I picked this up because I love trivia about animals, and a book attracts my attention when it is proclaimed gross.
It moderately added to my knowledge of semi-useful (or is it useless?) information about various animals. It also may come in handy when arguing about which animals are 'better' or when I'm watching Jeopardy, but as some other readers have pointed out, I'm still not positive why my dog eats poop.
(He gets plenty of attention and A+ grade food. He probably finds the cat poop tasty.)
The book could have done with a better sensitivity read and found inconsistencies with some issues presented. When animal testing comes up, there is a complete lack of sensitivity. Then, when a timely topic of climate change relates to animals, i.e., the raising of cows for meat production and how it increases the amount of methane released into the atmosphere (it's not because of farts, it's the burps!), it's suggested humans eat kangaroo meat instead. "We can hardly ask the cows to stop burping." Seriously?
It's suggested that we control global warming because rising temperatures could have potentially disastrous consequences for crocodilian populations. (The temperature of the incubating egg determines the sex of the crocodile.)
I understand that the writer(s) may not want to take a moral or ethical high ground, but a simple suggestion of a plant-based diet would have been more in keeping with the current climate change information.
I think there were some strange stances taken and perspectives on a few things.
I also found an issue with the tone of delivery; I couldn't tell whether the text was intended to come across as sarcastic or with humor. Sometimes examples and backup evidence are presented, and the info seems scientific and complete, but at other times, the reader is left wanting more (like an index).
It's still a generally quick and fun read and could have even been longer.