Books can be attributed to "Unknown" when the author or editor (as applicable) is not known and cannot be discovered. If at all possible, list at least one actual author or editor for a book instead of using "Unknown".
Books whose authorship is purposefully withheld should be attributed instead to Anonymous.
It's often hard to have clear mind when reading book you've heard so much about, especialy when it has so controversial place in your country's cultural history. For me poems where nice but somehow empty I felt like "what's the point of reading this?" one can't doubt some literary qualities but as a reader I am pretty much untouched by it. Still it was interesting to read this thing, since it's one of the books that many people talk about but nobody realy reads it.
„básničky jsou to hezké a muselo jim to dát, pacholkům, práci. ale podvádět se nemá.” no. pěkné. byla sranda to číst. znělo mně to jako zkomoleniny češtiny, slovenčiny a polštiny dohromady. nepamatuju si z toho zhola nic, ale bavilo mně to, když jsem si to četla nahlas.
Rukopis si dle meho vubec nezaslouzil takovou kritiku, jakou tu v hodnoceni schytava. Kdyz od nej nemate velka ocekavani, tak umi prijemne prekvapit. Milostne lyricke a lyricko-epicke pisne jsou moc hezke. Ty epicke proste splnuji svuj ucel, ktery si zadalo narodni obrozeni. Oproti jinym dilum posilujicim “narodniho ducha” mi tady to vlastenectvi neprijde tak agresivni, spise pohadkove. Za me prijemna a oddychova cetba. Na vydani s ilustracemi Miroslava Troupa se i hezky kouka.
Bez ohledu na to, zda jde o knihu pravou, nebo ne, jsou básně Rukopisu královédvorského naprosto špičkové a - přinejmenších na gymnasiích - by mělo jít o povinnou četbu. Vřele doporučuji.