What do you think?
Rate this book
Twenty-First Century Capitalism
A New York Times Notable Book
What forms will capitalism take in the twenty-first century? To answer this question, noted economist and social philosopher Robert Heilbroner looks beyond economic theory to the social and political problems of modern economic society.
In this sweeping examination of the past, present, and possible future, Heilbroner considers capitalism both as an economic system and a political order. He argues persuasively that, even in an increasingly globalized economy, government remains crucial to a healthy private sector, due to the limited ability of markets to order themselves, let alone make contributions to the common good such as tackling environmental problems or providing sufficient educational programs. Heilbroner concludes this penetrating technique by speculating on whether some more participatory forms of capitalism might emerge this century.
What forms will capitalism take in the twenty-first century? To answer this question, noted economist and social philosopher Robert Heilbroner looks beyond economic theory to the social and political problems of modern economic society.
In this sweeping examination of the past, present, and possible future, Heilbroner considers capitalism both as an economic system and a political order. He argues persuasively that, even in an increasingly globalized economy, government remains crucial to a healthy private sector, due to the limited ability of markets to order themselves, let alone make contributions to the common good such as tackling environmental problems or providing sufficient educational programs. Heilbroner concludes this penetrating technique by speculating on whether some more participatory forms of capitalism might emerge this century.
136 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1993
About the author
Robert L. Heilbroner
171 books120 followersRobert L. Heilbroner (March 24, 1919 – January 4, 2005) was an American economist and historian of economic thought. The author of some twenty books, Heilbroner was best known for The Worldly Philosophers, a survey of the lives and contributions of famous economists, notably Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes.
Written in 1953, The Worldly Philosophers has sold nearly four million copies—the second-best-selling economics text of all time. The seventh edition of the book, published in 1999, included a new final chapter entitled "The End of Worldly Philosophy?", which included both a grim view on the current state of economics as well as a hopeful vision for a "reborn worldly philosophy" that incorporated social aspects of capitalism.
Although a highly unconventional economist, who regarded himself as more of a social theorist and "worldly philosopher" (philosopher pre-occupied with "worldly" affairs, such as economic structures), and who tended to integrate the disciplines of history, economics and philosophy, Heilbroner was nevertheless recognized by his peers as a prominent economist. He was elected Vice President of the American Economic Association in 1972.
He also came up with a way of classifying economies, as either Traditional (primarily agriculturally-based, perhaps subsistence economy), Command (centrally planned economy, often involving the state), Market (capitalism), or Mixed.
He was a trustee of the Economists for Peace and Security.
Heilbroner died on January 4, 2005 in New York, NY at the age of 85.
Written in 1953, The Worldly Philosophers has sold nearly four million copies—the second-best-selling economics text of all time. The seventh edition of the book, published in 1999, included a new final chapter entitled "The End of Worldly Philosophy?", which included both a grim view on the current state of economics as well as a hopeful vision for a "reborn worldly philosophy" that incorporated social aspects of capitalism.
Although a highly unconventional economist, who regarded himself as more of a social theorist and "worldly philosopher" (philosopher pre-occupied with "worldly" affairs, such as economic structures), and who tended to integrate the disciplines of history, economics and philosophy, Heilbroner was nevertheless recognized by his peers as a prominent economist. He was elected Vice President of the American Economic Association in 1972.
He also came up with a way of classifying economies, as either Traditional (primarily agriculturally-based, perhaps subsistence economy), Command (centrally planned economy, often involving the state), Market (capitalism), or Mixed.
He was a trustee of the Economists for Peace and Security.
Heilbroner died on January 4, 2005 in New York, NY at the age of 85.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews
June 13, 2012
I picked up this book as part of the recommended reading in the first chapter of Richard W. Paul's Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. To be honest, I was skeptical that it would hold my interest long enough for me to read it in its entirety. I was pleasantly surprised. Not only did I enjoy the book immensely but I managed to read it cover to cover in less than a single day. True, the book is uncharacteristically small (a mere 118 pages) but my customary reading proficiency could easily stretch 118 poages over a couple of weeks. Most impressive of all is Robert Heilbroner's ability to clearly articulate a broad understanding of capitalism, the forces that drive it, the influence of politics on it (and vice versa), and the success and failure of the market system as the invisible hand that influences it to extrapolate some very sensible scenarios for the future.
Most notable of all for me is the the possible further insights into Heilbroner's chapter on the market system that could be gained in light of Daniel Kahneman's prospect theory I recently discovered in his book Thinking, Fast and Slow. Something I might endeavor to explore when time permits.
Finally Heilbroner's outline for a participatory economy seems to be a surprising accurate prediction of recent developments in how social media and crowd sourcing/funding have begun to appear on the economic landscape. Although it is still too early to tell these developments seem to indicate that we are starting to explore these avenues as possible alternatives to capitalism. Something he professed would not be viable in this century.
Most notable of all for me is the the possible further insights into Heilbroner's chapter on the market system that could be gained in light of Daniel Kahneman's prospect theory I recently discovered in his book Thinking, Fast and Slow. Something I might endeavor to explore when time permits.
Finally Heilbroner's outline for a participatory economy seems to be a surprising accurate prediction of recent developments in how social media and crowd sourcing/funding have begun to appear on the economic landscape. Although it is still too early to tell these developments seem to indicate that we are starting to explore these avenues as possible alternatives to capitalism. Something he professed would not be viable in this century.
February 1, 2016
قبل از این از همین نویسنده Worldly Philosophers رو خونده بودم. حدس می زدم منتظر چی باشم و از کتاب لذت بیشتری هم بردم.
May 5, 2019
A collection of lectures by Professor Heilbroner, he speaks on the topics of the economy, market system, capitalism, and the future of such subjects. His conception of the economy is strange. He views the field of economics as simply a technical study of how to effectively distribute and use scarce resources. In a certain sense, this is true. But economics includes the relationship and interaction between each individual and its resources, as well as the study of how to satisfy current and future desires--which may be unknown and must be discovered; concisely, it is a study of human action. If economics is, as Heilbroner believes, calculation, then there would be no need for innovation nor the entrepreneur. A smart enough man can simply calculate the input vs output and guarantee profit. But the entrepreneur must make discoveries which are not yet known, and therefore not yet calculable. The role of the entrepreneur is, thus, missing from Heilbroner's conception of economics.
Heilbroner does link together similar thoughts between Smith and Marx, but both were indeed wrong about the effects of the market in inequality, ignorance of the masses, and the tendency towards monopoly in the system. Inequality of income is simply one measure of human wellbeing. Access to technology, food, education, and many others are also useful. In that sense, the common man is more equal to the wealthy than ever before. The market is not to blame for the ignorance of the masses. If the common man wishes to watch sports, listen to music, or waste away his day, it is his choice to do so. The market merely supplies and satisfies his utmost wishes. The tendency towards monopoly is a fallacious idea. There are alternative uses and alternative supply for every good and service. A company with increasing market shares simply means it is doing a better job at satisfying the consumers.
On the topic of advertising, Heilbroner sees no difference between market advertising and government propaganda. But there is a world between them. Some companies do indeed propagate false advertising of their products. However, consumers quickly wise up, spread the news, and boycott current and future products. The main function of advertising, though, is to spread information about a new product. If, for example, a company creates an environmentally-friendly engine, advertisements are used to make consumers aware of such a product. Government propaganda, on the other hand, is false information promoted for nefarious reasons. First, government steals and uses public money to send these messages and second, then lies to its own citizenry: commonly to support wars, to promote race hatred, amongst other dirty deeds.
Finally, Heilbroner's understanding of capitalism seems shallow at best. Viewing capitalism mechanistically, he fails to understand capitalism is simply individuals owning property and buying and selling to each other. Trade is mutually beneficial, otherwise no trade would occur. Yet Heilbroner seems terrified of the supposed instability of such a system. He is unaware of the natural internal feedback system which continues price and production stability. As a result, he is overly optimistic about the role and efficacy of government at regulating, taxing, licensing, redistributing, and overall controlling the economic sphere. For further information, research public choice theorists such as James Buchanan and Elinor Ostrom.
If any reader wishes to continue learning economics and improve their understanding of the world, read other books by Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich von Hayek, Milton Friedman, or Henry Hazlitt.
Heilbroner does link together similar thoughts between Smith and Marx, but both were indeed wrong about the effects of the market in inequality, ignorance of the masses, and the tendency towards monopoly in the system. Inequality of income is simply one measure of human wellbeing. Access to technology, food, education, and many others are also useful. In that sense, the common man is more equal to the wealthy than ever before. The market is not to blame for the ignorance of the masses. If the common man wishes to watch sports, listen to music, or waste away his day, it is his choice to do so. The market merely supplies and satisfies his utmost wishes. The tendency towards monopoly is a fallacious idea. There are alternative uses and alternative supply for every good and service. A company with increasing market shares simply means it is doing a better job at satisfying the consumers.
On the topic of advertising, Heilbroner sees no difference between market advertising and government propaganda. But there is a world between them. Some companies do indeed propagate false advertising of their products. However, consumers quickly wise up, spread the news, and boycott current and future products. The main function of advertising, though, is to spread information about a new product. If, for example, a company creates an environmentally-friendly engine, advertisements are used to make consumers aware of such a product. Government propaganda, on the other hand, is false information promoted for nefarious reasons. First, government steals and uses public money to send these messages and second, then lies to its own citizenry: commonly to support wars, to promote race hatred, amongst other dirty deeds.
Finally, Heilbroner's understanding of capitalism seems shallow at best. Viewing capitalism mechanistically, he fails to understand capitalism is simply individuals owning property and buying and selling to each other. Trade is mutually beneficial, otherwise no trade would occur. Yet Heilbroner seems terrified of the supposed instability of such a system. He is unaware of the natural internal feedback system which continues price and production stability. As a result, he is overly optimistic about the role and efficacy of government at regulating, taxing, licensing, redistributing, and overall controlling the economic sphere. For further information, research public choice theorists such as James Buchanan and Elinor Ostrom.
If any reader wishes to continue learning economics and improve their understanding of the world, read other books by Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich von Hayek, Milton Friedman, or Henry Hazlitt.
February 16, 2012
Review
**'Spoilers' Below**
Summary
Another title for this book could be "Capitalism as we Know it: Explained!" As it stands, Heilbroner's work in "21st Century Capitalism" excels at giving you a historical foundation for capitalist knowledge, and then bringing your knowledge up to the early 1990s and modern realities. From there, it's relatively simple to extrapolate and synthesize the book's conclusions with more recent developments such as the internet revolution, the social media revolution, the recent recession and European crisis, and the Occupy Movement. This little book readily fills in for those unable to attend a term-long history course on the subject, minus inherent exploratory discussion.
I found Heilbroner fair and balanced throughout the book. Even though it is clear he is unhappy with the current reality of capitalism, he goes to great lengths to educate the reader on the positive points of capitalism in all its forms, and to consider opposing views from different philosophers and economists. Moreover his vocabulary is at just the right level of wit and density for most educated readers, though I found myself re-reading some passages a few times to really soak in what was said. Some criticism could be directed at the relatively small number of contemporary philosophical comparisons made, yet adding more comparisons would damage the necessary brevity of the text. The book is short, informative and approachable. I highly recommend it for anyone wishing to learn more about capitalism -- the dominant ideology and structure affecting our 21st century lives.
**'Spoilers' Below**
Summary
Robert Heilbroner's "21st Century Capitalism," which is a CBC Ideas series Massey Lecture in print form, will now join a few other economic books of note on my shelf. Heilbroner gives us perspective on capitalism in a fair and academic manner, by first examining the three historic forms of society: tradition, command, and the much more recent capitalism. From there, Heilbroner synthesizes the opinions of four major philosophers: Adam Smith, Karl Marx, John Maynard Keynes, and Joseph Schumpeter with his own analysis and relevant literature references in order to examine the root meanings of capitalism, capitalism versus government, and the function and structure of the market system. Having carefully elucidated the pluses and perils of Capitalism, he then goes on to come up with analytical and visionary approaches for future alternatives to government, concluding with the present need for increased government involvement and regulation, and a future hope for humanity in fully participatory societies.
Some of the surprising or important facts imparted by Heilbroner -- many of which were of the 'right in front of my face' variety -- include: the three historical forms of society, the notion of capitalism as an incredibly powerful dynamic force for change, the relative fairness and genius of Adam Smith, the notion of 'desired' levels of unemployment, the necessity for separation of business and state (compare to reality in the US/Canada), the belief by nearly all economists and philosophers that capitalism is doomed to destroy itself, and Marx's important theory of commodification and alienation (a 'lite' version which includes comparisons to Smith, for those unwilling to digest Marx en totale).
March 16, 2014
Pushing socialism. I don't think all the dots were connected.
June 22, 2026
Likely very forgettable. Heilbroner lures you in with a great premise: can we step outside of capitalism, see it through the eyes of other historical societies, and critique it from an external vantage point? Unfortunately, Heilbroner doesn’t spend much time actually fleshing this concept out, and goes through a pretty tired summarization of the flaws of modern capitalism, and cataloguing some thoughts of where it might take us (at the time in the 90s) through the 21st century. None of this was particularly original or insightful. There are many other books on both sides of the argument that you’re better off reading. This is a shame because his Worldly Philosopher book is wonderful.
June 8, 2018
I finished the whole book, so according to my rules I have to give it 2 stars, but it really isn't worth 2 stars.
A book by a socialist economist expressing his disappointment that capitalism has won the contest.
He finishes the book with his hopes that socialism can still win out in the 21st century.
Most of the book is about the predictions of his favorite economists that socialism will replace capitalism, and his disappointment that it hasn't happened.
A book by a socialist economist expressing his disappointment that capitalism has won the contest.
He finishes the book with his hopes that socialism can still win out in the 21st century.
Most of the book is about the predictions of his favorite economists that socialism will replace capitalism, and his disappointment that it hasn't happened.
December 5, 2009
This book is an older Massey Lecture, from 1992. It's often interesting reading forward-looking books from the past - my favorite has to be "The Two German States and European Security", which had the misfortune of being published in mid-1989 and claimed that a divided Germany was there to stay!
This book does not so much make bold claims about what capitalism (or, as the author puts it, "capitalisms") will look like, but rather, he looks at how we got to where we are. Heilbroner looks at a range of economic thinkers, including Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes in order to explain how capitalism took its shape and what challenges it faces. He does examine some of the problems with "pure" economic theory, which is refreshing.
There is not much in the way of prediction or forecasting in this book, but it is still a worthwhile look at the state of capitalism and economics.
This book does not so much make bold claims about what capitalism (or, as the author puts it, "capitalisms") will look like, but rather, he looks at how we got to where we are. Heilbroner looks at a range of economic thinkers, including Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes in order to explain how capitalism took its shape and what challenges it faces. He does examine some of the problems with "pure" economic theory, which is refreshing.
There is not much in the way of prediction or forecasting in this book, but it is still a worthwhile look at the state of capitalism and economics.
Read
May 30, 2021I cry X'D I had to write an essay for this book, and I have to say, it was one of the most challenging readings I have ever encountered. The sentences were structured in a way that is difficult to follow, but once I understood what he was trying to say, it was like a eureka moment for me.
I don't know how to rate it just because I'm not well-versed with the concepts in the book, but I feel like if I did have more background information about them, I would have appreciated it a lot more than I do now.
I don't know how to rate it just because I'm not well-versed with the concepts in the book, but I feel like if I did have more background information about them, I would have appreciated it a lot more than I do now.
October 22, 2012
Enlightening.
October 25, 2013
Time to write my 10-page analysis
Read
January 12, 2015Read part of it. Meaning, part of the required readings. It was boring xP
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews