I've been fascinated by the short-lived career of the tank destroyer force since I first learned about them in the 1990s. What Yeide has done here is to pay homage to many of the TD battalions that saw action in the thick of the fighting in North Africa, Italy, and the ETO (there were many who didn't do much more than serve as mobile indirect fire artillery; Yeide mentions them in passing). Their story is a compelling one: conceived at a time when the US Army had more horses than motorized vehicles, their founder General Andrew Bruce worked out a whole doctrine on their usage that was promptly ignored as soon as they got into combat. Too often, these nimble, well-armed, thin-skinned vehicles were treated as tanks by the armor and infantry officers who ended up commanding them. It took many battles--and lots of losses--before the Army figured out the best way to mix tanks, TDs, and infantry into effective combined arms teams. They got that doctrine nailed down just in time for V-E Day... at which point it was decided to just build better tanks with better guns, and do away wih the tank destroyer arm altogether.
Yeide's recounting of the various TD actions in three theaters is very well done, and he makes it possible to follow the thread of an individual battalion or even individual TD soldiers through the whole war, which adds a very personal element to this war story. He doesn't waste time on too many of the larger strategic details because there are plenty of other books for that; he saves his words for the well-researched stories that set this book apart.
Yeide used some of the "standard" reference works about TDs and armored combat as the backbone of his narrative--Calvin Boykin's Gare Le Bete, Belton Cooper's Death Traps, and of course many of the Army's Green Books. I was a little disappointed not to see Mike Baily's Faint Praise: American Tanks and Tank Destroyers during World War II, which I consider to be the granddaddy of all books about TDs and their development and doctrine. (Disclaimer: I worked with Mike on the Anti-Armor Defense Data study for the DOAE in the late '80s, and that's why my own Against the Panzers--also not in Yeide's bibliography--has a strong TD flavor to it.)
My only other niggle is that the handful of maps in this book are just sufficient to give some strategic context to the battles Yeide discusses, but they are crude and not detailed enough. Still, if you love reading about armor in World War II you will really want to check out this excellent book.