What do you think?
Rate this book
A Book of Ogres and Trolls
A Book of Ogres and Trolls
127 pages, Paperback
First published October 19, 1972
1 person is currently reading
64 people want to read
About the author
Ruth Manning-Sanders
95 books42 followersRuth Manning-Sanders, youngest daughter of an English minister, describes her childhood as “extraordinarily happy. . . with kind and understanding parents and any amount of freedom.” She read omnivorously, and she and her two sisters wrote and acted their own plays. A Shakespeare scholar at Manchester University, she later married Cornish artist George Manning-Sanders. They began married life in a horse drawn caravan, and traveled to all parts of the British Isles.
Mrs. Manning-Sanders has collected folk and fairy stories from around the world and she published more than 90 books during her lifetime.
Mrs. Manning-Sanders has collected folk and fairy stories from around the world and she published more than 90 books during her lifetime.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
December 14, 2016
Fairy tales about the world, with country sources (but no more) and nice illustrations, retold for children.
Fairy tales with ogres (mostly evil) and trolls (both good and evil) and even the only beneficent stepmother I've seen in fairy tales. The characters have to steal things back from them, or use their aid to deal with problems, or work for them and triumph.
Fairy tales with ogres (mostly evil) and trolls (both good and evil) and even the only beneficent stepmother I've seen in fairy tales. The characters have to steal things back from them, or use their aid to deal with problems, or work for them and triumph.
December 8, 2015
Terrific 'story teller' type book with old world stories that kids love to hear over and over again. Definitely one to keep on the shelf for bed time stories.
February 25, 2019
Another delightful collection of ghoulish and amusing characters and monsters. While not the best, it's one of my favorites in the series so far.
My favorite stories included "The Good Ogre", "Tritil, Litil, and the Birds", and "Jon and the Troll Wife".
My favorite stories included "The Good Ogre", "Tritil, Litil, and the Birds", and "Jon and the Troll Wife".
September 28, 2016
The stories are interesting. Like most fairy tales for children, the most common theme was a poor, but honest, boy rescues a princess, marries her, and lives happily ever after. The stories are not that entertaining, some are ridiculously absurd even for children's fairy tales. However, the redeeming quality of the book is the different portrayal of ogres and trolls. Wherever Manning-Sanders found these stories, they do not fit the typical mold.
Unfortunately, Manning-Sanders does not disclose any history about the stories. Only a very brief introduction to book allows readers to identify the ethnic origin of most of the stories. I would really like to know more about the era these stories were written.
The cinematic stereotype of ogres and trolls are barely distinguishable. They are usually gigantic, stupid, cruel, and angry. Manning-Sanders discloses that many ogres in fairy tales follow this example; but some were surprisingly clever. Most of them possessed magical power to assist them in their havoc. In rare cases, they could be just, forgiving, and even helpful.
According to Manning-Sanders, trolls were almost universally small - like Keebler elves. They too possessed magic power. Most were mischievous; but they could be convinced to do good. They were feared, respected, and even accepted by people in the stories. It is surprising how many of the stories included the beneficial assistance of both ogres and trolls for the hero to win the princess.
Overall, this book offers weak stories. These are not fables. Children are unlikely to learn anything. The "hero" wins due to the magical intervention of others. Rarely, if ever, does the hero win because of his own skills. The redeeming quality of this book is to expose "real" ogres and trolls in the literary genre.
Unfortunately, Manning-Sanders does not disclose any history about the stories. Only a very brief introduction to book allows readers to identify the ethnic origin of most of the stories. I would really like to know more about the era these stories were written.
The cinematic stereotype of ogres and trolls are barely distinguishable. They are usually gigantic, stupid, cruel, and angry. Manning-Sanders discloses that many ogres in fairy tales follow this example; but some were surprisingly clever. Most of them possessed magical power to assist them in their havoc. In rare cases, they could be just, forgiving, and even helpful.
According to Manning-Sanders, trolls were almost universally small - like Keebler elves. They too possessed magic power. Most were mischievous; but they could be convinced to do good. They were feared, respected, and even accepted by people in the stories. It is surprising how many of the stories included the beneficial assistance of both ogres and trolls for the hero to win the princess.
Overall, this book offers weak stories. These are not fables. Children are unlikely to learn anything. The "hero" wins due to the magical intervention of others. Rarely, if ever, does the hero win because of his own skills. The redeeming quality of this book is to expose "real" ogres and trolls in the literary genre.
April 24, 2023
All her books are splendid, I have no favourites really. The illustrations are perfectly suited, and I appreciate how she pulls her tales from several different cultures. I adored these as a child, and have read them to my children, and they hold up well.
(Note: I'm a writer, so I suffer when I offer fewer than five stars. But these aren't ratings of quality, they're a subjective account of how much I liked the book: 5* = an unalloyed pleasure from start to finish, 4* = really enjoyed it, 3* = readable but not thrilling, 2* = disappointing, and 1* = hated it.)
(Note: I'm a writer, so I suffer when I offer fewer than five stars. But these aren't ratings of quality, they're a subjective account of how much I liked the book: 5* = an unalloyed pleasure from start to finish, 4* = really enjoyed it, 3* = readable but not thrilling, 2* = disappointing, and 1* = hated it.)
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews