Despite only being a 232 page long book, this was a serious test of patience, comprehension, and…. attention span. I’ll say from the gate, if you’re strictly a history buff, this isn’t going to be the book for you, as history in the materialistic sense barely makes up a quarter of the content in Cuba And It’s Neighbors: Democracy in Motion. Much of this is focused in the first 100 or so pages to give a background on the 5 democracies examined here; Bolivia, Ecuador, Venezuela, the USA, and of course, Cuba, the bulk of the book.
The majority of this focuses instead on the very “motion” that shapes Cuba’s democracy dating all the way back to Céspedes and Martí, and then later Castro. Once it gave this transitional period a good go, the rest (about half of the book) was an extremely wordy, dense, and almost overly detailed description on how the election processes work, from the “grassroots” I.e. municipalities and circumscripciones. It discusses the party’s involvement, terms, delegations, and participation in a decentralized manner, which then works its way up to the provincial level. This then is where a delegate can take on the role of full time work within the political sphere, acting as a participative member rather than a representative one. Finally, that works up to the national level, which is where you find those that deal in your Castros and whatnot. This is grossly oversimplified, because if I tried to type out every detail, it would take hours.
More importantly, the book stresses issues that still continue within this, and focuses on a theme of how true democracy IS always in motion, and never stagnant. It’s very interesting how it manages to paint a nation controlled by one party into an open dialogue of participation that is far from what anyone in the U.S. could imagine (yet they’d likely still be the ones to call Cuba a dictatorship). It explicitly pulls not only from many many works and interviews, but from the Cuban constitution itself, and its explicit goal of building democracy around true involvement, not mass accumulation of capital (that then funds two parties and tries to call it democratic; seriously, what a joke). And yet, the author rarely never inserts their own opinions or views unless it’s really warranted.
If I had any complaints, it’s just that in some spots, this is just a little too much (well, that and some of its comparisons to former USSR and eastern bloc states felt a bit dishonest, or under-researched when it made small mentions of elections there). 232 pages isn’t long, but the text on the page felt like I read two “normal” pages for every one. Add on the fact that this was SO wordy and so difficult to follow at times that I had to reread many parts to digest it. In other words, unless if you’re interested in political science to the level that I am, I would stay away from this. However, for those seeking really great information on the subject, this is a goldmine, and I say power forward!