Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Rom und das Schwert: Wie Krieger und Waffen die römische Geschichte prägten

Rate this book
The sword is not only in ancient Rome a product of a highly developed technology, but is it primarily seen as a metaphor for imperial power. Starting with the rise of rome, to the uprising of the peoples in north and east of the empire, which finally forced the roman empire to its knees, this book traces the history of roman weaponry. Simon James offers an new exciting perspective on roman history, by taking the perspective of the legionnaire. In a unique combination of military and social history he shows that rome's rule was based on the cruelty of his soldiers and their excellent armament.

320 pages, Hardcover

First published October 24, 2011

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Simon James

6 books3 followers
British archaeologist teaching at the university of Leicester.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
19 (27%)
4 stars
36 (51%)
3 stars
13 (18%)
2 stars
1 (1%)
1 star
1 (1%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Bonnie_blu.
1,006 reviews28 followers
June 21, 2021
James explores the development of Rome by focusing on soldiers and their weaponry, especially the gladius (the legionary sword). He expertly details how the transition from a seasonal army made up of citizens to a standing professional army both reflected social conditions and influenced them. Roman soldiers (Romans did not have a word for "military") were the "stick" that stood ready to enforce the will of autocrats and aristocrats. The "carrot" was Rome's willingness to welcome conquered peoples into the Republic and the Empire as participants in the rewards of being part of a strong, profitable state. James also examines the complex relationship between legionaries and their commanders. In addition, he shows how Rome's enemies helped shape Roman development and actually made it possible for her to dominate the Mediterranean. This is a totally fascinating work that is written in an easy-to-understand manner, and that fully engages the reader. I highly recommend it.
Profile Image for Carlos  Wang.
512 reviews179 followers
September 29, 2025
2/3都是已知的,不過這也沒辦法。
本書的主要內容是講述羅馬的戰士文化,這個文明是人類史上數一數二的武德充沛,大概只有遊牧民族出身的那些帝國可以比擬。在亞洲,只有華夏在中晚唐至五代十國,日本中世進入武士時代後,稍微可以相提並論。

羅馬以多元跟開放性著稱,在軍事方面也不例外,採取“好用就學”主義,不斷的戰爭途中,一直向周邊的鄰居學習,戰術、武器等,有著非常高的適應性。不論是同樣來自城邦的敵人,還是希臘的強敵,又或者是後期遇見的遊牧民族等,都是學習的對象。一部羅馬的軍事文化史,也是帝國的興衰史。

在經歷過漢尼拔的洗禮後,半吊子的軍官跟士兵已經無法應付未來的威脅,馬略展開了第一次革命。於是羅馬開始出現職業軍人。這是把雙面刃,它開創了帝國,卻也動搖了共和的根本。就像藩鎮既是屏障唐廷,卻也是威脅。人類社會向來對此都沒有真正的解法,即便現代社會亦然。

羅馬的第二次軍事轉變是奧古斯都,他在內戰中成為最大的「軍頭」,讓所有士兵都為其效忠,建立一個架空在偽共和軍事獨裁體制。捍衛著帝國領土的軍團士兵成為了一個特殊的階級,他們雖然未必真的有什麼共同的認同,但至少是以自己所屬的軍團為榮,並且有別於一般市民,有著特殊的身分跟地位。

三世紀以後的軍團地方屬性特徵日趨明顯,來自伊里利亞的皇帝們最後一次拯救了帝國,之後就逐步走向分裂。這之中有部分原因,來自於軍團的「野蠻化」。儘管作者並不認為戰力會因此下降,但離心力卻是明顯的。一支高盧的軍團通常是不願意去捍衛敘利亞的邊界。那麼,當軍團對於保護整個帝國都興趣缺缺的時候,又怎麼能期待它的長治久安呢?
Profile Image for Hilmi Isa.
378 reviews30 followers
April 28, 2021
Rome and the Sword hasil karya Simon James merupakan sebuah buku kajian mengenai kuasa tentera Empayar Tom yang saya boleh kategorikan sebagai 'advanced'. Saya tidak mencadangkan buku ini kepada mereka yang tidak memiliki pengetahuan asas yang baik mengenai Rom. Walaupun masih lagi boleh dibaca secara terus,namun,saya berpandangan adalah lebih baik seseorang pembaca itu memiliki pengetahuan asas mengenai Rom terlebih dahulu untuk kefahaman yang lebih baik.

Buku ini mempersembahkan idea atau perbincangan yang bersifat provokasi atau mencabar pemahaman kita selama ini terutamanya sumbangan 'milites' atau individu askar Rom. Dengan berbekalkan senjata utama mereka,iaitu pedang,askar Rom meluaskan Empayar Rom dan impak yang mereka bawa dari segi politik,sosial,ekonomi dan ketenteraan empayar tersebut.
Profile Image for Darren.
26 reviews1 follower
January 21, 2023
A good history of the Roman empire anchored in archeological information about the swords used. Some interesting arguments made about military verses diplomacy in the history of Rome but some of the details given didn't always seem relevant to his argument.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews