What do you think?
Rate this book
The Religion of the Etruscans
Devotion to religion was the distinguishing characteristic of the Etruscan people, the most powerful civilization of Italy in the Archaic period. From a very early date, Etruscan religion spread its influence into Roman society, especially with the practice of divination. The Etruscan priest Spurinna, to give a well-known example, warned Caesar to beware the Ides of March. Yet despite the importance of religion in Etruscan life, there are relatively few modern comprehensive studies of Etruscan religion, and none in English. This volume seeks to fill that deficiency by bringing together essays by leading scholars that collectively provide a state-of-the-art overview of religion in ancient Etruria. The eight essays in this book cover all of the most important topics in Etruscan religion, including the Etruscan pantheon and the roles of the gods, the roles of priests and divinatory practices, votive rituals, liturgical literature, sacred spaces and temples, and burial and the afterlife. In addition to the essays, the book contains valuable supporting materials, including the first English translation of an Etruscan Brontoscopic Calendar (which guided priests in making divinations), Greek and Latin sources about Etruscan religion (in the original language and English translation), and a glossary. Nearly 150 black and white photographs and drawings illustrate surviving Etruscan artifacts and inscriptions, as well as temple floor plans and reconstructions.
239 pages, Hardcover
First published February 1, 2006
6 people are currently reading
85 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
December 18, 2025
“The Religion of the Etruscans,” edited by Nancy Thomson de Grummond and Erika Simon, has the manners of a well-run archive. It does not stage the Etruscans as a riddle to be solved by bravura conjecture. It does not offer the consolations of a lost scripture recovered through imaginative paraphrase. Instead it assumes, from the first page, that the right way to approach a culture whose voice survives largely in fragments is to treat the fragments with ceremonial seriousness – to ask first what kind of evidence each fragment is, what pressures have acted on it, and what sort of claim it can reasonably bear.
That seriousness matters because Etruscan religion has so often been described in a vocabulary of shadows. The Etruscans are the civilization of adjacencies: neighboring Rome, borrowing from Greece, murmuring through Latin, glimpsed in tombs and in the dark shine of bronze mirrors. Religion, in particular, seems at once everywhere and nowhere. Sacred practice saturates what survives – tomb paintings, sanctuary deposits, temple terracottas, divinatory objects – and yet the literature that might explain those objects in continuous prose is largely gone. The editors and contributors respond to this absence not by compensating with invention but by elevating method into a kind of ethics. The book’s governing question is not “What did the Etruscans believe?” in the modern, interior sense of belief. It is “What did they do, how did they authorize what they did, and what can we responsibly infer from the traces?”
The editors’ design is openly systematic. The eight chapters move from historiography and inscriptions through prophecy and priesthood, then outward into the organization of sacred space, the depiction of gods, the habits of ritual practice, and finally into the charged zones where Etruscan religion most vividly meets modern curiosity: lightning, demons, and the afterlife. The sequence has the effect of building a vocabulary before testing it in the world. Even when the contributors differ in emphasis, they share a methodological posture: cautious about overstatement, attentive to context, and surprisingly insistent – given how often Etruscan studies is treated as a museum of alluring uncertainties – that there are, in fact, firm things to say.
De Grummond’s opening chapter serves as an intellectual prologue, a compact history of how Etruscan religion has been studied and why the study is unusually fraught. The point is not pedantry. It is to show that our “sources” are already interpretations: Roman antiquarians, philosophers, and late antique compilers filtering Etruscan practices through their own needs, their own contempt, their own admiration. When Cicero debates divination in “De divinatione,” he is not trying to preserve Etruscan thought for posterity; he is using “Etruscan” as a category within a Roman argument about rationality and civic custom. In this light, the historian’s task becomes a kind of double reading: to take Roman testimony seriously without taking it at face value, and to recognize that even hostility can carry information, if one knows how to read for it.
Larissa Bonfante’s chapter on inscriptions supplies the book’s most bracing corrective to the notion that Etruscan religion is an interpretive free-for-all. We do not possess Etruscan epic poetry or philosophical dialogues. What we do possess are the small utterances of a culture speaking in its own language: divine names, dedications, terse formulas, titles, hints of ritual embedded in the ordinary. Bonfante treats these inscriptions without romance. Her attention is practical: where writing appears, what kinds of objects carry it, what social worlds it implies. She is particularly good on the way early writing in Etruria seems to inhabit elite and sacral contexts at once, so that the modern habit of sorting inscriptions into “religious” and “non-religious” categories can feel less like a discovery than a projection. A dedication scratched onto a vessel is not simply information; it is a gesture, and the gesture is often the point.
The pivot of the volume comes in de Grummond’s chapters on prophets and priests and on the “Etrusca disciplina,” the Roman phrase for the revealed body of knowledge said to govern Etruscan divinatory practice. These chapters are the closest the book comes to theology, but it is a theology expressed as technique. De Grummond distinguishes prophecy from divination. Prophecy belongs to foundational revelation – the traditions attached to Tages and the nymph Begoe – in which a particular figure discloses a coherent body of knowledge. Divination, by contrast, is not inspiration but interpretation: an ongoing, trained practice that reads signs according to revealed rules. The point of the distinction is to correct a common flattening. Rome liked to imagine the Etruscans as technicians of the uncanny, specialists in entrails and lightning summoned in emergencies. The book asks us to see a deeper claim beneath the technique: that the gods had already instructed the world in how they speak, and that human religious responsibility consisted in learning that language correctly.
There is a bracing claim embedded in this distinction: that for the Etruscans, religious knowledge was not an open-ended conversation with the divine but a revealed science, a corpus to be preserved and applied. One can feel why Roman observers found this both impressive and unsettling. A system that asserts completeness is, by definition, a system that asserts authority. The book is scrupulous about the limits of the evidence in this area. The “disciplina” survives largely through later Latin testimony, and Roman writers were not neutral scribes. Yet the volume is persuasive in showing that the idea of a regulated divinatory science was not simply a Roman fantasy projected backward. Archaeological and iconographic material – especially the world of mirrors and engraved gems – offers visual corroboration for themes of revelation and interpretation. One sees, in images, a culture imagining divine knowledge as something disclosed, transmitted, and institutionalized.
From there the collection refuses to remain abstract. Giovanni Colonna’s chapter on altars, shrines, and temples anchors the system in soil. If there is a single corrective this book offers to casual notions of “Etruscan temples,” it is the insistence that religious life was not exhausted by monumental architecture. Colonna treats the altar – sometimes as humble as turf – as the true point of contact between human and divine. Temples matter, but they are not the whole story. The chapter’s most humane contribution is its attention to scale: the small shrine, the open-air cult place, the modest deposit of offerings that suggests repeated, ordinary acts of devotion rather than a single civic spectacle. In this account, Etruscan religion looks less like a series of state ceremonies and more like a landscape of practices, from the conspicuous to the intimate.
Erika Simon’s chapter on gods and statues performs a delicate operation: it argues for an Etruscan pantheon that is coherent without pretending it is simply Greek mythology translated into a different alphabet. Her notion of a “harmonious” pantheon is useful precisely because it avoids caricature. The Etruscan gods, in her account, are not defined primarily by divine quarrels; they are defined by relations, cooperation, and a versatility that allows movement between cosmic regions. The underworld is not a sealed basement of the cosmos but a realm with traffic, and divine figures can cross its thresholds. Simon’s approach is at its best when it treats images as arguments. In a culture without surviving literary myth, statues, mirrors, and painted scenes do not merely illustrate religion; they constitute one of the ways religion thinks.
Jean MacIntosh Turfa’s chapter on rituals returns the reader to practice. Here the book’s material intelligence is at its most vivid. Votive deposits become archives of action. The recurrence of anatomical offerings, figurines, miniature objects, and inscribed gifts maps a world in which participation is widely distributed, even if expert interpretation remains concentrated. Turfa’s gift is to make these deposits feel like a record of ordinary religious life without reducing them to a single story. One senses both the stability of convention and the variety of need: healing, protection, gratitude, aspiration. Ritual, as the book repeatedly implies, is not primarily about expressing a personal theology; it is about doing what is required to keep relations with the divine properly ordered.
The volume’s final movement turns to thunder and lightning, demons, and the afterlife – topics that can easily be sensationalized, and that modern readers often approach through the distorting lens of later demonologies. Here, too, restraint is the strength. Lightning is treated as divine speech rather than spectacle, a sign-event governed by rules and read within a cosmic geography. Underworld figures are presented as intermediaries and enforcers of order rather than embodiments of moral evil. The afterlife emerges not as a simple binary of reward and punishment but as a continuation governed by its own structures, its own escort figures, its own needs for orientation. What might have become lurid becomes, instead, a further extension of the book’s central claim: the Etruscan universe is saturated with intention, and that intention is legible, if one has learned the grammar.
Across these topics, the book refuses to treat Etruscan religion as merely “superstitious.” It rehabilitates divination as a serious cultural project. Too often divination is described either as credulity or as picturesque theater. Here it becomes an epistemology – an account of how knowledge of the gods is possible – embedded in institutions, transmitted through expertise, and expressed across media from text to image to architecture. Even when one remains agnostic about the content of divine messages, one can recognize the intellectual ambition of the system: the claim that the world is readable, that signs are not random, and that human communities can train themselves to respond properly to what the gods disclose.
The book is also, unmistakably, built to be used. The appendices matter. The translated Greek and Latin texts gathered at the back are more than a convenience; they are an editorial argument that readers should see the evidence, not only the interpretation. The concordance of inscriptions turns Bonfante’s chapter from an essay into a navigational tool, and it quietly honors the fact that this field is cumulative, built by cross-reference as much as by revelation. A glossary steadies the reader in technical thickets. And the illustrations – mirrors, bronzes, votives, architectural plans – are not decorative. They are treated as primary material, and the book’s best pages are those in which an image is not an ornament to a claim but the pressure that forces a claim to become precise.
And yet the book’s virtues impose constraints. As with many edited handbooks, comprehensiveness is purchased at the cost of a single sustained argument that accumulates into a culminating thesis. The chapters speak to one another, but the collection stops just short of a concluding synthesis that would press the material into a sharper, riskier claim about what distinguishes Etruscan religion at the level of lived experience and historical change. The editors’ caution is understandable: the evidence is uneven, and the temptation to tidy it into an overconfident story is real. Still, there are moments when the reader wishes the book would allow itself a more explicit act of connection, drawing the threads of prophecy, sacred space, visual culture, and ritual into a final statement about what kind of religious imagination is being described.
One feels this most acutely in the tension between system and variation. The volume excels at describing the logic of the “disciplina,” at showing how thunder, entrails, birds, and boundaries could be read as a grammar of divine intention. It is somewhat less expansive about how that grammar may have shifted across centuries, or how it played differently in city-states with different histories and degrees of contact with Greece and Rome. The reader gets glimpses of local particularity – a sanctuary here, a cult practice there – but the book’s structural commitment to coherence can sometimes flatten the drama of change. A reader leaves with a strong sense of how the system worked, and a less vivid sense of how the system felt as a lived inheritance in a world of political pressure, cultural exchange, and eventual absorption.
There are, inevitably, variations in texture as well. Some chapters are richly concrete, written with an eye for objects and the drama of practice; others compress a great deal of scholarship into prose that can feel densely informational. The editors have done well to maintain accessibility without sacrificing precision, and the volume provides generous aids – illustrations, maps, translations – that help a determined reader climb. Still, the book assumes attention. It does not court the casual browser. It asks its reader to accept, at least temporarily, the virtue of the careful inventory, and to recognize that in a field this fragmentary, caution is not timidity but discipline.
The style, in other words, is committed to the virtues of the discipline it describes. There is a deliberate avoidance of the easy flourish: no melodrama about “mysterious Etruscans,” no insistence that every demon must be a psychological archetype, no claim that a bronze liver solves the puzzle of a people. That restraint is part of why the book feels trustworthy. Yet it also means the volume rarely indulges the kind of interpretive risk that can make a synthesis feel inevitable. The reader is given the elements, the relationships, the mechanisms, and then – rightly, perhaps – is asked to sit with the remaining uncertainty.
Perhaps the most telling compliment one can pay “The Religion of the Etruscans” is that it changes what the reader thinks the right questions are. Instead of asking what the Etruscans “believed,” as though belief were a private interior state that can be extracted from artifacts, the book encourages questions about how authority was structured, how signs were read, how space was made sacred, how devotion was materialized, and how continuity between life and death was maintained. It replaces the romance of the lost text with the discipline of the surviving trace. It makes the Etruscans less a corridor leading to Rome and more a civilization with its own intellectual ambition: a determination to map divine intention onto the world and to train human action to answer it.
The pleasures of the volume are therefore those of clarity and accumulation – the slow, gratifying sense of a world becoming more legible as its categories take shape. One reads, and the Etruscans become less a shadow behind Rome and more a civilization with its own grammar of the sacred, a grammar that Rome, in its own way, inherited and repurposed. For a reader willing to meet the book on its terms, that is a considerable reward. My own verdict – 83 out of 100 – reflects a work that is authoritative, deeply useful, and methodologically sober, even as it occasionally holds back from the fuller synthetic daring that its own materials, assembled so carefully, almost compel. It is, finally, a reminder that in a field built from shards, intellectual honesty can be a form of style – and that patience, when it is this well organized, can feel like a kind of narrative in its own right.
That seriousness matters because Etruscan religion has so often been described in a vocabulary of shadows. The Etruscans are the civilization of adjacencies: neighboring Rome, borrowing from Greece, murmuring through Latin, glimpsed in tombs and in the dark shine of bronze mirrors. Religion, in particular, seems at once everywhere and nowhere. Sacred practice saturates what survives – tomb paintings, sanctuary deposits, temple terracottas, divinatory objects – and yet the literature that might explain those objects in continuous prose is largely gone. The editors and contributors respond to this absence not by compensating with invention but by elevating method into a kind of ethics. The book’s governing question is not “What did the Etruscans believe?” in the modern, interior sense of belief. It is “What did they do, how did they authorize what they did, and what can we responsibly infer from the traces?”
The editors’ design is openly systematic. The eight chapters move from historiography and inscriptions through prophecy and priesthood, then outward into the organization of sacred space, the depiction of gods, the habits of ritual practice, and finally into the charged zones where Etruscan religion most vividly meets modern curiosity: lightning, demons, and the afterlife. The sequence has the effect of building a vocabulary before testing it in the world. Even when the contributors differ in emphasis, they share a methodological posture: cautious about overstatement, attentive to context, and surprisingly insistent – given how often Etruscan studies is treated as a museum of alluring uncertainties – that there are, in fact, firm things to say.
De Grummond’s opening chapter serves as an intellectual prologue, a compact history of how Etruscan religion has been studied and why the study is unusually fraught. The point is not pedantry. It is to show that our “sources” are already interpretations: Roman antiquarians, philosophers, and late antique compilers filtering Etruscan practices through their own needs, their own contempt, their own admiration. When Cicero debates divination in “De divinatione,” he is not trying to preserve Etruscan thought for posterity; he is using “Etruscan” as a category within a Roman argument about rationality and civic custom. In this light, the historian’s task becomes a kind of double reading: to take Roman testimony seriously without taking it at face value, and to recognize that even hostility can carry information, if one knows how to read for it.
Larissa Bonfante’s chapter on inscriptions supplies the book’s most bracing corrective to the notion that Etruscan religion is an interpretive free-for-all. We do not possess Etruscan epic poetry or philosophical dialogues. What we do possess are the small utterances of a culture speaking in its own language: divine names, dedications, terse formulas, titles, hints of ritual embedded in the ordinary. Bonfante treats these inscriptions without romance. Her attention is practical: where writing appears, what kinds of objects carry it, what social worlds it implies. She is particularly good on the way early writing in Etruria seems to inhabit elite and sacral contexts at once, so that the modern habit of sorting inscriptions into “religious” and “non-religious” categories can feel less like a discovery than a projection. A dedication scratched onto a vessel is not simply information; it is a gesture, and the gesture is often the point.
The pivot of the volume comes in de Grummond’s chapters on prophets and priests and on the “Etrusca disciplina,” the Roman phrase for the revealed body of knowledge said to govern Etruscan divinatory practice. These chapters are the closest the book comes to theology, but it is a theology expressed as technique. De Grummond distinguishes prophecy from divination. Prophecy belongs to foundational revelation – the traditions attached to Tages and the nymph Begoe – in which a particular figure discloses a coherent body of knowledge. Divination, by contrast, is not inspiration but interpretation: an ongoing, trained practice that reads signs according to revealed rules. The point of the distinction is to correct a common flattening. Rome liked to imagine the Etruscans as technicians of the uncanny, specialists in entrails and lightning summoned in emergencies. The book asks us to see a deeper claim beneath the technique: that the gods had already instructed the world in how they speak, and that human religious responsibility consisted in learning that language correctly.
There is a bracing claim embedded in this distinction: that for the Etruscans, religious knowledge was not an open-ended conversation with the divine but a revealed science, a corpus to be preserved and applied. One can feel why Roman observers found this both impressive and unsettling. A system that asserts completeness is, by definition, a system that asserts authority. The book is scrupulous about the limits of the evidence in this area. The “disciplina” survives largely through later Latin testimony, and Roman writers were not neutral scribes. Yet the volume is persuasive in showing that the idea of a regulated divinatory science was not simply a Roman fantasy projected backward. Archaeological and iconographic material – especially the world of mirrors and engraved gems – offers visual corroboration for themes of revelation and interpretation. One sees, in images, a culture imagining divine knowledge as something disclosed, transmitted, and institutionalized.
From there the collection refuses to remain abstract. Giovanni Colonna’s chapter on altars, shrines, and temples anchors the system in soil. If there is a single corrective this book offers to casual notions of “Etruscan temples,” it is the insistence that religious life was not exhausted by monumental architecture. Colonna treats the altar – sometimes as humble as turf – as the true point of contact between human and divine. Temples matter, but they are not the whole story. The chapter’s most humane contribution is its attention to scale: the small shrine, the open-air cult place, the modest deposit of offerings that suggests repeated, ordinary acts of devotion rather than a single civic spectacle. In this account, Etruscan religion looks less like a series of state ceremonies and more like a landscape of practices, from the conspicuous to the intimate.
Erika Simon’s chapter on gods and statues performs a delicate operation: it argues for an Etruscan pantheon that is coherent without pretending it is simply Greek mythology translated into a different alphabet. Her notion of a “harmonious” pantheon is useful precisely because it avoids caricature. The Etruscan gods, in her account, are not defined primarily by divine quarrels; they are defined by relations, cooperation, and a versatility that allows movement between cosmic regions. The underworld is not a sealed basement of the cosmos but a realm with traffic, and divine figures can cross its thresholds. Simon’s approach is at its best when it treats images as arguments. In a culture without surviving literary myth, statues, mirrors, and painted scenes do not merely illustrate religion; they constitute one of the ways religion thinks.
Jean MacIntosh Turfa’s chapter on rituals returns the reader to practice. Here the book’s material intelligence is at its most vivid. Votive deposits become archives of action. The recurrence of anatomical offerings, figurines, miniature objects, and inscribed gifts maps a world in which participation is widely distributed, even if expert interpretation remains concentrated. Turfa’s gift is to make these deposits feel like a record of ordinary religious life without reducing them to a single story. One senses both the stability of convention and the variety of need: healing, protection, gratitude, aspiration. Ritual, as the book repeatedly implies, is not primarily about expressing a personal theology; it is about doing what is required to keep relations with the divine properly ordered.
The volume’s final movement turns to thunder and lightning, demons, and the afterlife – topics that can easily be sensationalized, and that modern readers often approach through the distorting lens of later demonologies. Here, too, restraint is the strength. Lightning is treated as divine speech rather than spectacle, a sign-event governed by rules and read within a cosmic geography. Underworld figures are presented as intermediaries and enforcers of order rather than embodiments of moral evil. The afterlife emerges not as a simple binary of reward and punishment but as a continuation governed by its own structures, its own escort figures, its own needs for orientation. What might have become lurid becomes, instead, a further extension of the book’s central claim: the Etruscan universe is saturated with intention, and that intention is legible, if one has learned the grammar.
Across these topics, the book refuses to treat Etruscan religion as merely “superstitious.” It rehabilitates divination as a serious cultural project. Too often divination is described either as credulity or as picturesque theater. Here it becomes an epistemology – an account of how knowledge of the gods is possible – embedded in institutions, transmitted through expertise, and expressed across media from text to image to architecture. Even when one remains agnostic about the content of divine messages, one can recognize the intellectual ambition of the system: the claim that the world is readable, that signs are not random, and that human communities can train themselves to respond properly to what the gods disclose.
The book is also, unmistakably, built to be used. The appendices matter. The translated Greek and Latin texts gathered at the back are more than a convenience; they are an editorial argument that readers should see the evidence, not only the interpretation. The concordance of inscriptions turns Bonfante’s chapter from an essay into a navigational tool, and it quietly honors the fact that this field is cumulative, built by cross-reference as much as by revelation. A glossary steadies the reader in technical thickets. And the illustrations – mirrors, bronzes, votives, architectural plans – are not decorative. They are treated as primary material, and the book’s best pages are those in which an image is not an ornament to a claim but the pressure that forces a claim to become precise.
And yet the book’s virtues impose constraints. As with many edited handbooks, comprehensiveness is purchased at the cost of a single sustained argument that accumulates into a culminating thesis. The chapters speak to one another, but the collection stops just short of a concluding synthesis that would press the material into a sharper, riskier claim about what distinguishes Etruscan religion at the level of lived experience and historical change. The editors’ caution is understandable: the evidence is uneven, and the temptation to tidy it into an overconfident story is real. Still, there are moments when the reader wishes the book would allow itself a more explicit act of connection, drawing the threads of prophecy, sacred space, visual culture, and ritual into a final statement about what kind of religious imagination is being described.
One feels this most acutely in the tension between system and variation. The volume excels at describing the logic of the “disciplina,” at showing how thunder, entrails, birds, and boundaries could be read as a grammar of divine intention. It is somewhat less expansive about how that grammar may have shifted across centuries, or how it played differently in city-states with different histories and degrees of contact with Greece and Rome. The reader gets glimpses of local particularity – a sanctuary here, a cult practice there – but the book’s structural commitment to coherence can sometimes flatten the drama of change. A reader leaves with a strong sense of how the system worked, and a less vivid sense of how the system felt as a lived inheritance in a world of political pressure, cultural exchange, and eventual absorption.
There are, inevitably, variations in texture as well. Some chapters are richly concrete, written with an eye for objects and the drama of practice; others compress a great deal of scholarship into prose that can feel densely informational. The editors have done well to maintain accessibility without sacrificing precision, and the volume provides generous aids – illustrations, maps, translations – that help a determined reader climb. Still, the book assumes attention. It does not court the casual browser. It asks its reader to accept, at least temporarily, the virtue of the careful inventory, and to recognize that in a field this fragmentary, caution is not timidity but discipline.
The style, in other words, is committed to the virtues of the discipline it describes. There is a deliberate avoidance of the easy flourish: no melodrama about “mysterious Etruscans,” no insistence that every demon must be a psychological archetype, no claim that a bronze liver solves the puzzle of a people. That restraint is part of why the book feels trustworthy. Yet it also means the volume rarely indulges the kind of interpretive risk that can make a synthesis feel inevitable. The reader is given the elements, the relationships, the mechanisms, and then – rightly, perhaps – is asked to sit with the remaining uncertainty.
Perhaps the most telling compliment one can pay “The Religion of the Etruscans” is that it changes what the reader thinks the right questions are. Instead of asking what the Etruscans “believed,” as though belief were a private interior state that can be extracted from artifacts, the book encourages questions about how authority was structured, how signs were read, how space was made sacred, how devotion was materialized, and how continuity between life and death was maintained. It replaces the romance of the lost text with the discipline of the surviving trace. It makes the Etruscans less a corridor leading to Rome and more a civilization with its own intellectual ambition: a determination to map divine intention onto the world and to train human action to answer it.
The pleasures of the volume are therefore those of clarity and accumulation – the slow, gratifying sense of a world becoming more legible as its categories take shape. One reads, and the Etruscans become less a shadow behind Rome and more a civilization with its own grammar of the sacred, a grammar that Rome, in its own way, inherited and repurposed. For a reader willing to meet the book on its terms, that is a considerable reward. My own verdict – 83 out of 100 – reflects a work that is authoritative, deeply useful, and methodologically sober, even as it occasionally holds back from the fuller synthetic daring that its own materials, assembled so carefully, almost compel. It is, finally, a reminder that in a field built from shards, intellectual honesty can be a form of style – and that patience, when it is this well organized, can feel like a kind of narrative in its own right.
May 3, 2017
OK book
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews