Con la pubblicazione di Figure III (1972) lo studio delle strutture e delle tecniche narrative ha largamente utilizzato e sviluppato quanto Gérard Genette aveva proposto come «discorso del racconto». Dopo dieci anni di riflessioni, Genette torna con questo libro sui propri passi, fornendo una rilettura critica del suo «saggio di metodo» e il bilancio d'un lungo periodo di ricerche in campo narratologico. Premessa del libro è la convinzione che la narratologia debba «esplorare il campo dei possibili, anzi degli "impossibili" senza fermarsi eccessivamente su questo confine che non è suo compito tracciare. I critici si sono finora limitati a interpretare la letteratura: adesso si tratta di trasformarla». Lo studio di Genette - che muove dalla Recherche di Proust, come già Figure III - si incentra sui problemi di tempo, di modo, di voce, recuperando anche un tono di pamphlet settecentesco, ironico e autoironico, pieno di narratività diffusa, chiamando il lettore a misurarsi con un'opera utilmente provocatoria.
Genette was largely responsible for the reintroduction of a rhetorical vocabulary into literary criticism, for example such terms as trope and metonymy. Additionally his work on narrative, best known in English through the selection Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, has been of importance.[2] His major work is the multi-part Figures series, of which Narrative Discourse is a section. His trilogy on textual transcendence, which has also been quite influential, is composed of Introduction à l'architexte (1979), Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree (1982), and Paratexts. Thresholds of interpretation (1997).[3] His international influence is not as great as that of some others identified with structuralism, such as Roland Barthes and Claude Lévi-Strauss; his work is more often included in selections or discussed in secondary works than studied in its own right. Terms and techniques originating in his vocabulary and systems have, however, become widespread, such as the term paratext for prefaces, introductions, illustrations or other material accompanying the text, or hypotext for the sources of the text.
First, please note that it is necessary to read Genette's "Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method" before approaching "Revisted." Genette himself called this text an addendum - it simply adds some thoughts to the original text + also responds to some of the criticisms that arose following the publication of Essay in Method.
That being said, this is an engaging, helpful and often funny addition to the original work and to the study of narratology. Those who read and enjoyed Essay in Method will want to come back to Revisited to see what Genette has to add.
Woo! This is a follow-up or addendum to Narrative Discourse. It wouldn't really make sense to read this without reading the other one first. In fact, I had this book in my hands first, and then realized I needed to shop some more. This book is clearer and elucidates some of the ideas from the first book. Genette also addresses (snarkily) a variety of critics, so it's fun to see an academic talking smack. One of his prime target is Mieke Bal. I'm actually looking forward to reading her book (hopefully) in the near future.