Venus in Exile: The Rejection of Beauty in Twentieth-Century Art

by Wendy Steiner

In Venus in Exile renowned cultural critic Wendy Steiner explores the twentieth century's troubled relationship with beauty. Disdained by avant-garde artists, feminists, and activists, beauty and its major symbols of art—the female subject and ornament—became modernist taboos. To this day it is hard to champion beauty in art without sounding aesthetically or politically retrograde. Steiner argues instead that the experience of beauty is a form of communication, a subject-object interchange in which finding someone or something beautiful is at the same time recognizing beauty in oneself. This idea has led artists and writers such as Marlene Dumas, Christopher Bram, and Cindy Sherman to focus on the long-ignored figure of the model, who function in art as both a subject and an object. Steiner concludes Venus in Exile on a decidedly optimistic note, demonstrating that beauty has created a new and intensely pleasurable direction for contemporary artistic practice.

Genres: Art, Nonfiction, Feminism, History, Art History, Theory

354 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1901

Reviews

[John Jr. · Rating 4 out of 5]

A fascinating and valuable book, which I won't attempt to review. The publisher's description here will tell you more than I could (unless I sat down for a thorough re-encounter with the text).

[Jeffrey Brannen · Rating 3 out of 5]

Terribly conflicted on this book. It is equal (possibly greater) part analysis of the rejection of beauty in 20th century art and glowing admiration for the project's children and grandchildren. So frequently I was struck by how wicked and dehumanizing modern authors and artists are to women and then Wendy Steiner would flip and go on for pages in gushing admiration of these artists' work.

I've owned the book for 15 years, started it twice before and only previously finished the first chapter. Now, having read Colin Gunton's "The Triune Creator" and "The One, The Three, and The Many," I was ready to tackle the subject of the dehumanized Other in 20th century art.

Gunton makes the case that when God is displaced from being the Creator, fragmentation occurs in a slew of endeavors, including culture. Truth, goodness, and beauty all vie for highest priority with no genuine mediation between them.

Steiner carries this analysis into art where beauty of the particular and agency of persons is rejected in favor of truth in the depiction of abstracted form and color. When truth is elevated above beauty, personhood and relationship with the Other is lost.

Her solution (or rather postmodern art's solution) is to put the pen or brush into the hands of the Other and then the problem can be ameliorated. Or can it? She seems to be uncertain as to the effectiveness of this.

From my reading of Gunton, without the Trinity, creating and sustaining by the plan of the Father by the Son and through the Spirit, there can be no way to genuinely mediate between the one and the many, between the universals of form and the particulars of genuine persons. What is left is the terrible emptiness of self striving for domination at the expense of others.

Steiner is reaching for a similar conclusion, but lacks the trinitarian framework to resolve the conundrum. What is left is brilliant a critique of the dehumanizing tendency of modern art.

Here is my short summary of the book: through the lens of Mary Shelly's "Frankenstein" Wendy Steiner examines 20th century art as a grand but failed experiment which resulted from a mechanized and weaponized world where the rational self must rise above beauty to achieve the sublime. In the process, ornamented woman (women accentuated by makeup, jewelry, and clothing) is rejected in favor of universal, depersonalized forms.

When the forms fail, the fallback is to fetish - the appropriation of primitive imagery- because primitives are permitted (by reason of their lack of evolution) to experience emotional excesses.

Women and domesticity are eliminated.

[Gavin · Rating 3 out of 5]

Thesis is that idea of beauty and of women were so intertwined a hundred years ago that Modernism was misogynistic - i.e. in form, as well as just some of its practitioners happening to be. Furthermore, that this, as part of a wider smashing of old things, relates to feminism finally breaking out and establishing new options for women (?) Not sure of the truth-value, but I liked this anyway.

[Alexandra Hildreth · Rating 3 out of 5]

3.5– a lot of repetition and hammering down the same point, though Steiner’s work is super well read I felt she relied too heavily on her use of Mary Shelley vs. Kant from the first two pages. Very thoughtful insight at times but at others the reference material was hand picked to support the authors point and made it feel dislocated amongst the larger text

[Lisa]

A book from college that we never ended up reading. So far I think I am reading the words but not completely following everything the author is saying. This is one of the books I force myself to read to feel smarter (but maybe it just makes me feel not as smart).