It's quite hard to take the authors seriously and have any respect for their beliefs, when they have to start by claiming not to be homophobic, hateful, or judgemental and then proceed to make ridiculously generalised and biased statements like "very few homosexual relationships are in fact monogamous" and "it is truly a lazy sexual preference to engage in intimacy with someone just like yourself". I was hoping to find a book that could explain to me how the bible opposes homosexuality, but what I have instead unfortunately read is a pile of subjective and basic arguments, written from the biased viewpoint of heterosexual men. It is easy to say homosexuality is unnatural when you are yourself heterosexual, of course that would seem unnatural to you. But it is clear these men have never properly spoken to or listened to any loving gay couples. Sadly, this book teaches very little to current Christian followers, and instead puts off many people from joining the church who already do not feel they belong. Homosexuality is not a 'lifestyle' or a 'choice', and comparing them to a gang of men desperate to break down Lot's door to rape his visitors is nonsensical. Frequently the authors refer to homosexuality as a 'Kink', 'whim' or 'preference'. As if a gay person could choose to stop being attracted to the same sex. Or perhaps the authors would prefer all homosexuals to magic themselves to being assexual instead. Of course the authors have an argument for this too, a person may be predisposed to murder but they should still fight against those urges, as though killing other innocent humans can be compared to the acts of two loving and consentual adults. I wonder if the authors themselves have ever tried to abstain for a lifetime from something that is natural and true to them, to fully understand the pain and suffering they expect homosexuals to go through. Likening this to paedophiles having to abstain from hurting children is a ridiculous comparison, and the authors again let themselves down by belittling these difficulties. The authors express their sadness that old age morals around homosexuality, where the death penalty was seen as just, no longer remain the same. Homosexuality is not sexual experimentation or based on lust, as the authors frequently suggest. People don't choose to be gay anymore than people choose to be heterosexual, and I would respect these authors a lot more if they showed a basic understanding for how sexuality works, instead of presuming their own privileged position on the matter. The authors compare lesbianism to necrophilia and peadophilia, as two types of sexual activity barely mentioned in the bible but which are morally unacceptable. But this calls into question again the authors own biases in assuming lesbianism is not morally acceptable. It is true many things aren't mentioned in the bible that we would now not deam moral, but so too are many things not mentioned in the bible which are moral. It illustrates the subjective side the authors take before even studying this issue. The differences between many of the behaviours the authors choose to compare homosexuality too (incest of adopted children as an example), is that these behaviours are immoral because they hurt others and are not consentual. Another poorly constructed argument seems to suggests that AIDs is a punishment for immoral homosexual activity, which has now affected all society, including those innocent heterosexuals. Yet I didn't read anything in this book about why many heterosexual women contract the virus responsibile for ovarian cancer from their heterosexual male partners? This type of biased and judgemental cherry picking of evidence is littered throughout and by the end I found the book laughable. Which is a shame as I'd really hoped for some actual insights and to gain a different perspective. Later the authors suggest there are higher rates of suicide amongst lgbt people because of the lifestyle itself, rather than the doing of the church and society, yet completely ignore the evidence showing that when lgbt people are surrounded in an accepting and loving community, many are relieved of their mental health difficulties. The great irony of this book is the authors claim that anyone pro lgbt in the church has basically twisted God's truth, and yet their own interpretation of God's truth is highly subjective and self serving. It is quite a stretch to say homosexuality goes against the ten commandments because in being homosexual one isn't 'loving God' for example. The authors have choosen to read the bible factually, with no room for human interpretation on the matter of homosexuality. This is a fair stance, but one which means they must take the entire bible in this same fashion, and I'm willing to bet there's an awful lot these authors choose to ignore as irrelevant to their lives, not meant for them, or not meant to be taken literally. Christianity was never a written religion, it was only very recently that the scriptures were written down and the bible was formed to be shared widely. It was taught through word of mouth and faith based. It has always been the case in Christianty that God guides our reading and understanding of these words, we were meant to re read the bible and gain new meanings. So to re read and re understand the bible is exactly what we should be doing. Something the authors of course condemn, ironically going against God's will. I would have appreciated a more objective study here, and one that was less combative and more compassionate. One question i have left for these authors, why on earth do you think an all knowing God would have chosen for you to be attracted to opposite sex partners, but to have made that an impossibility for others? I will reiterate again, people do not choose to be attracted to who they are attracted to. As soon as these homophobic preachers realise that sexuality is not preference or choice, and stop hiding behind their very selective interpretations of the bible, then very little will change for the Church sadly.