Let me start by saying, I enjoyed very much the experiences that were shared in this book and the opportunity to see Italy again through the eyes of another was wonderful. The story was interesting and it was great getting to see what it was like to live this kind of life, moving from farm to farm, and actually being a part of the Italian culture. It has been my experience too that their hospitality is unrivaled. I loved the slower pace I experienced being there and the long leisurely meals. It was great making conversation rather than tuning one another out in favor of the television. He touched on a great many things I really loved about the area while I was reading the novel and provided some new insight into the country and the people there.
What I found fault with was the religious leanings of the author. They start out fairly demure but increase as the book goes on and I would caution people who are firmly atheistic or agnostic against choosing it unless you are remarkably tolerant of someone asserting the positives of Christianity and recommending it to his readers, at least in the sense that he felt he was less of a man before he found "Jesus the Christ" than he was afterward - the implication clearly being that he was a better human being as a God-fearing man. I didn't feel that he was pressing his religion on me, but I'll admit as an agnostic, I was a little sick of it by the time I finished, particularly his assertion that what makes Italian people good and enviable and that drives us to want to emulate their humility and hospitality is their Roman Catholic upbringing.
All this is despite the fact that so many of the people he interacts with in modern-day Tuscany are non-believers, and there is certainly a difference between those who believe in God and those who believe in both God and church and practice regularly at her temple. It also, to an agnostic, felt a bit throughout the book, and certainly at the end as a disparagement to those who choose not to be Roman Catholic or to believe in God. As an agnostic, I still consider myself spiritual, and I think there are things other than God and Roman Catholicism that can make a person non-materialistic, willing to treat other people well and care about their well-being.
Finally, while I don't disagree with some of his assertions on welfare programs, I think the belief he puts forth that the only reason people get divorced is that they can and it's easy to be over simplistic in nature, to the point of naivete. Perhaps if you married the right person, for the right reasons, this is not an issue, but plenty of people don't and forcing them to stay together because the church doesn't recognize divorce is, in my humble opinion, an abomination. His further assertion that in the 3-5 years it still takes to get a divorce in Italy, one or both people may find that it's not so fun to be with their mistress, or to be alone, or that it might be hard to share the responsibilities of parenthood across two households are not only potentially inaccurate but are horrible reasons to stay married to someone. Choosing to stay married because the alternative is that you are alone and you don't like the way that feels...umm, usually, that indicates some level of insecurity and discomfort in your own skin. That issue is something that should be dealt with, not discarded by maintaining a relationship with someone else.
It also - and this is one of my biggest issues with the Roman Catholic Church - is patriarchic. He even quotes from the bible where it says that a woman separated must be rejoined with her husband, though there is no such dictate for men, other than the lack of recognition of divorce. Nowhere is he told his only option is to return to his wife. The implications that a woman is made to be a wife and - in other parts of the Bible (I was raised Catholic, so I'm familiar with all their hypocrisies (my biggest pet peeve with the church) and double-standards), a maker of babies. As though women have nothing else in life to aspire to, and should not want more, or should at least want more only after having served out their wifely and motherly duties.
I'm always curious about these people who so espouse the teachings of the church, if they, in fact, follow all of its teachings or if they pick and choose. Most of the people I know who are religious pick and choose, so while they don't believe in divorce and they lambast same-sex couples as an abomination of God and abhor the principle and practice of abortion, they have sex before marriage and use birth control, both of which are also prohibited by the so-called "good book". In my again, humble opinion, if you are going to try to convince the world that your religion is the best bet for all mankind, that it is superior to all else and that you are a better human being for being an adherent of said-religion, then you need to adhere to all of its rules. Otherwise, what's to prevent two gay men from choosing to practice Catholicism? Maybe they do adhere to all the other rules and they have just chosen not to heed that one. What's to prevent an otherwise adherent Catholic from getting an abortion? Why are those rules so much more unbreakable than birth control and sex before marriage? It can't just be that times have changed. Times changing are what led to legalized abortions and the right to and recognition of same-sex marriages as well, so...Again, with the hypocrisy, but I digress just a bit.
I'll get down off my soapbox now. All in all, this was an excellent book, though the last chapter was a tough read due to its religious assertions, and in general, I think it could have done with a bit less of the Bible-thumping throughout. If you can get past those moments, I really do think this is a book people would enjoy that would allow them to either revisit - if they have been fortunate enough to have traveled to Italy - or to experience that culture through the eyes of both a local and a visitor to the country.