My reading-for-pleasure is almost entirely British mysteries, and "scholarly" ones at that. Meaning mostly pompous ones, containing words that you have to look up ...
well, no you really don't have to look them up. You never loose track of the story if you don't look them up. They just let you pretend that you're the kind of person who really knows what "jejune" means without having to look it up.
Anyhow, Michael Innes is a good example of my preferred authors. I can only take two or three of his novels in a row without losing my lunch over his reactionary attitudes towards "lower class" individuals. This book is a very nice little mystery with no overt violence and lots of fun puzzlement about motives and opportunities. Innes's rather disgusting bigotry about the character of Appleby's (lower-class, ignorant, and mumbling) gardener Hobbins is somewhat suppressed, as compared to other books, and that's nice.
However, other bits are harder to forgive. Consider, for example, a pun he makes on the Brit tradition of referring to delapidated old country mansions as "piles." On p. 70 we find Appleby speaking with a policeman about finding a criminal in a huge mansion. Here is the dialogue:
"What might be called rather a daunting pile -- wouldn't you say, Sir John?"
"Certainly a very considerable woodpile in which to be hunting for a n****r, Mr. Ringwood."
This book was published in 1986. I feel a bit grimy after reading Mr. Innes's clever books. I only buy them used.