I received this book for review as the result of a call for reviews.
The Storm that is Sterling
2 _ stars
Let me start with the things I either didn__t like or had a really hard time with.
First, in my opinion, a glossary belongs at the back of the book, not the front. In this case, because it was at the front, and because I was reading this book for a review, I read the glossary before reading any of this book. Its placement is particularly unfortunate because after reading the glossary, I was so struck by the similarities to Lara Adrian__s Breed series that I was never able to recover from that and read Sterling__s book without constantly comparing and seeing similarities. This undermined the whole book and to a lesser extent, also undermined Michael__s book (the first in this series). Additionally, after reading the first book, I couldn__t miss the similarities between this series and Christine Feehan__s Ghostwalker series as well.
Second, the book starts off terribly slowly for me. It__s not that there isn__t action fairly quickly; there is. It__s that the glossary and then the prologue come before the actual beginning of the story and there is no __hook__. Had I picked this book up at a bookstore and just read the first few pages to get a feel for it, the book would have gone back on the shelf. I could make a guess and say that this is because it is assumed you have read the first book in the series, but it didn__t work for me and I had not read the first book in this series.
Third, books should try to stand on their own a bit even in a series. This book would have trouble standing alone. There are a number of misleading statements made in this book that really do require you to have read the first book to properly understand. One line in particular tells the reader something very specific, but is completely wrong based on events we learn about in the first book.
Now that we have that out of the way, here__s what I liked about it.
First, I really like the concept of wind walking and I would like to see that expanded on, some discussion of how it works, something. Kudos to Ms. Jones for it, different enough from anything else I have read to pique my interest.
Second, Sterling is a pretty angsty character __ right up my alley. While I would have liked to have seen more of his __flirting with death__ attitude, I got to see glimpses of it. Rebecca is one tough cookie; she__s certainly no shrinking violet. I liked that about her. She was a good match for Sterling in that sense. She wasn__t going to back down. While she tended to be self-sacrificing, she was so realistically, no martyr complex here. I would say I liked Rebecca better than Sterling in this book.
Third, this book not only had a self-contained romance, but it furthered the plot arc of the series and even tossed in a nice twist at the end. I like it when a author can still surprise me. I also always enjoy well done dramatic irony and the ending had plenty of that. There was lots of action and romance with a good blend of both. Definitely no TSTL moments. A quick read, which is always a plus for me since I prefer to read a book in one go instead of over several days.
Bottom line, I wanted to like this book better than I did. I really do think that the glossary placement managed to ruin what could have been a way better experience for me. I also think that my inability to connect emotionally with Sterling affected my rating as well and I think that the Prologue actually held me back from connecting with him. I think I needed to see more of the man he is now first.
Additional notes on the series as a whole:
Along with the Ghostwalker and Breed similarities, Ms. Jones uses a lot of comic book similarities. She actually refers to Michael several times as Batman as a way of describing him. While I am a fan of Batman, I am less of a fan of using shorthand like that to tell me about the character. Show me who he is and I__ll get the comparison myself. She also refers to Caleb as Superman, comparing Michael and Caleb. Again, um__ unless you want me to think of Caleb as a static __good guy__ because he__s good, then I__d suggest against it.
It__s very telling, in my opinion, when the nominal __bad guy__, in this case, Adam Rain, is better fleshed out than the __good guy__ Caleb. I feel like I understand Adam better and in some ways I am driven to be more sympathetic toward him. He feels like Magneto to Caleb__s Professor Xavier and let me tell you, I am no fan of the Professor. Caleb feels like a cardboard cut-out, he__s your foil but there is no substance to him, at least not yet. This is a double-edged sword. I__m glad Adam wasn__t a cardboard cut-out villain, I just wish it hadn__t been at Caleb__s expense.