I liked this novel. It wasn’t my favorite, but it was thoroughly enjoyable, well-written, well-structured, detailed, full of feelings, and most importantly a satisfying read. I can see a broad appeal with this novel, and I think that a lot of people will likely enjoy it more than I did. The author is clearly talented and knows how to pen a good story.
I think a big issue for me is that this novel focuses a lot on the military; I’m not saying that I specifically dislike the military, but I will say that I don’t really connect with it. Its similar to when I read a novel with a good-guy-billionaire-CEO and I am supposed to sympathize with their struggles; not impossible but the author is fighting an uphill battle. The reason I’m writing this is to identify my own bias, so if you don’t share it then you can adjust what I am saying appropriately (although I tried to be objective, and still gave it 4 stars!).
This is a rare (but it happens) case where I have some very general and vague praise for the novel, and a lot of very specific complaints, yet overall ill say it was good.
My Rating: "B"
GoodReads: 4-Stars
I liked:
-Long timeline. I like it when a romance has a long timeline and there is sufficient time for them to develop feelings for each other. It makes the emotions more believable and impactful. They didn’t interact for a lot of the timeline, but it still worked.
-The author did a great job displaying WHY they have feelings for each other. An example was how Sydney appreciated how much Regan paid attention to her and what she said and remembered things about her and her life (in contrast to the girlfriend). Also, how much effort Reagan put into the time they spent together and trying to make it as special as it could be. This is much more satisfying than “some unexplainable connection”.
-So much detail! The characters had detailed backstories and lots of history and were very fleshed out and fully actualized characters.
Nitpicks (spoilers below!):
-This is ultimately the story of two women who both have ambitions, which are incompatible, and neither will compromise. This worked well at the start, as both goals seemed reasonable, and it was a mutual decision. Very quickly however this was reframed (explicitly) as Sydney being unwilling to compromise to Reagan’s life, while there was no expectation for Reagan to compromise. This bothered me a lot because it was just taken as gospel that the military career could NOT be touched in any way, whereas Sydney should make all of the concessions, or even give up her career all together. Multiple times the very concept of Reagan compromising in ANY way was immediately brushed off by all characters as not even worth considering. By the end it was clearly being portrayed that Sydney was entirely at fault for their relationship failure, acting silly, and borderline selfish. Reagan “couldn’t possibly” compromise on her career ambitions (or even slow them down), despite already being high-ranking. She was already financially secure at the start of the novel too! It was incredibly one-sided, and….continued below….
-Their motivations were, in my opinion, not remotely equal. Sydney came from a situation of poverty and instability and had trauma surrounding those experiences. She wanted to find stability, be self sufficient, and also take care of the rest of her family (including a sick parent!). Reagan on the other hand wanted to be the most accomplished member of her all-around successful family, and that was her entire motivation. It was essentially an ego trip. I am not saying that her ambitions were not valid, but I am saying that they were not equivalent to Sydney. Reagan wanted to make General essentially for the bragging rights; not because that position would allow her to accomplish some goal, or help people, or because it was needed to get a specific position she wanted. The fact that their motivations were so unequal (in my opinion) and the novel valued them backwards really bothered me. Every time they parted ways it was just understood that Reagan couldn’t do anything different and Sydney had all of the pressure to make concessions. Reagan could have easily gotten a position where she wasn’t travelling the world and they could have been together, she would have still been able to serve in the military, she just wouldn’t have gotten that medal she wanted.
-That’s quite the rant! Oops. This aspect of the novel honestly made me want to rate it 2-stars, but I think that’s unfair. I simply had a hard time going along with the storyline/conflict given that the entire time I didn’t truly value anything Reagan was trying to accomplish, which made it hard to empathise with her position. It was frustrating.
-Sidney: her anti-military biases were honestly weak. They eventually fell apart following one very obvious and simple conversation. She never ONCE thought about the possibility of working remotely, even after doing it for years during Covid? Unrealistic. The desire to be “financially stable” made perfect sense, however her definition seemed to actually mean “be in the top position of a major company and be very rich”, and not being willing to compromise on that was……eh.
-It was clear as day why Sydney liked Reagan, but it was less clear in the other direction. I can point to a lot of specifics for the former, but not much beyond attraction for the latter.
-In some ways, I didn’t really see their connection. They had great chemistry, but every time they parted ways they drifted apart relatively quickly. Add in how they never even tried to make it work after they parted ways and it seems like they worked out DESPITE their own efforts.
Thank you to NetGalley for providing a free ARC in exchange for an honest review.