I started this book right before my trip to Cuba, and finished it at Trinidad, Cuba (and I am writing this book review in the loft of my bnb at Trinidad).
Gott’s book has many features of great history works: well researched, presented in a scholarly tone, clearly (chronologically) structured, and makes clear distinction between what is fact and what is opinion. If I have to be picky, I think good historians provide unbiased and comprehensive account of history, whereas great historians compellingly make a central argument/thesis out of their findings. Gott, at least from my perspective, does not provide much personal insights or well synthesized arguments. Notably, he states upfront at the beginning of this book that Cuba’s history is one of violence and conflicts, but at the epilogue, he argues that under Fidel Castro, four peaceful decades has passed by and new changes (ones of “seductions of capitalism”) has been implemented, and he does not foresee any violence, be it internal rebellions or external interventions, after Castro’s death.
To summarize this book, Cuba’s history can be divided into four periods, as a Spanish colony, as an American backyard, as an independent republic, as a Soviet ally and post cold war. In each period, violence is present. In Spanish colonial era, there are rebellions pro independence (by the white whose monetary and political interests were curtailed by the Crown), pro anti-slavery (by the black), and pro US-annexation (facilitated by the political interest of the States under Monroe Doctrine). Yet, these fronts never unite with each other (Haitian revolution, checks and balance among European powers and the States). U.S., becoming one polar of the world, started to expand its geopolitical power and forced the decaying Spanish power out. US occupation did not last long, and its hegemony left the island with anti-American heritage. U.S. backed presidents (the last one being famous Batista) ruled for a few decades before Castro brothers and Che Guevara, through the guerrilla warfare, drove him out. In the second half of twentieth century, Cuba, under the threat of US invasion and constant harassment by Cuba-American exiles, sought allies (with Soviet Union, and gained considerable economic benefits from Soviet countries) and exported revolution to Latin America and Africa. It seems Castro has succumbed to the political reality by backing Soviet up in its intervention of Prague’s Springer and Velvet revolution. However, as a mature politician, Castro’s priority is to keep his party and country above water (whereas Guevara was more idealistic and I guess his actions attracted more pressure from the Western world). Personally I feel between these two different approaches towards revolution, no one is better than the other (like most of issues in the world).
I feel there is a mutual reinforcement/revelation between the last part of this book and my experience here at Cuba. Post cold war, when the economic lifeline of petroleum/food import and lucrative sugar export were gone with the demise of Soviet Union, Cuba turned to tourism and private economy (and hence partial conversion to capitalism, and it is interesting to see Army’s role in it). The two set of currencies in Cuba now, and how expensive private restaurants are, how limited stock unit in market are can all have their origins in the collapse of communism. I partially agree with Gott in that in short term, there will be no foreseeable violence that has been persisted throughout much of Cuban history, but I am a believer of dynamic equilibrium, and I think Castro’s narrative of country identity and moral position will be eroded (sadly) by the passage of time and more changes should be on their way.