Elliott
rated it really liked it
Apr 23, 2010
Kevin Vail
rated it really liked it
Jan 26, 2014
Kyle Keen
rated it really liked it
Apr 07, 2014
Mary Vardazarian
rated it it was amazing
Aug 29, 2015
Eric Lee
rated it really liked it
Feb 05, 2011
rated it it was amazing
Mar 03, 2014
rated it liked it
Feb 01, 2012
rated it really liked it
Sep 10, 2014
Daniel Klawitter
rated it it was amazing
Nov 13, 2013
rated it really liked it
Mar 07, 2009
rated it it was amazing
Oct 25, 2007
Dan Patterson
rated it it was ok
May 06, 2012
Martin Phillips
rated it really liked it
Dec 13, 2017
Derek Kubilus
rated it really liked it
Apr 24, 2013
Troy Hammond
rated it it was amazing
Dec 07, 2013
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Professor John Milbank is Professor in Religion, Politics and Ethics and the Director of the Centre of Theology and Philosophy at the University of Nottingham. He has previously taught at the Universities of Lancaster, Cambridge and Virginia. He is the author of several books of which the most well-known is Theology and Social Theory and the most recent Being Reconciled: Ontology and Pardon. He is ...more
“The theological perspective of participation actually saves the appearances by exceeding them. It recognizes that materialism and spiritualism are false alternatives, since if there is only finite matter there is not even that, and that for phenomena really to be there they must be more than there. Hence, by appealing to an eternal source for bodies, their art, language, sexual and political union, one is not ethereally taking leave of their density. On the contrary, one is insisting that behind this density resides an even greater density – beyond all contrasts of density and lightness (as beyond all contrasts of definition and limitlessness). This is to say that all there is only is because it is more than it is. (...)

This perspective should in many ways be seen as undercutting some of the contrasts between theological liberals and conservatives. The former tend to validate what they see as the modern embrace of our finitude – as language, and as erotic and aesthetically delighting bodies, and so forth. Conservatives, however, seem still to embrace a sort of nominal ethereal distancing from these realities and a disdain for them. Radical orthodoxy, by contrast, sees the historic root of the celebration of these things in participatory philosophy and incarnational theology, even if it can acknowledge that premodern tradition never took this celebration far enough. The modern apparent embrace of the finite it regards as, on inspection, illusory, since in order to stop the finite vanishing modernity must construe it as a spatial edifice bound by clear laws, rules and lattices. If, on the other hand, following the postmodern options, it embraces the flux of things, this is an empty flux both concealing and revealing an ultimate void. Hence, modernity has oscillated between puritanism (sexual or otherwise) and an entirely perverse eroticism, which is in love with death and therefore wills the death also of the erotic, and does not preserve the erotic as far as an eternal consummation. In a bizarre way, it seems that modernity does not really want what it thinks it wants; but on the other hand, in order to have what it thinks it wants, it would have to recover the theological. Thereby, of course, it would discover also that that which it desires is quite other than it has supposed”
More quotes…