What do you think?


British History in Perspective
Medieval Scotland: The Making of an Identity
The Scots originally came from Ireland and settled in a remote part of what is now 'Scotland'. They found a land divided by geography: mountainous, a land of river valleys and separate coastal plains, and settled by 'Picts', Britons and Angles. Within a couple of centuries, it was to be invaded by the Norse. There was no such place as Scotland, only a collection of warring peoples. How, from this unpromising beginning, did there emerge a nation of Scots? It was partly the work of the kings of Scots from Malcolm Canmore to Alexander III who brought the country together under their rule; but also of the Scottish Church in a long struggle against the archbishops of York who claimed that Scotland was part of their province. Alexander III's tragic death in 1286 left the kingdom leaderless, and soon to be faced with Edward I's claims to overlordship. In this crisis, the Scots were often divided and uncertain, but in the end maintained their independence and the identity of Scotland, at the cost of a long and destructive struggle. As a result, the sense of a Scottish identity became merged with a hostility towards England, which lasted even beyond the Union of 1707. To this day, Scotland's identity remains an issue in the politics of Britain, and perhaps even of Europe. It is in the events described in this book that the roots of this identity are to be found.
- GenresHistoryNonfiction
164 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1997
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
April 7, 2022
Poorly written.
This book is the perfect example of why I don't like short History books.
There is no point in condensing your content if you end up with 2639 names and 368 dates on the same page. Your readers will just end end having no idea who or what you're talking about.
Also going back and forth in time doesn't help.
Wouldn't recommend at all.
This book is the perfect example of why I don't like short History books.
There is no point in condensing your content if you end up with 2639 names and 368 dates on the same page. Your readers will just end end having no idea who or what you're talking about.
Also going back and forth in time doesn't help.
Wouldn't recommend at all.
October 7, 2022
Overly complicated for such a short book! I found it quite hard to follow.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews



