"This isn't yet another 'how to write' book," writes Kate Grenville in the introduction to *The Writing Book*. "In fact it isn't a 'how to write' book at all. This is a practical workbook, a resource book for a writer to work through, with an emphasis on exercises and examples." As such, I found *The Writing Book* to be wonderfully useful and refreshing.
In this book, Grenville walks through various key aspects of fiction writing. The ten chapters are self-descriptively titled "Getting started", "Sorting through", "Character", "Point of view", "Voice", "Dialogue", "Description", "Design", "Revision" and "Submitting a manuscript". Nevertheless, rather than instructing her reader on how to go about these different aspects of writing, Grenville tends to merely lay out the options, offering wise but un-preachy advice. Each chapter contains writing samples that offer ideas, illustrate the options. Many of these samples are very helpful and really quite brilliant works of art.
Though she acknowledges the many types of writing and many ways of going about the craft, I found that Grenville's style was much less plotty and more writing focussed than I'm used to. For some of the early exercises, she wrote some rather disconnected pieces of fiction from which she produced a story which she includes towards the end of the book. "Plot" she writes, "is one of the most artificial qualities in the artificial construct called fiction". She doesn't utterly disown the plot, but suggests that for some writers it may work better to begin with "characters, places, vivid language, and so on" and let the plot emerge in later drafts. This is very different from my style of writing: typically I envisage a plot first (if only a general one), and my writing flows from that. Thinking about it more, though, I wonder if for some of my stories this practice doesn't make sense. Formulating clever plots certainly isn't my strong point, and perhaps I would be better off focussing foremost on the aspects of my writing that I do better, and letting the plot flow out of that.
Another useful chapter, which I in fact read just now, is the one on revision. "Revision" she notes, "should be a complete re-vision". It's not the same as editing: at this stage you're trying to look at your finished draft with fresh eyes, trying to forget what you originally intended and see what you can best do with what you've got. Revision is hard; you've often got to be ruthless; but it can also be the funnest part. She recommends going back through the characters, voice, dialogue, description and design [plot] and seeing how well they work. Again, it wasn't really a 'how to' chapter on revision, but it was a useful guide, especially as I am now embarking on the revision of a story I have been writing for quite some time.
I won't go through what she says about all the different topics, but for any fiction writers out there, *The Writing Book* is definitely worth reading. It's not a 'how to' book, but I think that's for the best. Writing is an art, not a procedure. Art should not be wholly dictated, formulated. There may be a place for rules and formulae (especially among those of us who are still quite amateur) but those rules are only there to be broken, as we should not forget. Sometimes what we need most are ideas, perhaps a little unpretentious advice and a good dose of other peoples' art for inspiration. That's exactly what *The Writing Book* gives.