First off, a disclaimer that I did not read the third text in this edition, actually an excerpt from An Historical and Moral View of the French Revolution. I wanted to give Wollstonecraft’s two Vindications a joint rating, though, in order to avoid subtracting a star from the later, more famous text – because one may as well sooner read A Vindication of the Rights of Men! Honestly, it’s Vindication of Woman distilled to its premises, argued less tediously, and engaged with an effective distribution of topics – more quickly read and better digested. In fact, I would have said (and not lightly) that an anthologized portion of Vindication of Woman would do for the whole, since I really hate to imagine what level of redundancy Wollstonecraft might have realized in her projected second volume! This is certainly a text overshadowed by its reputation – and how many of its latter-day feminist fans even know about Rights of Men (whose non-gendered argument, it must be said, Wollstonecraft followed with Rights of Woman)? Acknowledge Wollstonecraft’s progress, by means of an Enlightened adherence to “Reason,” from equality in civil terms to moral virtue on religious grounds? Admit that Wollstonecraft’s notorious proto-feminism promotes women as “more observant daughters, more affectionate sisters, more faithful wives, more reasonable mothers”? Rather than perpetuate the ongoing feminist appropriation of Wollstonecraft encouraged by, let’s say, selective reading practices, I guess I’d suggest reading that anthology closely, and maybe looking at just one more, for an appreciation of the truly insightful, courageous, impressive thinking Wollstonecraft develops more efficiently in her earlier, shorter Vindication.