Money is a known fraudster who “tweaked” his data and findings to better fit his theories. Instances where he got a “positive” result from say age 14-25 but then 25-30 the data no longer presented the desired result. He would simply omit the undesired data.
Much of what he was doing was chemically castrating males (literally sterilizing in some cases or repressing the sex drive generally), I think this information should be available and should in fact be studied but it should NEVER be taken as good science.
Scary to think this man has had such a large and wide influence for people who very shallowly examined the “gloss” that Money shellacked over his work. In a slightly more charitable light it was also years before his theories were debunked and proven totally wrong, and as happens with trendy "science" he was assumed right until proven wrong. Leaving a library of references and citations that incorrectly quoted his work as correct. This is a huge problem in so many areas where the volume of correction is so vast it largely remains uncorrected
I also try not to pull peoples personal lives into thier writing or science. BUT there is pretty substantial evidence to support allegations of pedophillia and other disgusting pervy behavior
2022 Update : I more than highly recommend people to William Reiner's work in regards to cloacal exstrophy and the sexual reassignment of infants (and the failure of such endevors) in regards to the social formation of gender identity I would also direct people to Ken Zucker and Michael Bailey's academic work and non fiction books respectively, The Man Who Would Be Queen and GID (gender identity disorder)
I had heard of John Money’s work on gender and psychology in the ‘80’s, specifically with pioneering sex-reassignment surgery, but was unfamiliar with the lovemap theory. This book was an examination of several cases of patients with unusual fetishes, ranging from bizarrely harmless to violent, and the author’s model of emergent paraphilia (his word?) that comes out of childhood neglect/trauma to create a distorted “lovemap.” Some of the jargon and implications here were really dated and derogatory — I don’t think this kind of book would be written with the same approach today. The author examines the effect of rehabilitation of his patients through steroids and hormone therapy, which in some cases seem to act almost like chemical castration. It’s hard to say where to draw the line when a patient has a lust murder fetish, but I still feel that sexual psychology has come a long way since this was written. Included an index of medical terms, which was helpful.