This book is a small treasure trove of information about the world of Ancient Egypt. Barry Kemp, a respected Egyptologist, apparently only focuses on the cult of the dead, but indirectly he portrays almost the entire Ancient Egyptian culture. What strikes me time and time again is how we should not look at that culture through our own 21st century eyes, because then we are doing it an absolute injustice. To address just one essential issue: the question "what did the Egyptians believe in?" turns out to be flatly wrong, at least if we understand that “believing in” in our Western sense, namely as a well-defined, homogeneous view on an absolute reality, cast in beliefs, coupled with equally precise ethics and expressed in eternally fixed rituals. Kemp constantly emphasizes how the Egyptians saw reality as something fluid, in which the earthly and the super- or subterranean flow together, presented in the most diverse forms, with constant shifts in meaning and in constant evolution. “The Egyptians had created a complex and frightening spiritual world. Over the centuries they added ever more details and variations: caverns and gates, ways of torturing and destroying the enemies of the sun - god, and symbols of how the sun - god continually renewed his existence, a metaphor for personal renewal. Did any of it really exist? In the end they could neither know nor not know. They had not developed a theology: the concepts, the vocabulary and the argumentative skills to argue for or against their spiritual world and so to develop a level of unshakeable belief or absolute doubt. Hence the nervous, constantly shifting perspective of the Book of the Dead. It is an articulation of worry and uncertainty as much as of belief.” Kemp indicates that this view is much more like a very early form of relativism, a view of the world that comes suspiciously close to what we have come to call postmodernism.
There is one characteristic, however, that recurs almost invariably: life after death is an inhospitable journey, in a menacing world, full of dangers. “The Otherworld was not a comforting place, an idyllic world, a paradise. It was full of alarming beings and prospects, all needing to be mastered single-handedly by the reader. There was no kindly savior waiting reassuringly to welcome the dead.” That is why the fear of the underworld dominates almost all iconographic representations of Ancient Egypt, and thus pre-eminently also the Book of the Dead, which is nothing more than a series of spells to get through this perilous journey as best as possible. “The experience of life after death was a continuous dangerous struggle and the Book of the Dead protects spirits of the dead from these dangers. By reading and learning the names and characteristics of the Otherworld and its parts, Egyptians could ward off the evils. Having invented a world of fears, the Egyptians set about creating practical ways to overcome them.” Well, that last thing sure is something that discriminates ancient Egyptians from Mesopotamians: both saw the Otherworld as an unattractive place, but Egyptians sought ways to live (pun intended) with it.
The only suggestion of a somewhat milder fate for the deceased is the judgment, in which the soul of the deceased (the ba) is weighed against the principle of the "ma'at", a complex concept that stands for truth, order and justice. Those who fail this test, await an even grimmer fate of torture and torment by demons. But even the righteous did not have to count on such things as heaven or Elysian fields. Life in Ancient Egypt may have been no fun, but death apparently was even less so.