Mary, Queen of Scots has been condemned to die. In this historical novel, we hear her side of the story as she describes the events leading up to her execution to her servants.
Reading this novel, I couldn't help but think that Mary's life was doomed from the start. Starting with her widowhood at age 18, it seems as though she had to fight for her very existence from an early age. She also did not seem to have the benefit of competent advisors; so though raised and trained to be a queen, she seems to have trusted the wrong people and made a number of poor decisions that led to her early demise.
Throughout the book, Mary's tone is defiant, but sometimes petulant and entitled. This is what interests me the most about this story. In this first person account, we feel like we're hearing Mary's voice.
Mary's viewpoint is deeply influenced by her Roman Catholic faith. This is largely what made her a threat to the protestant Scotland, and it's unlikely she would have had a future there without a conversion.
There are challenges to telling a story in first person -- one of them is the risk of "telling" vs. "showing," and there were times I would have liked more showing. For example, Mary mentions a poisoned pear incident, but I was unclear what that was about beyond one of many attempts on Mary's life. I also didn't get a sense for what a day in the life of a queen was like, and I would have liked to have seen more of that.
However, the further into the book, the more absorbing it becomes. I ached for every misstep and wished the story could have turned out differently. When it was over I felt deep sadness for this queen who was, for the most part, not allowed to rule.