Terror at Belsan by John Giduck
I'm purposely not giving it a rating because I simply can't. Explained in Review
On September 3, 2004, 30 plus terrorist invaded the traditional fair-like festivities of a traditional first-day of school celebration in Belsan, Russia, taking approximately 2100 people hostage and holding them for 62 hours torturing them physically and mentally before killing more than 300, including 186 children. John Giduck is reportedly an expert in the field of counter-terrorism, training our military, police officers around the country, and schools/employers in active shooters scenarios. He contends this book is a result of three trips to Belsan, beginning immediately after the siege and interviews with numerous government officials, government and military psychologists, and Spetsnaz commanders who were involved in this and numerous other mass-hostage sieges and battles in Russia’s recent history.
I’m part of Rotary and recently we had a police officer speak to us on what to do in an active shooter scenario. The program was scheduled prior to the San Bernardino incident, but it took place the week following. The officer referred to this book often. I vaguely recalled the incident, but with the officer’s remarks I was interested in learning more. The book is, apparently, not without controversy. Giduck alludes to the controversy in the book. I have done a cursory search and it is hard to nail down whether the criticism is personal or on substance. When a book has that sort of controversy I find it difficult to review, particularly on a subject of this complexity. To add to the difficulty is the fact that I vehemently disagree with him on some of his conclusions. Yet, at the same time, since I do read a great deal of WWII and Middle Eastern history, I can’t deny that he has a great deal of history correct. So, here goes my attempt.
First, let me say this is not a book for the faint of heart. While it is not graphic in details of what occurred to the hostages (both in Belsan and other examples) it is hard not to imagine it. Additionally, we are talking about very young, elementary students and decisions that mothers were forced to make. I had to put the book down many times. But, if you believe that nothing happens in a vacuum and that history repeats itself I would say this is an incredibly important book. It is downright scary. It is a bit dated. For instance, Giduck makes the case that terrorism is focused on the victor countries of WWII, and makes a strong case for it. Since this book was first published in 2005, he observes France is one of the few Allied countries that had not experienced a terrorist attack inside its country. That is, obviously, not the case today. But, it makes it all the more frightening and gives him credibility on some of his other predictions. Where Giduck is at his best is in presenting the history of the Russian-Chechnya conflict, the seeds of dissent sowed after WWII, and presenting a timeline of terrorist attacks since the 1970’s (making the case that Robert Kennedy assassination was the first US terrorist attack) and how they have evolved over time. Thankfully, he doesn’t simply frighten the reader to death. He does provide a list of things he thinks, based on his experience and recommendations from those who have dealt with these events far longer than Americans, we can do to protect our schools. Some of them are interesting ideas such as schools checking with local governments at least twice a year to see if anyone has submitted a Freedom of Information Act related to building designs. Others are simply unrealistic either because of our culture or because of the size of our country.