The Orange Blossom Special begins in 1958 when Tessie Lockhart, who has relied on alcohol to cope with her husband's early death from a heart attack, decides to move to Gainesville, Florida and start a new life with her teenage daughter Dinah. In their new surroundings, the two meet what are supposed to be eccentric and colorful characters, but are really not much off center of normal. The novel spans several decades, from 1958 to 1986, but there is no plot, and the story line is all over the place and jumps from character to character and year to year (the reader is plucked from 1958 and dropped in to 1962, flung into 1966, then slammed in to 1986-skipping the 1970s entirely-for a brief rounding up of the characters' lives) which makes describing what little story there is, rather difficult.
Having grown up in Florida, I was looking forward to reading The Orange Blossom Special; and, although it started out ok, I quickly became disappointed by the lack of plot/story, which would have been all right if not for the weak characters, clunky and bad dialogue, poor writing and execution.
The Orange Blossom Special, a train that used to run from New York to Miami, and the name of a Saloon in the book, has little to do with the novel, and only comes in late in the book and has little to do with anything, making it an odd choice for a title.
By choosing the 1960s as the main time setting of the novel, the author had an opportunity to explore an interesting time when America was entering a new and exciting age; but even with this the author fails to do anything with it. There’s a scene that touches on the civil rights movement, but during the entire incident, the main characters are huddled in fear in a nearby beauty salon and miss out on the entire thing. The author goes a little bit more into the Vietnam War, but barely, when one of the characters is injured and returns home with severe hearing loss; and another minor character is killed in action. The parts about Vietnam seem added in only because the author kind of had to because of the time period she chose for her story, and adds nothing new or anything that hasn’t been done better somewhere else. It, like most of the elements of the story, get lost in the jumbled mess of this book.
Most of the characters in the book are unlikable and so thin they are closer to an onion skin than a fully formed person, which made it extremely difficult for me to sympathize with them or want to spend any time with them. The few who are likable, Eddie Fingers, Jesus and Sonia for example, are barely in the novel long enough to register, and Reggie appears and is developed too late in the book for the reader to grow as attached to him as they should. All of the characters seem to only exist for the scenes and have no life outside of the scenes they are in. The author’s attempts to flesh out characters, for instance, giving one of the women a crush on a young woman who works at a beauty parlor, the author never follows through. In this case, the relationship and the straight laced and proper character’s attraction to women, is never explored beyond a brief swim in a pool and once this aspect is played out early on in the book, the young woman, Sonia, is never mentioned again until the end. The characters don’t change, and even though the author attempts to make it seem as if they grow over the course of the novel, they remain the same people at the beginning of the novel as they are at the end, older, yes, but no wiser.
The author credits seven people with helping her editing the book, but a lack of editing is one of the major flaws of the book. On page 62, for example, a character refers to Gainesville as being in central Florida, however, Gainesville is in the northern part of Florida, not central, and no one that I know of considers it to be so, which also means the book was poorly researched. On page 93 the author writes, “When Ella, Charlie, and Dinah walked into the Kamfer funeral parlor…” neglecting to mention the fourth character, Crystal, who we have been told is also going to the funeral with them, and who just magically appears a few paragraphs later because she was not included in the opening line of the scene. A poor job was done by the author and editors of keeping track of the internal references and time frame of the novel. Early in Tessie’s relationship with Barone, her employers, the Bechs-Senior and Junior-mention that Barone is a ladies man and has had many extra marital affairs, but has nothing on the promiscuity of his wife. However, we learn later in the novel that Barone’s wife, is an invalid, incapable of having sex with Barone or anyone else, which leads to him seeking love and sexual gratification with other women. This is an obvious attempt to make Barone and Tessie more likable, although, for me it didn’t work, but they forgot to remove the earlier reference to Barone’s wife being promiscuous. The instance of this that made me want to close the book for good occurs on page 252, when Tessie and Barone go to Palm Beach for the weekend “to celebrate their tenth anniversary.” This occurs in the beginning of Part 3, which takes place in 1966, so it would be impossible for them to be celebrating a tenth anniversary because they only met in 1958. It is a major mistake and took me completely out of the book.
A sentence that really bothered me was, “The air was close and sticky, as if it hadn’t been changed in days.” It seems that the author is trying to make an allusion to sheets or clothes, but it is such an odd reference and not one that makes sense. Another sentence that bothered me was on page 263 when Dinah calls her mother to see if she wants to have dinner that night. Tessie says yes, and Dinah responds with, “I’m available.” Why would she ask her mother to have dinner that night if she wasn’t available? It makes no sense.
The author not only skips across the years without an explanation as to what happens in between, but she often skips important parts of a scene or brushes over them. For example, after Dinah faints when she thinks she sees the dead body of her friend move, Charlie, “…whispered something in her ear. She said something back to him.” This, to me, just seems like lazy writing to fill in gaps because the author couldn’t think of what to have the characters say to each other.
Characters often act in ways that are contrary to how they have been presented. For instance, when Tessie discovers that she is pregnant, she insists on raising the child on her own, even though she has not been given any indication by the father that he does not want to take care of the child, and is an odd move for someone who has been clinging to her daughter and to the memory of her husband for several decades. She has been presented has needy, and ineffectual on her own, yet somehow, out of the blue, she’s ready to raise a child on her own?
The train named The Orange Blossom Special, was apparently something to see, a sleek and fancy transport, a ride not to miss; but this Orange Blossom Special, isn’t special at all and is a ride to nowhere worthy only of being passed over for the next and better ride.