Essentially, the book was a series of transcripts from this class at Harvard called Global Values 101. The idea behind the class was to provide a place where students could engage with experts, politicians, journalists, and business leaders. They’d have a different guest every class and, after reading things this guest wrote, they’d have a question-and-answer type conversation.
Parts were pretty boring. Parts felt a little radically left. Parts felt outdated. But, still, parts of it were really interesting and enlightening.
One way this book changed me was the desire I have to read histories of other countries. I realized that in my America-centric education I don’t know much at all about the recent history of other countries. I am a proponent of globalization in the sense that we should view the world holistically instead of dividing ourselves up in nations and tribes (obviously this is an ideal to strive towards and not a realistic short term goal). But I had to ask myself how could I truly view the rest of the world as my brothers and sisters if I don’t know anything about them and their culture. This quote by Noam Chomsky summed up this up for me, both on a micro and macro level. “We do not notice when we do things to other people. When they do something to us, we notice. But when we do it to them, it just didn't happen" (pg. 44).
One thing I liked and agreed with was this principle put forth by Naomi Klein. "We mistakenly believe that guilt is your best motivator. The way to get people active is to make them feel really bad and berate them with their complicity in an abusive system. That complicity is there and the abuses are there, but my experience is that guilt is a short-term motivator. Make people feel guilty and they might give money or sign a petition, but then they will just try to avoid the people making them feel guilty, because people really don't like to feel guilty" (pg. 111). This applies to me personally as I work to achieve my goals and become the person I want to be. It also applies in my interactions with others. Unconditional love and acceptance, validation, and support are far more powerful motivators than guilt.
At times the book was frustrating because I felt like the guest was too radical or had too narrow of a vision of the world. This offered me a chance to practice listening to other people’s perspectives even when I didn’t agree with them. And I mean really listen, not in a combative or critical way, but in a way that helped me to see the world through their eyes. For instance, I was able to open myself up to questioning whether capitalism is the golden economic system I’ve always believed it is. While my views haven’t changed that it was (and currently is) the right system for the modern world, I was able to better see flaws in it that I’ve been blind to before - a tendency towards promoting consumerism, allowing too much power for big corporations with tremendous marketing resources, and a hyper focus on things that don’t truly matter (i.e. money).
Swanee Hunt underscored this principle of listening to people you don’t agree with using a great quote from a conversation she had with Viktor Frankl (a man I highly respect). "Dr. Frankl said to me, 'Madame Ambassador. Sometimes the right thing to do is only 55 percent right.'... If you think about it, you do not know if you are on the side of the 55 or the 45 because if you have a position that is 45 percent right, you can make a fabulous case for that position. You can write essays, you can write books describing why the 45 percent is right. You do not know you are right until you look back, and even then you do not know. You are in a position where you have to commit or you are just paralyzed... If you are certain on your position...you are probably not being very thoughtful" (pg. 183). The part at the end about being thoughtful is my favorite. Again, I don’t need to agree with everyone, but I should be thoughtful and consider why they believe what they believe and look for how I might be blind towards truths they’re sharing.
Finally, I loved learning about Aaron Feuerstein and his controversial decision to continue to pay his his employees after his textile mill burned to the ground in the 1990s. That he didn’t decide to rebuild in a cheaper country and maximize profits is one thing, but to continue to pay his workers while he rebuilt was inspiring. I’m not sure he made the right decision (I’m not sure he didn’t either), but I loved where his focus was - on the people. He didn’t think about the money he was losing or how to maximize his own bank account, he cared about his workers and his responsibility to them. It made me wonder what the world would be like if businesses hired people and they became the shareholders. They could help make the decisions, determine the trajectory of the company, and share in the profits. I am looking forward to exploring thoughts about what that would be like.
Overall, I’m glad I read it. Not sure I’d recommend it cause it was a bit boring much of the time, but there were some gems.