From Yale professor and bestselling author of How Fascism Works, a searing confrontation with the authoritarian right’s efforts to annihilate public education, silence teachers, and use taxpayer money to undo a century of work to advance social justice action on race, gender, sexuality, and class. Combining historical research with an in-depth analysis of our modern political landscape, Erasing History issues a dire warning for America and the the worst fascist movements of humanity’s past began in schools; the same place so many of today’s right-wing political parties have trained their most vicious attacks. Donald Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson, Ron DeSantis, Vivek Ramaswamy, Vladimir Putin, Turkey’s Recip Erdogan, and Argentina’s Javier Milei have all reached the same conclusion: if you want to roll back the clock on civil rights, equity, and inclusion, a great place to start is in our schools. Yale professor Jason Stanley exposes the true danger of the right’s tactics and traces their inspirations and funding back to some of the most dangerous ideas of human history. He shows that hearts and minds are won in our elementary schools, high schools, and universities—and that governments are currently ill-prepared to do the work of uprooting fascist policies being foisted upon our children through school boards, in courtrooms, and in the boardrooms of the companies trusted to train our teachers and create the materials they’ll share with their students. Deeply informed and urgently needed, this book is a vibrant call to action for lovers of democracy worldwide.
Jason Stanley is the Jacob Urowsky Professor of Philosophy at Yale University. He is the author of five books, including How Propaganda Works, winner of the Prose Award in Philosophy from the Association of American Publishers, and How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them, about which Citizens author Claudia Rankine says: “No single book is as relevant to the present moment.” Stanley serves on the board of the Prison Policy Initiative and writes frequently about propaganda, free speech, mass incarceration, democracy, and authoritarianism for The New York Times, The Washington Post, Boston Review, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and The Guardian.
I want to be reading smut and romance, but this shitty conservative government has me out here reading about fascism. I refuse to ignore what's happening in our country.
“Whether we call them fascist or not, there is widespread agreement that the social and political movements we are witnessing today employ many of the same political tactics and rhetorical techniques that past fascist movements have — conjuring of violent vigilante mobs to threaten those who oppose them, stacking courts with loyalists to a leader or a party, directing hatred against immigrants and LGBTQ citizens, dismantling, reproductive rights, and using education to indoctrinate the young in a narrative of national greatness, rooted in a glorious past.”
“… fascist education works by strategically erasing accounts of history and current events that include a diversity of perspectives, narrowing the scope of what can be taught until students are presented with a single viewpoint, which is formulated specifically to justify and perpetuate a hierarchy value between groups. This narrowing is inconsistent with multi-racial democracy, antithetical to egalitarianism, and carries a possibility of conjuring mass violence.”
“Besides lying, those in power can ban concepts necessary for understanding the world we inhabit, such as structural racism, and institutions, such as the Gulag. They can ban concepts such as human rights or the equality of humankind. They can ban inquiry into the human caused climate change. Those lacking such essential concepts, or knowledge of essential facts, will respond differently to events. Unaware of the range of explanations and options, they can easily be manipulated.”
You would have to be intentionally blinkered to avoid recognizing the fascist-leaning elements in the current United States. Such elements are also alive and well in other parts of the world. This book helps identify the methods employed by fascists. Fascism thrives on ignorance and misinformation. Knowledge is power. This is a useful book. Although short, it is well researched and covers a lot of history. I listened to the audiobook narrated by Dion Graham. He did an excellent job as always.
I received a free copy of this book from the publisher.
Creating a strong sense of grievance with an enemy to blame, and vengeance to gain, is essential to a fascist movement. A common or shared reality must be destroyed and replaced with willful stupidity as freedom from reality itself is the ultimate payoff. The authoritarian project provides a false history or reality by erasing real history and reality. Erasing history is like burning books. Erasing events and deleting words rather than faking events and making up words is more difficult to detect. It is much more difficult to see the real that has been removed than it is the fake that has been added. This absence (a negation) creates a new way of pseudo- knowing (an affirmative). The erasing of history, the negation of reality, and the creation of lies are part of the same fascist project. Changing the well accepted and well understood meaning of words and grammar is part of the revisionist history project. Without a clear and honest understanding of history, reality, and language we cannot understand the world as it exists today.
America The Beautiful
The U.S. population is willingly choosing fascism and authoritarianism without there being an external threat forcing such a choice on the voting public. This is collective willful stupidity sanctified by Christianity. Rage, anger, and despair are just excuses for the willfully stupid racism, misogyny, and bigotry upon which rolling fascism thrives. We see this in the myths created by Vance, the lies told by Musk, and the scapegoating done by Trump. In our current political moment, erasing history has translated into the deleting of government web pages with information on vaccines, veterans care, scientific research, healthcare options, etc. What is left unsaid becomes the main means of manipulation. Another example is the instant deletion of DEI, now consigned to the trash bin, this is disguised as efficiency. Efficiency becomes its own tyranny just as power needs no reason and becomes its own justification. Next, a constitution in crisis will become a constitution erased. Not only do the victors get to write history, but they also get to erase it. For example, the founding of America based on slavery and geocide sanctified by Christianity is not acknowledged. There is an obvious straight-line relationship between fascism and colonialism in that both are dehumanization and genocidal projects just as there is a straight-line relationship between American exceptionalism and American Christian fascism. We now have Christian capitalism sanctifying exploitation and oppression. American fascism is composed of the unique combination of right-wing libertarianism + neoliberalism + social conservatism + religious fundamentalism. The clue to an anti-reality false history narrative is its mythic quality combined with its anti-intellectual methodology and the misconceptions used to reinforce, normalize, and whitewash history which reads like heroic fiction. Totalitarian, authoritarian, fascist, and communist history is characterized by its simplified unitary account of events. Education becomes religious indoctrination or bare bones vocational training. Another obvious example is to erase the history of racism, so nothing needs to be done about racism in the present. History is erased and replaced by invented constructions of history to serve the interests of those who do the erasing and rewriting. An example is erasing the history of the American labor movement resulting in the eight-hour day, the weekend, and living wages. The willing acceptance of lies makes people easy to manipulate and creates a willing acceptance of tyranny and corruption as empowerment.
The Holy Land
Just like its mentor state The U.S., Israel is the very model of a modern major colonial-settler state. Cruelty and colonization are travelling companions and the enemies of democracy and the rule of law. The advancement of civilization becomes the justification for savagery. The Zionists who came to Palestine in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century represented it as an empty land that they had the moral right to occupy based on their religious mythology. The religious mission is always part of the sanctification of any colonial project. The savagery of the colonizers is justified by their religious (Christian, Jewish, Muslim or Hindu) mission. Also, paramount to the colonial project is the erasure of the history and language of the people to be colonized followed by the replacement of each with the colonizer’s history and language. It is much easier to justify the colonization of people with no history and the expropriation of land that is empty. The Israeli strategy in Palestine, and The U.S. did the same with the native American population, is to remove or kill the native population and then represent the land as unoccupied. Having no history is then presented as having no legitimate claim on the present. There is a straight-line from the practices of 19th Century imperialism to 20th Century genocide in Palestine by the Zionist fascists. Colonialism, fascism, nationalism, Zionism, and American exceptionalism are about myth making, same as religion and totalitarianism.
The Dilemma
As Professor Stanley points out, history is about multiple perspectives on the past. I see this as becoming a misused justification for the authoritarian rewrite of history. It is presented as just another reflection or reimagination of the received narrative based on new ‘evidence’ and new ideas. The totalitarian history is justified as just another alternative perspective, or as getting back to the original meaning, but it is the one that erases all other perspectives leaving it as the only authoritative history. That is, the defense of history as consisting of multiple perspectives on the past opens the door for the totalitarian rewrite and erasure of history as just another perspective deserving of equal consideration until it takes over as the only authorized perspective. The idea that history is not static, that it is dynamic and subject to update is an idea defended by Professor Stanley, but this provides the conceptual opening for the dishonest rewrite and erasure of history.
If you’re going to write about the fight for Palestine’s liberation the least you can do is denounce Israel’s horrible regime and be clear about Palestinian oppression. The author kept talking about October 7 as if that was the beginning of this genocide. Yes, he talks about the Nakba but emphasizes october 7 so many times that he makes it seem as if that is the reason for the current situation in that region… be fr Jason
Disappointingly for a book about how history and written narratives can support or reinforce genocidal ideas, this book is surprisingly unable to name the genocide in Palestine or to do anything other than note that Israel’s actions were “arguably genocidal” without actually taking a stance. Somehow manages to spread the myth that there is a war, not a genocide, taking place and that the conflict began on Oct 7 2023, while also mentioning the Nakba (although it states that this is the term the Palestinians use and it is originally referred to as “Israel’s war of independence.” Not bad on a craft level, fairly interesting, and containing a lot of useful information that I enjoyed, but correctly labeling all the other genocides mentioned in the book other than the one occurring in Palestine really dulled my enjoyment of the book. Had it not literally been a book about fascism and history with a big focus on education and reading materials I would’ve had more grace for it, but the fact that it was such an integral part of of the content led to me giving it a 2 instead of a 3- Had it properly named the genocide, I probably would’ve given it a 4.
an informative and eerily timely read. the material is accessible and does a fantastic job at drawing parallels between states that have seen the rise of fa$cism, and how multiple perspectives in history is a corner stone of democracy.
Jason F. Stanley follows-up on his highly popular book How Fascism Works with another jarring tome. He seeks to explore the authoritarian right and its attempts to erase past events that would dilute its power. Targeting public schools, educators, and anyone who seeks to teach history, these authoritarians choose to focus on the present and the future though the lens of this right of centre political core. By doing so, there is little chance for uprisings and second thoughts about what is being spoon fed by the governing body. Thoroughly intriguing and troubling in equal measure, Jason F. Stanley presents a book that many ought to read, if only to see how things are happening in this ever-moving machine. Well worth my time and that of the attentive reader!
Jason F. Stanley offers an ominous warning in his latest book. His stellar historical research and analysis into the far-reaches of the subject matter, Stanley explores the root of modern fascist movements. His transparent conclusion is that schools are forced to foster these far-right views, the plan of most authoritarian governments, to plant seeds at an early age of the populace. Not only do they offer strict views for students to follow, but also ensure that other opinions are erased to keep the education from being too congested. Stanley shows how authoritarians target history and scrub out views that explore topics that clash with the accepted narrative. Rights and equality are washed out, replaced with unity and the exploration of groups seeking to fray the fabric of the core. Stanley presents this in a clear and yet worrisome manner for the reader to explore on their own.
Civil rights in a larger sense are left on the cutting floor by authoritarians. There is no room for varied views and uprising that seek to poke holes in the government centre are vilified as problematic. Look at views of the LGBTQ+ groups that emerge across the world, where they are spun to be ‘against the grain’ of the norm and what is needed in the state. There is no means of building up the core (read: creating traditional families), birthing generations to support the authoritarian foundation. This can be seen across the world in various states that spin it as ‘quelling the protests’ and seeking to pull others on side to show how disruptive protests can be. Stanley extends this to race, gender equality, and class protests, all of which are mocked or downplayed in their importance.
Governments are not fully prepared to put a plug in this authoritarian plan, choosing instead to push back in their own realms, rather than try to educate the larger populace. Here in Alberta (the Canadian province in which I live), the provincial government pushes vilification of various groups and calls them a scourge on the well-running population. They seek to tinker with books available to children, as if they are ‘saving’ them from the evils of alternate views and spin it to their favour. Vilification occurs, those who do not agree push back, but the larger discussion is somewhat silenced. While Canada has constitutional laws around free speech, this is used as a shield by the ignorant to explain why they can say what they want without punitive action. Funny, they do not see the other side of the coin as they seek to mute those who present views that open the eyes of the population against authoritarian views.
Stanley explores various ways in history that authoritarians have pushed their views on groups and sought to herd people together, blinding leading them to extinction or at least diluting social and cultural sentiments. Many countries are guilty of colonisation throughout history, seeking to strengthen the core through unity. This has a place in the discussion, but there is clearly an issue with this that cannot be downplayed. Stanley seeks to ensure the reader does not forget the evils that history has shown us in an effort not to replicate them. While authoritarians seek to scrub out these lessons and turn things away from struggle, other than the fight to purify the core, there is something to be said for history’s way of educating and ensuring an open-eyed sentiment when assessing world events and movements. It’s truly a troubling situation at a time when authoritarian views are permitted to creep into all four corners of the world.
Jason F. Stanley has taken on some hard views in this book, though he does so with confidence. Stanley uses his book to argue the troubles that are continuing to emerge and points are meant to save the world from this whitewashing, His various chapters seek to push views of critical thinking, rather than opening one’s mouth and accepting the pablum. However, even this will be spun as indoctrination, as Stanley is not weak in his presented sentiments. He cuts to the bone to ensure the reader is aware of all that is going on and pulls no punches about where things are headed, given the time. This is a well-paced book for those who possess and open mind and who are eager to understand the subtle movement to place political and social land mines to destroy anything but authoritarian views, As the United States joins other countries in pushing these right-wing views of poisonous sentiments, we must all worry, particularly because their leader is anything but able to handle things properly. It’s time to stand up and take notice, making differences rather than hoping the next person will do so!
Kudos, Mr. Stanley, for this refreshing, yet troubling, look at the world today.
It's nothing I didn't already know (for the most part) but a really good primer on how fascists take control of the historical narrative and turn it toward their own purposes (creating an us vs them structure, a glorious past we must return to, forcibly stamping out the history that contradicts their goals, etc).
A commitment to anti-fascism is also believing in and supporting first amendment rights. The right to free speech (note: not speech without consequences but the right to speak without government censorship), the right to assemble, the right to believe (or not!) in the religion of your choice.
A belief in the first amendment and a commitment to anti-fascism is also a commitment to truth and uplifting historically marginalized voices, particularly those of LGBTQ+ and BIPOC communities.
Thoroughly researched, Jason Stanley presents a book with the possibility of an authoritarian regime in America. He shows how omitting critical parts of shared history in schools and universities is a strategy developed by leaders in the world who have been able to manipulate and control societies.
I thought: “What can he say that I don’t know already?” A lot. He educates the reader with what has happened in the world with countries such as China, India and Russia that are controlled by authoritarians. Some examples were noted with Hitler’s movement during WWII, McCarthy era in America and Putin’s war in Ukraine.
Stanley provided steps that authoritarian governments have used to change democracies with examples from Project 2025. There were classifications that were new to me such as Supremacist Nationalism. It was distressing to read: “America’s greatness stems from both its whiteness and its Christianity” knowing that my ancestor, Thomas Harris, nearly escaped after refusing to join the religious group at a placed called the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the 1600s. I learned more about Hungary’s prime minister Viktor Orbán recent speech at a Dallas, TX political event attacking the idea of a mixed race. This book revealed historical accounts of the Native Americans and Black slavery that is an important part of our past.
The truth can be overwhelmingly depressing. This book entails a lot of information that can hit hard with reality that made me pause with my own questions. How do we fight back for public education and free-speech at universities? The author said American style liberal arts colleges do not exist in authoritarian countries.
Stanley was raised with ancestors who suffered greatly from Hitler and Stalin. He has spent years studying the effects of an authoritarian government and has presented a solid analysis of his findings in this book. He provides evidence of what’s happening in America and helps the reader to understand how we are moving in a direction of Christianity in southern schools and erasing parts of history that can later be manipulated.
The author has continued the work of his late father, Manfred Stanley, a Syracuse professor who taught about the meanings of democratic citizenship. Our world is changing with Artificial Intelligence and the massive amounts of internet news along with the bias news from the media. It’s important that we keep informed with the truthful past and present.
My thanks to Atria Books and NetGalley for allowing me to read an advanced copy of this book with an expected release date of September 10, 2024.
Na Goodreads znalazłam taki komentarz do tej książki: „I want to be reading smut and romance, but this shitty conservative government has me out here reading about fascism. I refuse to ignore what’s happening in our country”. I ja również wolałabym czytać zupełnie inną literaturę niż książkę opisującą obrzydliwe mechanizmy manipulacji stosowane przez faszystów do wymazywania niewygodnych dla nich faktów historycznych, które nie wpisują się w ich narrację. Jednak podobnie jak autorka powyższego komenatarza, nie mogę ignorować szerzenia się propagandy, która pogłębia podziały społeczne, podważa znaczenie nauki, ogranicza dostęp do rzetelnej edukacji, a w konsekwencji zatrzymuje, a nawet cofa całe grupy społeczne w rozwoju. I co najistotniejsze, nie ważne gdzie obecnie żyjemy, faszyzm ma realny wpływ na nasze życie i nie możemy dopuścić, by miał jeszcze większe, a żeby potrafić z nim walczyć musimy znać jego metody.
I tu cały na biało wchodzi Jason Stanley, który w bardzo przystępny sposób i na przykładach czy to z przeszłości czy z teraźniejszości rozkłada faszystów na czynniki pierwsze. Co ważne, nie pisze tylko o swoim kraju (USA), ale również o przykładach z bliższego nam poletka. Autor próbuje odpowiedzieć na pytanie dlaczego faszyści najbardziej zajadle atakują mniejszości, np. osoby transpłciowe czy całą społeczność LGBTQ+ lub imigrantów. Wykłada dlaczego autokraci boją się edukacji, zakazują niektórych książek i karmią swoich wyborców strachem i teoriami spiskowymi. Podkreśla również to, że faszyzm jest nierozerwalnie związany z kolonializmem, przywołując przykłady historyczne, ale wskazując też kolonialny faszyzm dziejący się na naszych oczach, polegający na wymazywaniu historii ludności zamieszkujących okupowane ziemie, odbierając im prawa do pamięci, tożsamości i swojej narracji historycznej.
To bardzo ważna książka na nasze czasy (niestety) i bardzo wam ją rekomenduję.
Honestly, this is one of the most disappointing books I’ve read this year. I opened it hoping to gain a lot of new information, but I was instead bombarded with unresearched, one-sided narratives. The author seemed to have a preset narrative in mind and simply collected sources that supported their own views.
I found that the author relies heavily on sources that only support a single point of view, completely lacking perspective from different sources. For me, it's a real issue when so many statements are cited using news articles from outlets like the New York Times and BBC, which I find says a lot about their authenticity.
I also felt that the content at times even lacked proper research and citations, with some arguments feeling completely baseless and without a reliable source. While a few points were well-made, I thought the book as a whole was largely a single perspective with a noticeable lack of thorough research.
I honestly expected more. I think the book would have had a real in-depth feel if the author had experienced things firsthand rather than treating news articles as the ultimate truth. To me, it feels like a shame to see such a missed opportunity for a truly balanced and insightful work.
The book is Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future by Jason Stanley. The book is scheduled to be published on September 10.
I know that certain factions have insisted on a revised of history. It never made any sense to me. But that is probably because I am an American. The government could insist that something was true and maybe even force the education department to go along with it.
But in a democracy there would always be a those who voiced another opinion. And as Americans we would be free to decide who to believe. But what if we were not be free to disagree with the government version of history. There was only 1 acceptable version. And that was designed to make us believe what the government wants us to believe.
In Erasing History, Jason Stanley discusses how and why rewriting history is part of authoritarian and fascist governments method to gain power and eliminate democracy. This has happened in many counties around the world. So now I understand why they want us to believe their version of history and how they use it to enhance there power over the people,
It is happening in the United States and must be stopped if we would like to remain a free country.
Several years ago I reviewed a book called The Death of Democracy: Hitler’s Rise to Power and the Downfall of the Weimar Republic by Benjamin Carter Hett.
I was stuck in particular by the statement:
“among the Weimar Republic’s more fatal defects was that millions of its people deeply believed things that were verifiably untrue.”
This is true in America today. I closed my review by asking:
Is history repeating itself? It is not exactly the same but some things seem pretty close.
This is one of the worst ones I've read in a while. Stanley is so myopic he's a character in the Odyssey.
He's not all wrong about the things he says and there were one or two facts I appreciated but he only looked at the issue from one side. Of course, it those were his parameters it would be an alright nook. But he moves on from describing just fascism and contends that anyone who doesn't take a liberal arts approach to education is a fascist. Moreover, he refuses to admit that anyone else ever uses the education system to force their message on youths. In fact he categorically denies it. I don't take a side here but if you think one side is pure evil and one side is angelic in their altruism, you're not really thinking critically.
It's a blindly one sided view and it drifts from facts and figures to wild allegations and baseless accusations. Just a testament to a non-scientific approach politics and political thinking.
Do not bother with this, you won't learn anything and unless you ascribe exactly to Stanley's worldview, you'll be bored and annoyed.
An educational, credible and well-researched resource to explore the concepts of fascism, how it works, how it develops, and ways to combat it. I learned an extraordinary amount from this book, and I encourage everyone to read it, now more than ever. Regardless of your feelings on the topic, this movement is prevalent today around the globe. Understanding it through learning, discussion, and research is the most effective and powerful way to clarify personal views, find the courage to challenge modes of thinking and recognize -as well as resist- the presence of these ideals in the modern world. Education is the most powerful thing we can do for ourselves. Let's utilize it. Read this book, and expand yours.
The book connects a lot of dots in a compelling way, but most of the people reading it won’t be surprised by it, and most of the people who should read it won’t.
The New York mayoral primary offers a chilling case study of the very thesis laid out in Erasing History: that fascism thrives not through brute strength alone, but through careful manipulation of public memory, fear, and the erasure of inconvenient truths.
Zohran Mamdani’s historic primary victory—despite being outspent 20-to-1—is a testament to how powerful grassroots movements rooted in popular, material policies can be. And yet, instead of celebration, his win has been met with vitriol from both the right and the political establishment. The right has resorted to predictable but dangerous tactics: painting him as an outsider, calling for his deportation, and claiming immigrants are “overrunning” the country. These tropes aren’t new—they’re a century-old strategy to stoke white status anxiety while deflecting blame away from the true culprits of economic suffering: the oligarchs consolidating wealth and power.
In their quest to rewrite history, today’s fascists want us to forget that New York has always been a city of immigrants. They fabricate a mythic, racially “pure” past that never existed, and then scapegoat immigrants for the modern crises of housing, healthcare, and affordability—crises created by the very people pointing fingers.
Instead of addressing Mamdani’s policies—rent relief for 2 million New Yorkers, public grocery stores to combat price gouging, free public transit—the opposition smears him with racialized attacks. Why? Because these policies are wildly popular. So they pivot to what the fascist playbook demands: fear, division, and manufactured cultural panic. As fascists whip up outrage about immigrants, they quietly pass dystopian legislation: expanding the surveillance state, gutting social services, and handing even more money to the military-industrial complex.
Take the proposed “Alligator Alcatraz”—a grotesque immigrant detention center intended to warehouse “criminal undocumented immigrants,” a category that conveniently broadens over time to include anyone poor, foreign, or simply inconvenient to the state. When the base cheers for this, they cheer for their own subjugation. They’ve been sold a lie that punishing the vulnerable will somehow restore their lost economic security. It won’t. Deporting immigrants won’t lower your grocery bill or get you healthcare. But it will help billionaires redirect your rage.
The Trump administration’s war on the university system is a textbook example of fascist control over knowledge. Under the guise of fighting “wokeness,” they seek to censor what can be taught, replacing critical thinking with indoctrination. In doing so, they weaponize the state to install their own revisionist history—a false past where the powerful are always right, and the oppressed are always to blame.
But fascism doesn’t rise in a vacuum. It requires complicity. The Democratic Party, in its corruption and cowardice, has become an enabler. After rigging three consecutive primaries and abandoning candidates like Mamdani, the party has all but forfeited the ability to offer meaningful resistance. Mamdani’s decisive win—despite no institutional support—exposes this rot. When someone runs on policies that actually benefit working people, the response from both parties is the same: silence, sabotage, and suppression.
This is the fascist paradox: authoritarianism cloaked in populism, oligarchy masked as patriotism, a hollow nationalism that thrives on fear and nostalgia while the country’s wealth is siphoned upward. The billionaires who have spent the last 70 years funding think tanks, rewriting laws, and rigging elections now claim to be the real victims. And the corporate press amplifies these lies as if they’re objective truth.
Fascism in America isn’t on the horizon—it’s here. Erasing History makes clear that when the foundations of democracy are already rotting, it doesn’t take much to bring the whole structure down. The Trump movement aims to finish the job. The question is whether we allow them to, or whether we organize behind bold, humane policies that serve the many—not the wealthy few.
A good overview of tactics used by fascist movements to gain power. Best in providing historical context for modern day right-wing politics. Arguments in the last 2 chapters were harder to follow and felt less researched/structured.
honstly he gets more and more unspooled with every book
I have this theory that he is going to write in his next book that Biden is secretly in control of the world's Oxygen Supply like Blofeld, and that his plan is to throw the election on purpose, and let Trump win, because secretly Biden and Trump are working together, and Trump will pass all of the woke agenda, terrifying the world.
.............
Finally a comfortable low oxygen mask for voting
now available in 24% 28% and 35% concentrations
Mix-O-Masks are packed 12 in a carton of one concentration.
Skull Systems Incorporated Billboard America 2025
............
YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST FOLKS
Get your message across, screams the friendly neighbourhood fascist next to me, watching me writhe with ill-disguised excitement. I think I see a stain on his crotch but it might just be my eyeballs puking. In any case, the term 'bowel movement' attains symphonic intensity. I am drawn and quartered like some Kraft cheese that got left out on the moon too long.
SCRIBE JFS
...........
To imagine Donald Trump in his prime, divering himself by feeding goldfish into a stapling machine or putting firecrackers into a paraplegic's colostomy bag, made you feel that whatever gene pool this crafty cretin derived from only had a deep, dark end
SCRIBE JFS
............
The Amazing Stanley or the Amazing Chriswell?
We think of cannibalism as a thing of the past practiced only in the wildest jungles far from our civilized way of life. However even today cannibalism is practiced in our own society but acts of such savagery are kept hidden from the public. I predict an outburst of Cannibalism that will terrorize the population of one of the industrial cities in the state of Pennsylvania - Pittsburgh!
Our entire nation is dotted with experimental laboratories which are kept under constant guard and operated in complete secrecy. Little is known about these many plants and laboratories for the experiments they conduct would startle and shock the entire world. Extreme precautions must be taken for the safety of every employee but quite often there are accidents which cannot be avoided. Naturally these accidents are hushed for word of them would violate the secrecy which is so essential. However I predict one terrible accident which will become known for it will be impossible to keep it within the confines of the walled and carefully guarded laboratory. I predict that one of the largest experimental laboratories in Pennsylvania will have a sudden release of gas from a large chamber which will be swept through every sector of the installation. I predict that these fumes will enter the ventilation system carrying to every corridor of the laboratory and will effect thousands of employees. This gas will have been developed by a scientist who is working on nerve gases that affect man's mentality. This unfortunate scientist will be the victim of a fatal heart attack and his sudden collapse will permit the dangerous fumes to be released and swept through the entire laboratory. The effects of this gas will be ghastly for it will create in man a desire for raw flesh and it will be an uncontrollable hunger and lust. Men employed in the laboratory will seek to quell their appetites and the acts they commit within the confines of these walls cannot be told. I predict many of them will satisfy unspeakable urges there but others will leave the laboratory and search elsewhere to appease their maddened crazed hunger. No one outside the laboratory will know what happened behind its guarded walls and the public will receive no warning until it is too late. I predict that over one thousand flesh mad and blood crazed men will wander through the streets suddenly attacking unsuspecting victims, I predict that many of these animal like men will be captured but others will seek hiding places and elude the authorities. Countless numbers of men, women and children will be kidnapped suddenly disappearing and will never be found. The state of Pennsylvania will go all out in an effort to stop this horrible mass murder and will begin the greatest man hunt the country has ever known. I predict that hundreds of terrorists will be found and imprisoned but they will have had a chance to bring death to a great many innocent victims. Each and every day more bodies will be found. Their flesh torn from their bones in a hungry manner. Many others will be found stripped of their clothing, bound and gagged in cellars and attics meeting a most horrible and foul death. I predict that the wife of a government official fortunately will be rescued and she will tell the most horrifying tale ever to be released to the public. She will relate in detail the actions of three crazed men who abducted her and threw her into a cellar with many others, all of whom were tied and gagged and half-eaten. This poor woman will reveal that the clothing was ripped off her body and she was pushed into a corner with several male victims who were also stripped. She will tell how one by one the helpless captives were brought to the center of the cellar and while still alive they were attacked by three mad men who tore the flesh from their writhing and tormented bodies. I predict that this woman's story will be anonymously recorded and it will later be found that she is the wife of the Governor of Pennsylvania. I predict the citizenry of Pennsylvania will demand added police and military protection and a curfew will be enforced. I predict no one will be permitted to enter the streets at night and during the day everyone will be ordered to travel in pairs. However at night husbands will return home to find their wives and children missing. Clerks will disappear from shops and empty trucks will be found on road ways. People will refuse to leave their homes. Business will shut down and a state of terror will reign. Policemen will disappear from their corners and post office employees will suddenly be gone. I predict that many innocent men will be accused of cannibalism and dragged away by angry mobs and put to death. I predict that the number of missing people will be frightfully high but many will later be found unharmed. This horrible orgy will continue for several weeks until the last crazed man is found and only then will the shocked and terrorized city return to normal. Mass mournings will be held for the victims. A smile will be unknown. The fate of this city of Pittsburgh, Penn., will never be forgotten and I predict that added safety measures will be taken in all chemical laboratories to make certain there is no similar accident.
YOU BE THE JUDGE
..........
Publishers Weekly
This warns of an imminent fascist future but doesn’t delve far enough into how to stop it.
Jason Stanley is shaping up to be my favorite historian and modern day philosopher. Grand educator may be my prime term for him. I have listened to two of his books back to back and have found them to be scary, yes, with how accurately they reflect the current state of America, a country I grew up believing would never fall to fascist ideology, but also incredibly informative and important. Knowledge is going to be our weapon in the years to come. Knowing what we’re up against and how the other side wields fear and manipulation as theirs helps us get an idea of just how we need to fight back, and how we need to retain the knowledge of all that has come before. Excellent book. I know I am not the one who should be making this comment, but after these two books, Jason Stanley HAS to be invited to the cookout, right?
This is about such an important topic and I felt like I learned a lot! I’m taking a star off though due to the author calling the genocide of the Palestinian people a “war” but simultaneously acknowledges that Israel uses fascist tactics that harm (and kill) Palestinians. The author acknowledges other genocides, like the u.s genocide against the indigenous population, but not the current genocide Israel is conducting against Palestinians…
Good research and importnat read, but dear author, reading that Bronisław Malinowski was a Polish-BRITISH anthropologist hurt my Polish feelings. Calling him British because what?, he was working on University of London or something...? Like, no? And the fact it happened in chapter 7 that is about “Reclaiming History” was a BIT ironic. Anyway, fully recommended.
This was a surprisingly quicker read than I expected! I definitely have a better understanding of fascism and fascist education than before reading this, so I say that’s a win! It was more biased than I had hoped for, but I could’ve researched that more before jumping in. Overall, I enjoyed reading this one.
e-ARC provided by Atria Books and NetGalley in exchange for an honest review
ERASING HISTORY should occupy the same shelf space as books such as Ibram X. Kendi’s How to Be an Antiracist and Ijeoma Oluo’s So You Want to Talk About Race. In terms of being an introduction to how fascism works and where we can see examples of fascism in our history and current events, it’s successful. I did wish, however, that it could have committed to a more discerning definition of fascism, as well as focused more on rising fascism in the US.
Jason Stanley is a professor specializing in philosophy of education, so he has the depth and breadth to write about this subject. In ERASING HISTORY, Stanley first gives us an overview of the reasons why fascists are threatened by a democratic, pluralistic view of history: because understanding that there are multiple perspectives on history is tantamount to admitting that different perspectives, and therefore different people, are valuable, and fascism is all about controlling the narrative for the powerful to maintain their influence.
Things that made me think from reading ERASING HISTORY include:
- Settler colonialism using the erasure of indigenous history and culture to justify implanting their superior culture on an “unclaimed” land;
- “Civilization savagism” as the act of rendering the local population deserving of being colonized or ruled by the colonizing nation’s universally superior cultural norms;
- The need for “supremacist nationalism” to justify their manifest superiority by portraying themselves in only a good, pure, and innocent light, e.g. the way in which US conservatives have tried to rewrite the US’ history with slavery and the actions of the Ku Klux Klan as being beneficial to Black people;
- The five themes of fascist education being national greatness, national purity, national innocence, strict gender roles, and vilification of the left;
- The susceptibility of populations educated with myths of national supremacy to the Great Replacement Theory (or the fear that their position of influence in their society will be replaced by invading foreign stains), because their nationhood is predicated on the belief that they are superior to others.
Stanley pulls on historical examples from Nazi Germany, India, Hungary, Russia, and more to support his arguments. All of this is fascinating, but I found myself wishing he would stick more to analyzing historical and current US events, as ERASING HISTORY inadvertently gives off the impression that “Well, the US may be bad in some ways, but at least we’re not Nazi Germany!” which is not really the message that we need right now.
Indeed, one could argue that Stanley is so quick to assign the label of fascism to contemporary societies that it starts to lose its impact. In taking a broader view in his analysis, the book could end up confusing or misleading readers into thinking that fascism is less a threat to the US than it really is, because he switches from talking about non-US examples of fascism to US examples in a way that sort of obfuscates the seriousness of the rise of fascism in the US.
Finally, I wasn’t that impressed that, for someone so quick to throw out the labels of fascism and genocide (he calls what Russia is doing to Ukrainians a genocide, or at least a “cultural genocide”), Stanley delicately yet noticeably avoids labeling Israel’s actions against Palestinians as a genocide. Every time Israel is brought up as an example, the book is careful to preface it by saying that Israel acted in response to a “horrific” terrorist attack by Hamas, whereas Israel’s actions are only “arguably genocidal”. Interesting because on his social media he DOES call a genocide a genocide, but limitations were placed on this book? Shrug.
As far as literature on fascism is concerned, I’m not sure if ERASING HISTORY breaks any new ground, but it is a good summary of the concept for those who are, perhaps, just beginning to un-learn the things that we had been taught. A more specific focus on the US and more actionable measures that we can take against fascism would have made it a stronger read for me.
“…an education system is the foundation upon which a political culture is built. Authoritarians have long understood that when they wish to change the political culture, they must begin by seizing control of education…. This is why fascists attack teachers.” (P. 23)
“…in 1921…the second iteration of the Ku Klux Klan, which began in the early twentieth century, adopted “America First” as part of its official credo.” (P. 83)
“Great Replacement Theory played a central role in Nazi propaganda in Germany, and originally, perhaps the central role.” (P. 83)
“The dismantling of public education is backed by oligarchs and business elites alike, who see in democracy a threat to their power, and in the taxes required for public goods a threat to their wealth. Public schools are the foundational democratic public good.” (Pp. 121-22)
The above quotations, taken from Professor Stanley’s book, are apt examples of his forceful argument warning us of the dangers of how authoritarians – who are, after all, not in control of the United States government – seek to use control of education and history to solidify their power while diminishing the worth – and history – of those whom they consider either “lesser” peoples or, worse, as “enemies within.”
This book is a sobering read, but it could hardly be more important as the administration increasingly turns to politicizing the American military to sow chaos and enforce its brand of “order.”
This book is follow-up to his 2019 book, How Fascism Works. Since his argument here is a continuation of, and a more focused look on intentional control of “history,” I recommend that interested readers read his earlier book as well.
In his words: “One lesson the past century has taught us is that authoritarian regimes often find history profoundly threatening. At every opportunity, these regimes find ways of erasing or concealing history in order to consolidate their power. Why is this? What does history do that is so disruptive of authoritarian goals?
“Perhaps most importantly, it provides multiple perspectives on the past. Authoritarianism’s great rival, democracy, requires the recognition of a shared reality that consists of multiple perspectives. Through exposure to multiple perspectives, citizens learn to regard one another as equal contributors to a national narrative. And they learn, we learn, to accept that this narrative is open to continued collective reflection and re-imagination, constantly taking into account new ideas, new evidence, new perspectives and theoretical framings. History in a democracy is not static, not mythic, but dynamic and critical.
“Erasing history helps authoritarians because doing so allows them to misrepresent it as a single story, a single perspective…. When authoritarians attempt to erase history, they do wo through education, by purging certain narratives from the curricula taught in schools, and perhaps by forbidding their telling at home. However, [they] cannot erase peoples lived experiences, and their legacies written into the bones of generations….
“All of this is true of authoritarianism generally, but it is especially true of one specific kind of authoritarian ideology: fascism, which seeks to divide populations into “us” and “them” by appealing to ethnic, racial, or religious differences. In my previous book… I identified a set of tactics that characterize fascist politics, which include: The creation of a mythic past; The use of propaganda and anti-intellectualism to create a state of unreality; An effort to justify hierarchies of race or religion; The exploitation of feelings of resentment and victimhood; Policies that prioritize law and order over freedom; Appeals to sexual anxiety; An evocation of the myth of Sodom and Gomorrah, which holds that cities are decadent, and crime ridden, and that rural areas are the heartland of a nation; and finally, A value system that ranks groups according to their supposed capacity to work….
“The rise of contemporary fascism poses a grave threat and makes urgent the understanding of its workings. Truly understanding fascism’s success, however, requires discerning not just how it operates and seizes power but also how it achieves legitimacy. We must therefore turn the lens from fascist politics to the kind of education and culture that makes such a politics effective. This is where the topic of erasing history looms large.” (Pp. xi-xiii)
“…a fascist culture, or form of life, often has certain features that make it an ideal environment for fascist politics. These cultures will, for instance, elevate an already dominant group of people to a mythic status, exalting them as ‘the people’ who constitute the nation, while relegating others to second-class citizenship. From a fascist perspective, egalitarianism is a threat because it promises to upset this hierarchy….
“A fascist form of life also has certain requirements. Perhaps most importantly, it requires an education system that can validate the dominant group’s elevated status as a justified consequence of history rather than the fabricated result of intentional choices. It does this…by selecting doctoring the historical record, erasing perspectives and events that are unflattering to the dominant group, and replacing them with a unitary, simplified account that supports its ideological ends.” (Pp. 2-3)
“When fascists attempt to rewrite history, they sometimes claim that they are erasing only theories and interpretations of history, which they claim to be biased, rather than underlying historical events. But they know well that their interventions result in the erasure of events themselves, as well as the patterns they form.” (P. 5)
“The mass replacement of bureaucrats and government officials by those loyal to the leader is a prominent feature of fascist takeovers.” (P. 10)
“Fascist movements center education as a means of erasing concepts and histories that stand in the way of fascist goals.” (P. 11)
“The state of Florida is an example, in the United States, of what we might call educational authoritarianism, a strategy in which politicians restrict the knowledge that educators can convey, with the goal of intimidating them into spreading an anti-democratic ideology.” (P. 12)
“In many cases, the leaders of the fight targeting public education are also working to expand religious education – and to blur the lines between the two.” (P. 19)
“…an education system is the foundation upon which a political culture is built. Authoritarians have long understood that when they wish to change the political culture, they must begin by seizing control of education…. This is why fascists attack teachers.” (P. 23)
“When one group erases the history of another, the latter becomes significantly more vulnerable to domination and conquest…. When a group of people is represented as having no history, they are being denied any valid claim to the present.” (P. 25)
“Supremacist nationalism does not recognize the nation’s past sins, or at best dramatically minimizes them. In the case of the United States, this means the erasure of the perspectives of both indigenous people subjected to genocide, and Black Americans who experienced slavery and Jim Crow.” (P. 51-52)
“An especially potent strain [of supremacist nationalism is] American exceptionalism, which represents the country’s founding as innocent, and its westward expansion as justified…. A central form of American exceptionalism…is a version of supremacist nationalism based on race. But even this form is also linked to religion. According to it, America’s greatness stems both from its whiteness and its Christianity.” (P. 57-58)
“There are five major themes of fascist education: 1. National greatness 2. National purity 3. National innocence 4. Strict gender roles 5. Vilification of the left
“These themes are essentially different ways that fascist movements stoke grievances among the dominant group they serve in order to further their aims…. “Fascist social and political movements thrive off a sense of grievance.” (P. 78-79)
“With an education system that emphasizes national greatness, and subtly or explicitly some version of national purity, it is then easy to lay the basis for fascism’s most powerful political trope. Great Replacement Theory is a name for a type of conspiracy where an internal enemy tries to destroy the nation from within by importing people to “replace” the nation’s defining national group.” (P. 82)
“…in 1921…the second iteration of the Ku Klux Klan, which began in the early twentieth century, adopted “America First” as part of its official credo.” (P. 83)
“Great Replacement Theory played a central role in Nazi propaganda in Germany, and originally, perhaps the central role.” (P. 83)
“Because fascists fear a Great Replacement in which undeserving minorities infiltrate the country and then multiply until they become numerically dominant, procreation and the sanctity of motherhood are central elements in fascist ideology. The role of women is to keep up the numerical advantage of the dominant group in the face of the supposedly ‘high-fertility’ minority groups that stand to ‘outbreed’ them. Thus fascism tends to elicit panic about low fertility rates in the dominant racial group, and in turn emphasizes strict gender roles. Doing so helps fascist movements to attract the support of two key constituencies – men who feel undermined by shifting gender roles and social conservatives who seek to uphold long-standing patriarchal hierarchies.” (P. 95)
“The dismantling of public education is backed by oligarchs and business elites alike, who see in democracy a threat to their power, and in the taxes required for public goods a threat to their wealth. Public schools are the foundational democratic public good.” (Pp. 121-22)
“All education presupposes values, even substantive moral and political ones. The idea that it should not presuppose perspectives, even value-laden ones, involves a false conception of objectivity, and a tendentious and in fact ultimately incoherent distinction between facts and values. All inquiry must make presuppositions, and these presuppositions form an intertangled web of fact and value. The demand for neutral inquiry is philosophically incoherent. No wonder that such demands invariably, and hypocritically, mask political agendas.” (P. 153)
”The goal of anti-education is not only to render a population ignorant of the nation’s history and problems but to also fracture those citizens into a multitude of different groups with no possibility of mutual understanding, and hence no possibility of mass action. As a consequence, anti-education renders a populace apathetic- leaving the task of running the country to others, be they autocrats, plutocrats, or theocrats.”
This right here is the crux of this book. As a teacher this is 100% spot on and reading this finally gave a voice to why I’m frustrated and tired. This quote kinda blew my mind.
The bulk of this is well-researched and hits the nail on the head. However, I cannot stand all these cowards who couch every criticism of israel’s genocidal campaign against Palestinians with “October 7 October 7 October 7.” Almost 80 years of colonization, ethnic cleansing, countless rapes and murders, apartheid, and erasure are enough to make any people take up arms against their oppressors. I refuse to condemn October 7 over and over and over again and I am so disappointed that Stanley continues this narrative that it is some outlier catalyst event that must be mentioned when defending Palestinians right to be alive. Massive letdown on an otherwise well-thought out book