The exegesis of the Ten Commandments by Puritan Thomas Watson is excellent, but this book also contains two other topics: The Law and Sin and The Way of Salvation.
The Way of Salvation includes a section on Baptism. Watson believes in paedobaptism and makes his case that it is the valid mode of baptism. On page 218 he defines baptism as "a sacrament, wherein the washing or sprinkling with water, in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, doth signify and seal our ingrafting into Christ, and partaking of the benefits of the covenant of grace, and our engagement to be the Lord's." On that same page, he argues that "[t]he party baptized has (1) An entrance into the visible body of the church. (2) He has a right sealed to the ordinances, which is a privilege full of glory. Rom. ix 4. (3) The child baptized is under a more special providential care of Christ, who appoints the tutelage of angels to be the infant's life-guard."
I'm not going to go into a long discourse on credobaptism, but baptism is more than just an "engagement to the be the Lord's". It does not provide "providential care" to babies in the form of an angelic "life-guard". Romans 6:4 states: "Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life." Infants and young children do not believe on Jesus Christ and they do not walk in the newness of life after baptism. Therefore, they are not appropriate candidates for Christian baptism.
Because Watson's view of baptism is not scriptural and he has made a strong apology for it in this book, I cannot recommend 'The Ten Commandments' without caveat; therefore, my rating is 1-star.
**"A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump," (Gal. 5:9)**