Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Mayhew's London Underworld

Rate this book

427 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1987

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

Peter Quennell

148 books10 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (6%)
4 stars
10 (66%)
3 stars
3 (20%)
2 stars
1 (6%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Margaret.
Author 20 books105 followers
March 9, 2022
This book was originally published in 1862 as the fourth volume of Henry Mayhew's ground-breaking sociological work "London Labour and the London Poor". The edition I read was edited by Peter Quennell and published in 1983 by Bracken Books.

Henry Mayhew was an interesting man. Genuinely interested in the lives of the people he was surveying and deeply compassionate, something that comes across, even through the somewhat turgid mid-Victorian prose.

For me, the major highlight of the book was the interviews with prostitutes, thieves and other outcasts of Victorian society. 160 years later their individual voices ring out clearly making the book an absolutely fascinating read.

This book, picked up at a second hand book shop, is now part of my reference library.

Highly recommended.
Profile Image for Sally.
1,477 reviews55 followers
January 26, 2008
Well-edited version of Mayhew's fascinating first-person investigation and account of the poor and illegal in Victorian London.
554 reviews4 followers
May 2, 2020
Wonderful edition of this classic, even if, at times, the thoroughness of the details can be a bit exhausting.
But the panorama it gives, the picture of the place and its underclass is simply great. At times, Mayhew draws short portraits of a person - through an interview - which gives life to all his numbers and statistics. Such a portrait (of a prostitute, and of a thief) were the obvious inspirations behind characters in Michel Faber's 19th-C novel (The crimson...).
HIs tone is also very good: it's moral but it's not moralising and it's, in fact, very open-minded, certainly when it comes to trying and understand the link between poverty, social background and the underworld.
Essential.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews