Ellul’s The Betrayal of the West creates a healthy counterbalance to the often unimaginative, overly critical assessments of Western civilization. He aptly reminds us that although the West has frequently failed to live up to its standards of progress, democracy, liberty, and human dignity, it remains the benchmark by which those ideals are measured around the globe. This tension is not a contradiction to be dismissed but a paradox to be understood.
Ellul doesn’t excuse Western failures; rather, he calls attention to the West’s unique self-critical tradition, one that allows for internal reflection, reform, and even revolution. Where some see hypocrisy, Ellul sees a civilization grappling earnestly, however clumsily, with its own ideals. He is particularly insightful in resisting the fashionable nihilism of cultural self-flagellation, insisting that abandoning the Western project out of guilt or fatigue does little to help those who still long for its promises of freedom and justice.
His critique of intellectuals who adopt an unthinking anti-Westernism is particularly sharp. He challenges the shallowness of those who embrace cultural relativism only when it indicts the West, while failing to hold other regimes and traditions to the same moral scrutiny. For Ellul, betrayal does not come from Western crimes alone—but from the abandonment of the West’s moral vocation by its own elites.
The Betrayal of the West is not a triumphalist defense, but a plea to recover the West’s foundational principles—not as static monuments, but as living responsibilities. It is a reminder that critique must not lead to cynicism, and that genuine progress lies not in rejecting the past, but in holding it accountable, reimagined through faith, conscience, and hope.