Many of the techniques described are useful, but I couldn't get over the relentless millennial-bashing the author used as a crutch every time to defend the relevance and importance of her work. The idea that self-regulation in education is only a problem for millennials because of their supposedly poor "learning preferences" is a load of garbage if you ask me. And using an unresearched opinion piece from The Chronicle as evidence that millennials are a "trophy generation" truly made me rage.
As a high school teacher, I found the content unsurprising. There were a few strategies I'll use (most of which I had already heard of or even tried, though a few, like a visual syllabus, were new). I was frustrated by the at times both dry and judgemental tone with which Nilson offers her recommendations. (Odd to feel hints of deficit thinking in a book about self regulation and learning about learning?) Part research and part list. Would have preferred in a shorter article format-- and think I would have gotten just as much out of it.
This is a serious book about what it means to teach students to become self-regulated learners. Linda Nilson provides lots of research to help teachers understand what self-regulation is and how it is the ultimate skill involved in learning. There are many references to scholarly articles and books throughout the book. If you want to explore what metacognition is and how to help students become life-long learners in a deep way, this book is an excellent start.
I read the first 72 pages of this book with a faculty learning community in the Fall of 2017. I loved this initial chapters and found them very motivating with lots of ideas. Later chapters have some repetitive ideas, and took me longer to get through.
I would highly recommend this to readers who are faculty that would like students to better self regulate themselves. Several ideas in this book I’m adapting to my math classes this year!
I thought the text started out well as a whole, but it became rather repetitive from other education texts I've read in the past. I'm not sure that it's brand new information, but it is represented well and provides plenty of examples of how to motivate students to learn for themselves instead of throwing information at them.
This book was a nice review of ways to engage college students in a course in their learning, beyond just the discipline or content knowledge. I have been looking for alternate ways to evaluate participation and better balance my expectations for their work. This provided many helpful ideas for me to consider and also practical methods for implementing them without additional burden on myself or the students. I look forward to trying them out this fall!
Heavily weighted towards STEM fields and somewhat too focused on highlighting students' deficits. I also found some of the definitions of "self-regulating behavior" to be narrow and limiting (the description in the preface of the author's own educational experience was telling). Since I work in the humanities, I found the reflective-writing exercises more interesting, but I'm not sure I learned things I didn't already know from this book.
It has some cool ideas but it was pretty hard to get through. I eventually just skimmed the chapters looking for stuff that would be useful in my future classes.
Lots of good insights and ideas. Some stuff didn't seem applicable or realistic, but that could be discipline specific. The author takes a very pessimistic view of today's college student, but it might be realistic. That might be institution-specific. Would recommend.
Very motivating book. Provides a road map for procedures that will assist in developing pride in accomplishing learning as an individual. It would be very profitable if more people understood the benefits of this method.
An interesting read but not what I was looking for to use in the Summer Reading Group. Will probably pick up again at a later date, but moving on to the next candidate for now.