I like math, and I’ve learned in the past fifty years that I usually like math writings. There are exceptions, of course*. I’m squaring the circle here with this one. In a book group, someone recommended Michael Graziano’s The Divine Farce (and I don’t, now that I’ve read it) for reasons I don’t remember. Many commenters said that the novella, A Short Stay in Hell by Stephen Peck which is based on Borges’ Library short story, was better (it was, but then it had to be). I shelved them both TBR and then I came across this book, which looked to be an interesting analysis/hyperextension of the Library. So, I did read both the Farce, and the Short Stay, along with the Library, and then this. How Mr. Bloch wrote 200+ pages on a 8-10 page short story, I had no idea, but now I know.
There are fun musings here, backed up with equally fun maths. *And there are some that I am not fond of, topology being a big one. I never got into the subject as much as Martin Gardner in Mathematical Games columns, and I still don’t. But that does t take away from what Bloch has done here.
Infinity, infinite series, infinitesimal elements, geometry of Euclidean and non-Euclidean natures, an aficionado should find something to like here.
On notes, in his Preface, Bloch says
“As a reader, when I encounter an endnote, I’m compelled almost against my will to flip to the back of the book to learn what the endnote says.”
{The note says, “Did you look?}
I always look.
He continues,
“As I writer, I find that despite my best efforts to incorporate them into the body of the book, my work includes diverting digressions, fine points of mathematics that might interest only specialists, and citations to other works. All of these are consigned to the endnotes.”
As a reader, I value those almost as much as the text.
I liked this, but perversely, I found the most value in the epigrams Bloch chose. And now I have even more on my TBR List.