It's not bad, an overview that doesn't really go very deep but tries to cover everything. So for an introduction to myths, it's probably ok.
The chapter about Slavic myth - the ones I'm most familiar with, is based on three books (or so the bibiliography shows) two of which are about Russian tales and myths and one is from 1956. It isn't quite what I hoped for. Too little about other Slavic countries than Russia, and some mentions of the errounous old mistakes - like mixing Lithuanian and Polish gods and not mentioning the controversy over Byelobog (did he even exist?) and wether there was such strong duality in Slavic myths or not.
Perhaps too scholarly for the casual reader, for those looking for tidbits of info on this or that deity, or at least some understanding of his/her/its cultural underpinnings and development, this is a must.
Here's another example of my poor memory: I remember buying this book, looking through it and starting it, but I cannot recall finishing it. Indeed, I recall being very frustrated by its lack of anthropological and sociological contextualization and had thought that that had caused me to put it down, unfinished. However, a recently discovered typescript of books finished in 1973 indicates otherwise. Apparently, I did plough through the thing, though I doubt that I read it very carefully.
The buying of this tome is the pleasanter memory. I was with Michael Miley at the Golf Mill Shopping Center on Chicago's NW side at one of the big bookstore chains. The Encyclopaedia had been remaindered and was for sale very cheaply. The color plates alone seemed worth the cost and I had just read Neumann's Origins & History of Consciousness and needed some background beyond Bullfinch to evaluate his treatment of world mythology, so I got it.
While standing in line for the purchase Michael and I argued about something obscure and erudite. He was then, as now, an earnest student of anything with soteriological significance: philosophy, religion, psychology etc. Like myself, then as now, he felt, deeply, the need to know who he (in a species as well as in an individual sense) was and what he ought do. Like myself, he had once been very lost and unhappy, but such studies had been helping. Usually our arguments were along the lines of him propounding some salvific truth and me expressing skepticism. Zn any case, it was heated snd, as stated, quite heady, It was also getting loud, which made me think of the other people in the line and there about us. Although concerned not to be disruptive, I was primarily moved by two thoughts. First, it's good for them to hear this because it's important. Second, I am most fortunate to have such a friend.
Now, as then, both propositions seem to hold true.
The Encyclopedia of Mythology is exactly that - it does what it says it is - so 5 stars. It gives so much information about so many parts of the world and the myths/religions the people believed/worshipped throughout many ancient civilizations. It can't go too deep into everything because it's trying to cover everything, so for me it has served as an excellent reference book that references many other books to explore if you want to learn more about specific myths/religious texts. I also especially love all the photos / artifacts displayed in the book.
Not a treasure like THE BOOK OF COSTUME by Millia Davenport. I used to have a copy in paperback and the binding was subpar at best. It does give a good overview of the different mythologies of the world but does not go into a lot of depth about each of them. There could have been way more illustrations in this volume and if I had known then what I do now, I never would have purchased the book in the first place. God bless and have a great day!
I was expecting a more philosophical approach to mythology and an analysis! But instead we got a description of the characters that made the religion of older times! And that’s great too~ just something I am already a little familiar with and didn’t need!