What do you think?
Rate this book
Faith, Form, and Time: What the Bible Teaches and Science Confirms about Creation and the Age of the Universe
Darwinian theories of the universe, although mostly rejected by evangelical Christians, have still found their way into creation theology. A concept such as evolutionist creation has watered down much of the Bible's teaching in order to reconcile with popular tenants of science. The whole controversy swirls around the age of the universe.Dr. Kurt Wise, an associate professor of science and director of the Center for Origins Research and Education at Bryan College, shows from solid biblical teachings and scientific confirmation why young universe creation is correct. Beginning with God and His Word as the standard, Wise demonstrates how the biblical witness teaches that the age of the universe is not as old as Darwinian theory would contend. He also demonstrates how all issues raised by evolutionists can be answered not only by the Bible, but also by scientific data and research, nailing shut macroevolution's coffin.
288 pages, Paperback
First published September 1, 2002
24 people are currently reading
126 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
September 29, 2016
I had never heard of Kurt Wise before a friend recommended this book. It was an excellent read. Several things of note from the book.
First, he is a YEC, global flood guy who believes in everything the Bible says. The book operates on this assumption. In other words, he operates from the view the God of the Bible exists. He is not an ID guy or something like that. He assumes a literal fall with sin and death entering the world at that point.
Second, he does not treat evolutionists or OEC as if they are idiots. In other words, he is gracious throughout the book and a good model of how to interact with those we disagree with. He states in various places that evolutionists have good reasons for believing certain things.
Third, he does not assume YEC answers all the questions out there. At numerous places in the book he indicates the need for more research from the YEC guys to answer specific questions put to them by OEC folks. This approach spurs on the need for more research by Christian scientists. If I was a young Christian looking to study biology, geology, or similar disciplines I would find a good ally in Wise.
Fourth, he does indicate that YEC answers more questions better. In other words, YEC is not just more plausible via Scripture, but even via science it is more plausible. He often uses phrases like "it would seem" or "at this point in study" or "if YEC is true then this scientific finding makes sense" and so on. He does not say everything evolution says is rubbish and stupid. But he does indicate that YEC does a better job answering more questions, though it does not answer all of them.
Fifth, he does a lot work with the post-Flood world and Babel. I am not convinced of all that he says in these sections. But again the goal is not absolute assurance, but plausibility. Can a worldwide flood account for the earth as it is today? He gives numerous examples of how the flood can do this. This was one of more fascinating sections of the book as he described shifting plates, an Ice Advance, as he called it, the creation of canyons via large amounts of rain, etc. Many YEC folks focus on the global flood, but Wise spends more time on how a post-flood world would create the c geological formations, etc. that we have. Also his section on Babel was unique, at least as far as my reading goes, but only served to increase the plausibility of the Biblical account when laid alongside the world as it currently is.
Sixth, some of this was way over my head. Two sections, that on DNA and the part on tectonic plates, were hard for me to follow. There is quite a bit of technical language in the book.
Finally, what Wise does best is convince you that YEC/global flood/Babel are just as plausible, if not more plausible , than evolution or OEC. But he does this without treating either group as fools and without giving the impression that we just point at Genesis 1 and tell people to shut up. He also does it in such as way as to encourage Christian scientists to explore the world.
He does have some strange dispensational/pre-mil views that show through here and there, but overall do not impact the value of the book.
Highly recommended to all Christians who are interested in the topic.
My Rating System
1 Star-Terrible book and dangerous. Burn it in the streets.
2 Stars-Really bad book, would not recommend, probably has some dangerous ideas in it or could just be so poorly written/researched that it is not worth reading. Few books I read are 1 or 2 stars because I am careful about what I read.
3 Stars-Either I disagree with it at too many points to recommend it or it is just not a good book on the subject or for the genre. Would not read it again, reference it, or recommend it. But it is not necessarily dangerous except as a time waster.
4 Stars-Solid book on the subject or for the genre. This does not mean I agree with everything in it. I would recommend this book to others and would probably read it again or reference it. Most books fall in this category because I try not to read books I don’t think will be good. There is a quite a variety here. 3.6 is pretty far from 4.5.
5 Stars-Excellent book. Classic in the genre or top of the line for the subject. I might also put a book in here that impacted me personally at the time I read it. I would highly recommend this book, even if I do not agree with all that it says. Few books fall in this category. Over time I have put less in this category.
First, he is a YEC, global flood guy who believes in everything the Bible says. The book operates on this assumption. In other words, he operates from the view the God of the Bible exists. He is not an ID guy or something like that. He assumes a literal fall with sin and death entering the world at that point.
Second, he does not treat evolutionists or OEC as if they are idiots. In other words, he is gracious throughout the book and a good model of how to interact with those we disagree with. He states in various places that evolutionists have good reasons for believing certain things.
Third, he does not assume YEC answers all the questions out there. At numerous places in the book he indicates the need for more research from the YEC guys to answer specific questions put to them by OEC folks. This approach spurs on the need for more research by Christian scientists. If I was a young Christian looking to study biology, geology, or similar disciplines I would find a good ally in Wise.
Fourth, he does indicate that YEC answers more questions better. In other words, YEC is not just more plausible via Scripture, but even via science it is more plausible. He often uses phrases like "it would seem" or "at this point in study" or "if YEC is true then this scientific finding makes sense" and so on. He does not say everything evolution says is rubbish and stupid. But he does indicate that YEC does a better job answering more questions, though it does not answer all of them.
Fifth, he does a lot work with the post-Flood world and Babel. I am not convinced of all that he says in these sections. But again the goal is not absolute assurance, but plausibility. Can a worldwide flood account for the earth as it is today? He gives numerous examples of how the flood can do this. This was one of more fascinating sections of the book as he described shifting plates, an Ice Advance, as he called it, the creation of canyons via large amounts of rain, etc. Many YEC folks focus on the global flood, but Wise spends more time on how a post-flood world would create the c geological formations, etc. that we have. Also his section on Babel was unique, at least as far as my reading goes, but only served to increase the plausibility of the Biblical account when laid alongside the world as it currently is.
Sixth, some of this was way over my head. Two sections, that on DNA and the part on tectonic plates, were hard for me to follow. There is quite a bit of technical language in the book.
Finally, what Wise does best is convince you that YEC/global flood/Babel are just as plausible, if not more plausible , than evolution or OEC. But he does this without treating either group as fools and without giving the impression that we just point at Genesis 1 and tell people to shut up. He also does it in such as way as to encourage Christian scientists to explore the world.
He does have some strange dispensational/pre-mil views that show through here and there, but overall do not impact the value of the book.
Highly recommended to all Christians who are interested in the topic.
My Rating System
1 Star-Terrible book and dangerous. Burn it in the streets.
2 Stars-Really bad book, would not recommend, probably has some dangerous ideas in it or could just be so poorly written/researched that it is not worth reading. Few books I read are 1 or 2 stars because I am careful about what I read.
3 Stars-Either I disagree with it at too many points to recommend it or it is just not a good book on the subject or for the genre. Would not read it again, reference it, or recommend it. But it is not necessarily dangerous except as a time waster.
4 Stars-Solid book on the subject or for the genre. This does not mean I agree with everything in it. I would recommend this book to others and would probably read it again or reference it. Most books fall in this category because I try not to read books I don’t think will be good. There is a quite a variety here. 3.6 is pretty far from 4.5.
5 Stars-Excellent book. Classic in the genre or top of the line for the subject. I might also put a book in here that impacted me personally at the time I read it. I would highly recommend this book, even if I do not agree with all that it says. Few books fall in this category. Over time I have put less in this category.
August 29, 2020
Without a doubt, the most in-depth analysis of possible explanations through a biblical lens of our natural world today. Had to read this for a class, and it is one of the few textbooks I truly enjoyed. It was very eye opening to understand more of our natural history and why the evolutionary understanding lacks in logical explanation.
Although much is speculation and hypothetical, so is lots of evolutionary theory, and IMO these explanations are superior in nature. A great defense of biblical inerrancy that equips you to defend the faith and be more aware of opposing viewpoints.
Although much is speculation and hypothetical, so is lots of evolutionary theory, and IMO these explanations are superior in nature. A great defense of biblical inerrancy that equips you to defend the faith and be more aware of opposing viewpoints.
Read
December 15, 2011I've actually only read the first 149 pages of this. Hopefully I can finish it at another time, I just have other books on my priority list to read.
July 21, 2012
Avoid unless you're a hardcore, young Earth creationist:)
April 3, 2018
Unimpressive, unhelpful and relatively weak conjecture.
November 28, 2017
Meh. I read it for a class, if you didn't guess. Some parts were fairly easy to understand, others were confusing and often circular in argument.
July 22, 2018
Very interesting but also a bit out of my element - I only took Biology in school!
August 8, 2023
I have read so many books on the evidence that supports the Biblical narrative of creation. So I do not expect to learn a lot of new things but a review is always good. I did find some information that either I had not read before, or had forgotten. If you, as a Christian, wonder if evolution is good science, I recommend reading some of the books by scientists who are convinced that the entire Bible is God's word and true. There is no scientific reason to reject the Biblical description of creation. The evidence is not the issue. The issue is how the evidence is interpreted and that comes from worldview. Those who reject God are going to reject creation and seek to interpret the evidence differently!
June 12, 2016
Excellent summary written for the believer. Dr. Wise has done a great job of bringing a very large subject into the covers of a single book. Highly recommend it for those who are already believers in Young Earth Creation. Although Dr. Wise did not write this as an argument for, or defense of, his view, I can see it being valuable for those interested in a reasonable presentation of the view. Going to put it on the "Brock's encouraged to read this" shelf at home.
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews