This was one of the PNW books recommended in reddit AskHistorians. This book seems a bit old and therefore possibly out of date, and trusting random people on the internet isn't always the best idea, but what do I know this subreddit is supposedly heavily moderated to allow actual historians to answer.
The pictures and diagrams in this book are great, and worth perusing just for that. The rest of the book while providing some insight on pre-industrial life that I had never thought of before was disappointing. The most egregious is its mention that many people who reached adulthood did not live past their 30s; this is a common misconception caused by infant mortality dragging down average age: if you survive that you are fairly likely to live until old age. The structure of the book while chaptered by specific topics often within each chapter failed to give an overall picture of what the housing or warfare or what not of different regions were. Instead, it is usually a chronological account with various anecdotes that feel jumbled and incomplete. I understand that history is limited by what information we have left, but for example for a book that fevotes so many pages to show the regional separation of trade or art or what not of different groups I want to be able to make the distinction of which belongs to whcih. The book is also too focused on namedropping academic findings, when mentioning who and who would be better left in the endnotes.
Pay attention the subtitle of the book: it is much more on the archaeology side of things than a history book. Which is not what I was looking for but is not the book's fault.