Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Contested Conversions to Islam: Narratives of Religious Change in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire

Rate this book
This book explores how Ottoman Muslims and Christians understood the phenomenon of conversion to Islam from the 15th to the 17th centuries. The Ottomans ruled over a large non-Muslim population and conversion to Islam was a contentious subject for all communities, especially Muslims themselves. Ottoman Muslim and Christian authors sought to define the boundaries and membership of their communities while promoting their own religious and political agendas. Tijana Krstić argues that the production and circulation of narratives about conversion to Islam was central to the articulation of Ottoman imperial identity and Sunni Muslim "orthodoxy" in the long 16th century. Placing the evolution of Ottoman attitudes toward conversion and converts in the broader context of Mediterranean-wide religious trends and the Ottoman rivalry with the Habsburgs and Safavids, Contested Conversions to Islam draws on a variety of sources, including first-person conversion narratives and Orthodox Christian neomartyologies, to reveal the interplay of individual, (inter)communal, local, and imperial initiatives that influenced the process of conversion.

280 pages, Hardcover

First published May 13, 2011

2 people are currently reading
58 people want to read

About the author

Tijana Krstić is Associate Professor in the Medieval Studies Department at Central European University in Budapest.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
6 (20%)
4 stars
11 (36%)
3 stars
10 (33%)
2 stars
3 (10%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Author 6 books253 followers
February 17, 2013
A mildly incoherent look at conversion in the Ottoman Empire in the 15th-17th centuries based primarily on the study of narratives and texts produced by converts. As with any textual-based study which is justified through smugly self-righteous abstraction, Krstic relies for most of her evidence on the texts themselves. Now, while these might some interesting insights into certain aspects of the time (Christian converts' discussion of the Reformation, for example) they are not particularly illuminating as regards to what conversion meant more widely. Assuming that there was such a thing as "Ottoman Islam", Krstic sets out to define what it actually was via these narratives and debates over conversion. Throw in some wars with the Hapsburgs and Safavids and apparently you have a convenient answer. But, no, wait! Tie it all up with a wishy-washy conclusion "calling for further research" and you've sealed your own fate.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.