Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts” as Want to Read:
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts

3.85  ·  Rating details ·  283 Ratings  ·  21 Reviews
This highly original work presents laboratory science in a deliberately skeptical way: as an anthropological approach to the culture of the scientist. Drawing on recent work in literary criticism, the authors study how the social world of the laboratory produces papers and other "texts,"' and how the scientific vision of reality becomes that set of statements considered, f ...more
Paperback, 296 pages
Published September 21st 1986 by Princeton University Press (first published June 1st 1979)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Laboratory Life, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Laboratory Life

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
Rating details
Sort: Default
|
Filter
Joy
May 21, 2013 rated it it was ok
Laboratory Life is a profoundly annoying book. It gained its status as a classic for being one of the first books to flesh out what an anthropology of science might look like, in which social scientists would follow scientists around their labs to learn about the social construction of facts. Well and good. The problem comes from the authors' obnoxious tone, use of woefully outdated forms of anthropology, and gleeful fact-bashing. Woolgar and Latour expect to be annoying, but not for the reasons ...more
Jasmine
Sep 15, 2008 rated it really liked it
Shelves: french
This book is not a fast read. It should be, there is in fact no reason it couldn't be more interesting. I say this first because I have read several books on similar subjects that were and second because when I could force myself to stay awake and read it the content was interesting once you could get through the dull writing style. Also I've skimmed some of the author's other work and it is far more interesting.

I was assigned 3 chapters of this book for a class but I instead read the entire bo
...more
Michael Burnam-Fink
Mar 24, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shelves: academic, 2012, sts
Latour manages a book that is both highly theoretical and intensely detailed. Written at one of the high points of the post-modern turn in STS, and deeply involved in the Strong Programme to explain successful and unsuccessful science in the same way, Laboratory Life shows how abstruse theory and ethnography can mutually support each other. Latour spent 21 months as a participant-observer in a neuro-endocrinology lab, and from his time develops a comprehensive picture of the scientific process a ...more
Eric
Apr 25, 2009 rated it it was amazing
If you have ever wondered what scientists really do, this book is for you. An anthropologist goes to the Salk institute and reports on the tribal behaviors he observers.
Robert Campbell
May 29, 2011 rated it really liked it
Shelves: reviewed
The essential first text for anyone interested in qualitative studies of science and technology.
Mark Bowles
Aug 30, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
A. Synopsis: This book is based on Latour’s work as a participant-observer at the Salk Institute from 1975 to 1977. He examines the constitution of a particular fact--TRF (Thyrotropin Releasing Factor). This is an object with a well defined molecular structure which can be purchased and used in research programs that are unrelated to those that gave TRF its existence. The fact became an artifact.
B. Latour and Woolgar develop 6 ‘tools’ to understand scientific activity
1. Construction: This refer
...more
M
Feb 23, 2017 rated it it was ok
WARNING! I am writing this directly after reading the book. This is a bad idea. One should cool off for a few days before writing reactions!

---

Some books are written to piss people off. Mission accomplished! Not so much because it is threatening in its iconoclasm and challenging of a sacred mythology (which, no doubt, is how all critics of this polemic masquerading as research are dismissed by those who swallow this tripe). Rather, I can stick to the pretty standard line that the argument being
...more
Lenamon
Sep 03, 2017 rated it really liked it
Shelves: waiting-on-shelf
I personally enjoyed this book - Bruno Latour definitely provided a fresh perspective by importing an anthropological outlook to the "laboratory environment". This book is based on Latour's 2 year research in one biology laboratory, so it does not necessary apply to all scientific disciplines, nor the entire discipline of science - It is a study of one "tribe" of scientists based on their practices in daily life.

Scientific research is an integral part of our society, yet there is an inevitable
...more
Anderson Ferreira Sepulveda
Como nos outros livros, Latour, à primeira impressão, tem uma forma de escrever que parece não ter muito sentido. Mas avançando um pouco mais, tudo passa a se encaixar. Para quem trabalha no meio científico, você começa a ver que as conclusões de Latour são realmente muito próximas do que é visto, mas ignoramos ou não refletimos.
Sara
May 13, 2017 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
The author's approach is fresh, quite detailed and a good portrait of the life in a scientific lab. Interesting but didn't manage to deliver the philosophical depth I was looking for.
Steven
Dec 30, 2007 rated it it was amazing
This book is nothing short of a tour de force, an eye-opening examination of the construction of facts and artifacts at the level of the day-to-day laboratory. Reading this books has crystallized my own previously amoeba-like ideas about how science exists. After reading the book, I wonder at my own employment of inscription devices, trace overlays, and modality changes, even in the simple protocols I produce for fellow scientists in the laboratory. I found especially affirming the theme of orde ...more
Rob
This is a book that's cursed to be loved by nobody: lay-readers will be confused by the scientific terminology, especially in the arcane Chapter 3, and science lovers will be put off by the relativism and irreverence Latour shows towards the laboratory. So this will be another pomo theory book only read by pomo theorists. For all that, it's a decent book, and excels in giving the reader an idea of what life is like inside a cientific laboratory. Latour's theories range from clever insights to wi ...more
Theresa Macphail
Jan 19, 2011 rated it really liked it
A classic in the STS literature, if a bit dated. Worthy of re-reading, especially if you're involved in any type of laboratory study or fieldwork in a lab. This book doesn't really take into account how the lab is itself contained within larger structures (Bourdieu's critique), but it's a nice, detailed reading of lab work.
John Jaksich
Sep 01, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Offers a sociological/anthropological perspective that discloses to the uninitiated an accurate portrayal. Although the account is 30plus years old--its discussion of Maxwell's demon anticipates the large data revolution before its time. Well recommended!
Willson
Jan 17, 2017 rated it it was amazing
This should be required reading for any Master's level science student.
Yoon Lai Yee
I read the book and did my book review on it as my assignment for a paper in my Ph.D in Science Education programme. Eye opening and interesting to read. Gain new insights!
Doru Constantin
May 08, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Very interesting read, but Latour's "naive" approach to scientific research seems a bit ineffective.
Chlorine
Nov 30, 2014 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, lieu
Intéressant mais un peu laborieux à lire.
Le chapitre sur la construction des faits m'a particulièrement intéressée.
Kelsey Jackson
It's interesting? But it's also long and confusing and boring
Caroline
rated it really liked it
Nov 14, 2012
Julia
rated it really liked it
Oct 19, 2012
Jeremy
rated it it was amazing
Sep 26, 2017
R
rated it really liked it
Jan 04, 2012
Duncan
rated it it was ok
Jul 03, 2014
Alex
rated it really liked it
Mar 04, 2008
Shirley Zhou
rated it really liked it
Nov 18, 2013
Bjørn Olav Listog
rated it liked it
Sep 07, 2011
Geoff Hunter
rated it really liked it
Aug 11, 2014
Luis Felipe
rated it liked it
May 30, 2008
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Is it helpfull to describe the routine of a laboratory? 1 5 Oct 25, 2014 07:18AM  
  • Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life
  • Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact
  • Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time: Michel Serres with Bruno Latour
  • The Golem: What You Should Know about Science
  • The Social Construction of What?
  • New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics
  • The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, with an Autobiographical Interview
  • Modest_witness@second_millennium.Femaleman_meets_oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience
  • Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
  • The Ecological Thought
  • Prince of Networks: Bruno LaTour and Metaphysics
  • Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning
  • The Three Ecologies
  • The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice
  • Desert Islands: And Other Texts, 1953--1974
  • Vita: Life in a Zone of Social Abandonment
  • The Accursed Share 2-3: The History of Eroticism and Sovereignty
  • Science and the Modern World
77743
Bruno Latour is a French sociologist of science and anthropologist and an influential theorist in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS). After teaching at the École des Mines de Paris (Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation) from 1982 to 2006, he is now Professor and vice-president for research at Sciences Po Paris (2007), where he is associated with the Centre de sociologie des organisa ...more
More about Bruno Latour...