I have a lot of thoughts on this book. On one hand it is a fairly radical book by today's standards, because christian mysticism isn't really practiced anymore so the fact she is constantly having sex with Jesus in her visions is going to shock people. But like, nuns traditionally were married to Christ, it is only after the witch hunts that it seems this takes the form of an abnegation of sexual pleasure, before that it was much more common to 'have sex with Christ' for Christian women. The BDSM elements are also fascinating, she's constantly being called a worm or belittled, or tied up and taken away by Jesus to the cellar, or the garden, or wherever. On the other hand, she is writing in the 1200's and there is a lot of internalized misogyny (this might be part of the bdsm thing?), and just general references to court life and court poetry that I assume one needs more knowledge than I have to fully understand what she's saying at points. I feel like I'm missing some of the cultural context her writing is taking place in. Christian mysticism stems from Dionysus worship, since all mystics believe that god can take the form of agape-eros, so this book also reads quite Nietzschian at times, especially the parts where she waxes about enjoying suffering and comfort.