The Neuroscience of Tarot is a book about neuroscience – how the brain processes information, how the body informs emotional responses, how ‘instinct’ or ‘intuition’ function based on lived experience, etc – with a focus on tarot reading as a kind of example. It is more about the brain than it is about tarot, but it is also full of exercises to practice with a tarot deck and a journal (and sometimes a buddy) that will appeal to tarot readers.
There is a lot that works for me about this book. I really enjoyed the author’s outlining of neurology/brain correspondences with the major arcana and his slight reworking of the Celtic Cross; it’s not a spread I use much, but I like his approach to it. I like that a lot of the journalling activities involve calling on a friend to participate; this would be a fun book for a few interested readers to get together in a book group for. I appreciate the thorough bibliography and consistent citations – something way too many books in the tarot/esoteric space lack. The diagrams are clear, and the book was totally comprehensible to me as someone without a science background (but with a tarot background).
There are clear and deliberate attempts in the book to be inclusive, which I also appreciate. For instance, Ramakrishnan acknowledges aphantasia exists while discussing the ‘mind’s eye’ and visualizing; as a total aphantasiac, this is something that is way too often overlooked in visualization-heavy texts. I have mixed feelings about the author’s discussion of intuition and menstrual cycles; I appreciate his acknowledgment that menstruation is a part of some (but not all) cisgender women’s experiences, but it’s also a part of lots of other people’s lives as well and that could’ve been made clearer.
A few things didn’t quite work for me. I question the consistent use of astrology as the author’s other example of divination (ex. “looking at cards or a birth chart...”) and wonder if it might not be the most sensible one to include; I do view astrology as divinatory, certainly, but it isn’t (to me) the most straightforward to compare with tarot. It isn’t randomized (the planets are where they are, move at the speeds they do, etc.) and, for me at least, it’s far less visual (reading an ephemeris is less about the visual representation making one feel a certain way or have particular ‘gut’ responses than tarot is – for me, reading a birth chart and reading a tarot spread have overlaps but are in some ways very different processes, and the differences feel more germane to the subject matter of this book than the similarities do). I got confused every time the author referred to turning a card face down/up as “closing” or “opening” the card – I’ve never encountered this anywhere and it’s not intuitive language to me. I do think that some parts of the book were a bit over-explained; I appreciate the aim of accessibility, but this doesn't require this level of repetition.
I would recommend this book for folks interested in the brain and how it works, and interested in exploring how at least some tarot readers’ processes of interpretation unfold over the course of a reading. I would also recommend it if you’re interested in dissecting how you yourself read – there are lots of interesting prompts here.