Many of us are already well aware of the disastrous consequences of America's self-proclaimed "War on Drugs." From the massive rise in incarceration rates, primarily of non-violent offenders, to the increased police surveillance of our daily lives, to the denial of financial aid to college students caught with a joint, prohibition of illicit drugs has deeply impacted the lives of nearly every American.
However, in Legalize This, Douglas Husak applies the art of Socratic debate to this topic like a knife through butter. Instead of asking why we should DECRIMINALIZE drug use, Husak asks why we should CRIMINALIZE drug use to begin with. What harm has any individual user done to justify being punished by the state? Husak proposes that America's era drug prohibition should cease on the basis that the punishment of drug users for simply using is unjust. In order for the state to punish a citizen, there must be just cause. In the case of drug use in and of itself, there seems to be no rationale. To criminalize drinking coffee or liquor or smoking tobacco would seem absurd, so why is this not so with other drugs?
Many supporters of prohibition claim that if drugs were decriminalized, society would fall into chaos as everyone would become junkies overnight. However, there is little proof that non-users would start using for the lack of the threat of punishment. There is also little proof that prohibition has been the slightest bit effective at preventing or reducing drug use whatsoever.
What IS proven is that prohibition has had a tremendous negative impact on society of its own. Wasted tax dollars, lack of trust in law enforcement and the justice system by the citizenry, racial profiling, spiking incarceration rates, violence stemming from black market transactions, public corruption, and disastrous foreign policy strategy have all been increased by our society's demand to punish non-violent drug users just for getting high. In other words, this issue is central to a whole host of other societal ills that might be reduced or eliminated entirely if we could simply see the failure of our ways.
Husak's writing is dry and analytical, but justly so, as he critically breaks down several popular rationales for maintaining prohibition, poking holes in their paper-thin logic. For supporters and opponents of drug prohibition alike, I would strongly recommend you read this book and take a critical look at an institution which many assume will always be this way. Husak is an optimist and like myself, believes that things may change much more quickly than we expect.