This is an interesting topic that could've been educational had it been written by a more capable author. The language of this book is long-winded and reminds me of when I had to write an essay in high school with a mandatory word count. It circumvents what it's going to say, often backtracking and repeating itself. There's jargon, which would be fine in a journal article, but this is published nonfiction for the layman and, therefore, inappropriate. This manner of writing is the sound and fury that makes people hate intellectuals.
The first one-tenth of this book could've been summarized as, "The Korean people--both on the peninsula and as immigrants in the United States--are haunted by the effects of both the Japanese and American occupations. The damaged caused by fear and subjugation was so traumatic that it can even be felt indirectly by later generations."
There's also a cheap cop-out by the author who basically says, "How does one quantify or narrate the tale of these ghosts? You can't. So I'm not going to bother try. If this seems disjointed, it's because it's impossible. Emotion is irrational, so I'm irrational."
But, couldn't you at least try? Trying to understand is the whole point. Like I said, I believe a more capable author would be able to apply the words to these difficult topics and try to find some order. Otherwise it just feels like a bad trip. This shouldn't be Pulp Fiction, folks. I mean, could you imagine submitting something like this to your professor? Yikes